esanthosh
Skilled
RE-262 vs DBA-02
Introduction
OK! I am up all night as I could not get sleep. What better way to spend than writing another comparison hyeah:
The comparison is certainly like comparing an apple to orange (why is it always an orange, why not some other fruit?). One is an analytical IEM and the other is a musical IEM.
Setup:
Clip+ #1 (Vol: 0 dB) -> iBasso T3 (No Gain, Vol: 5) -> RE-262
Clip+ #2 (Vol: -20 dB) -> DBA-02
Build Quality
DBA-02 has a white and black twisted cable. It has a Blue and White plastic shell with a small strain relief. In comparison, RE-262 has a longer and better strain relief at the housing. To compensate, DBA-02 has a longer Y-Split with strain reliefs before and after the Y. DBA-02 has a cord cinch which is more useful than the tighter, refusing to move chin slider of the Hifiman. While it's still as plasticky as the SM3 housing, I feel a tad better handling the DBA as I am more used to it by now. I also like the angled nozzle as such IEMs usually give me better insertion, fit and seal.
Sound Quality
DBA-02 have what I'll call "Made for me" sound. So, what started out as a small 'getting warmed up' session for this comparison has elongated into a 4 hr listening session with DBA-02 punctuated by the comparisons you are about to read.
The Bass of DBA-02 is quicker, tighter and has more impact than RE-262. RE-262 has better texture and presents bass in a much softer way. DBA-02 is slightly more extended than 262.
The Mids of DBA-02 are in fine balance with the bass and the treble. They have a slight tinge of warmness. They are very sharp and lean sounding compared to the softer, smoother, lusher RE-262. If the recording had sibilance, DBA-02 will not make any attempt to hide it. Like any good analytical IEM, DBA-02 will bring out tiniest of details to the front. For a BA, it has good timbre too!
The treble of DBA-02 is lean, fast, detailed and aggressive. I'm yet to hear an IEM which is this lean and mean. Do I even need to compare?
Coming to the sound stage, do I need to tell you that RE-262 beats DBA-02 in all dimensions and has out of the ear imaging? With imaging, DBA-02 is good, but certainly not great. But for that, DBA-02 compensates with it's speed. In general, analytical IEMs tend to be dry and thin, whereas I'd call DBA-02 as fast, lean and engaging.
Conclusion
In this uneven comparison of an analytic IEM and a musical one, it's tough to pronounce a simple statement like A is better than B. I personally would prefer DBA-02 ahead of RE-262 by quite a margin, because as an overall package DBA-02 to me sounds very relaxing. For somebody else, it could be the RE-262.
For now, it's time to get at least a couple of hours sleep :no: