booo said:all cons and no pros in my view...
usually honda and HH's spares are very costly. Check the service given in your area. it depends a lot on that.
people select hondas just because of the engine refinement, but the engines of other vehicles are not bad either. in my opinion, apache and pulsars have more vfm.
my list would be:
1. apache RTR
2. pulsar 150
yes :clap: you in pune thesedays!!!Darthcoder said:b00 you idiot, you are raghunandan, arent you?
There is practically no difference with the monoshock compared the normal suspension setup of other bikes....gcbeldar said:First of all, Thanks a lot to all.
No one mentioned about single shock absorver & for which i was very much attracted.
Waiting for some comments about single shock absorver. boz i use in rough roads, shifting from Bullet.
Anish said:I'd suggest a Pulsar 200 or RTR 160, the Unicorn seems to have gotten a little outdated and performance isn't all that great anymore, besides spares and service will cost you a bomb as others have stated.
$nick$ said:see gcbeldar if you want more mileage less on looks then definetly you should go for unicorn but if you are looking for good looks and decent mileage then i would suggest you to go for pulsar 150.
about 4-5 months ago i was in same situation as you are and after checking all the pros and cons only, i went for pulsar 150.And iam happy that i made that decision![]()
greenhorn said:my only problem with the pulsar was that my b@lls hurt after riding one all day![]()