Graphic Cards HD 4830 crossfire wipes out GTX 280

Status
Not open for further replies.

muzux2

Forerunner
Oftentimes we've lambasted multi-GPU graphics-card setups as a general waste of money,pointing our readers in the direction of the fastest single-GPU card that their budget allows them to buy.However, of late, both ATI and NVIDIA have cleaned up their multi-GPU acts,and scaling in popular games is such that adding a second GPU - be it on the PCB itself or via another card - makes implicit sense if the value proposition
is just right.
The sub-£100 Sapphire Radeon HD 4830 512MB validates this point by providing reasonable high-end gaming performance on its own but practically doubling average framerate when another is added.Despite initial misgivings, we're impressed with how well Sapphire's non-reference
cooler works, and would recommend the company adding a software-based tool that lets the user modulate the speed of the fan(s) to suit their aural taste. Additional performance derived by a second card gives cumulative numbers, over our four games, which are equal to a pre-overclocked GeForce GTX 280, but the win here is with a substantially lower street price - £200 vs. £330 - and multi-monitor outputs.

Yes, you need to have a CrossFire-supporting motherboard and some games may not show the kind of scaling we've seen in our testing, but a combined £200 buys you smooth performance at 2,560x1,600 HQ settings.:ohyeah: Kind of begs the question as to whether Sapphire will launch a Radeon HD 4830 X2, priced at around £180, doesn't it?:ohyeah:

We'll be taking a look at a couple of GeForce 9800 GTs and seeing how the price/performance proposition plays out in comparison, but, perhaps, multi-GPU setups finally make good sense when the underlying technology is priced so aggressively.

HEXUS.net - Review :: Sapphire Radeon HD 4830 512MB - CrossFire making sense? : Page - 1/10
PS : thats awsome scaling, i guess two of 4830's would cost here 16K, that will even give 4870 a run for its money..:P
 
even with the extra cash spend on crossfire ready mobo a good psu it still works out to be cheaper than a gtx 280 setup
 
core 216 costs same now , it is better buy coz single card will always perform 100% and CF scaling not always good .
 
this was going to happen...........
specially after 4850CF crushing GTX280 .

YES , single card is always an good option........BUT CF is scaling good on most of the games .........so i think someone colud not go wrong with it .
 
beating in 2 games which scale well with CF doesnt mean it " wipes out " gtx 280 , those games scale well with CF are tested .
 
^ Maybe it doesn't "wipe out"... but to put in nVidia's own language, at that pricepoint it definitely "WHOOPS ASS" on GTX280! :bleh:
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
iGo said:
Hmm.... this question goes around you know? simple replace ATi with nVidia there... :bleh:
if u are talking about me , then i have tried many ati cards , i was about to get 4850 , but cooling performance was crap , now when i got this CF board i decided to get 4850 CF or 4850x2 , but then nvidia dropped 260 and core 216's price , and at 12k its much better buy than 4850 :tongue: , now getting core 216 probably :bleh:
 
RoBoGhOsT said:
if u are talking about me , then i have tried many ati cards , i was about to get 4850 , but cooling performance was crap , now when i got this CF board i decided to get 4850 CF or 4850x2 , but then nvidia dropped 260 and core 216's price , and at 12k its much better buy than 4850 :tongue: , now getting core 216 probably :bleh:

A sensible post after all the mindless DAAMIT deification that's been happening at TE :P.
 
RoBoGhOsT said:
if u are talking about me , then i have tried many ati cards , i was about to get 4850 , but cooling performance was crap , now when i got this CF board i decided to get 4850 CF or 4850x2 , but then nvidia dropped 260 and core 216's price , and at 12k its much better buy than 4850 :tongue: , now getting core 216 probably :bleh:

Most of the non-reference 4850 cards from Palit, Sapphire and others have very good cooling systems. In fact, IMO, a Palit 4850 Sonic edition for ~11.4k would be much more VFM than the GTX260. It beats out the GTX260 in most benchmarks except in some nVidia-optimized games like Crysis.

I was also an nVidia fan for quite some time even after the 4xxx series released. But then ATi won me over with the sheer performance. At one point, I was even considering getting a 4870 while its prices were near 15k-16k. So I am in the red team camp for now and I am getting myself a Palit 4850 Sonic soon.

EDIT: Yay its my 150th post! And still my rep is only "Notable" :(
 
junkiedogg said:
Most of the non-reference 4850 cards from Palit, Sapphire and others have very good cooling systems. In fact, IMO, a Palit 4850 Sonic edition for ~11.4k would be much more VFM than the GTX260. It beats out the GTX260 in most benchmarks except in some nVidia-optimized games like Crysis.

I was also an nVidia fan for quite some time even after the 4xxx series released. But then ATi won me over with the sheer performance. At one point, I was even considering getting a 4870 while its prices were near 15k-16k. So I am in the red team camp for now and I am getting myself a Palit 4850 Sonic soon.

EDIT: Yay its my 150th post! And still my rep is only "Notable" :(

please post a review where it beats a stock gtx260.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.