techpal said:Same 3.5 inch screen, m happy my sgs2 is even better than iphone4S.
RS4 said:even 5 months old SGS2 is enough to compete with this iphone 4S.
RS4 said:Apple has restricted Siri voice commands to iphone 4S , so that iphone 4 looks obsolete now
Gannu said:Siri has completely blown me away TBH.
RS4 said:So this is apple's innovation in 16 months time :S
aradhakr84 said:Real disappointment. But considering their history this does not surprise me at all.
I believe Apple's strategy is to sell as many 4 and 4S to the masses and then make them upgrade to the next one (IP5) It is not bad for Apple from marketing standpoint. Because with this they are stretching the innovation train so that it keeps the customers like us locked in. If you look at the Android phone, they have evolved too fast. What do you think is next for Android? Bigger screens? We have already seen the likes of Nexus Prime and Galaxy Note. Faster Processors? We already have that in IPhone 4S and pretty much all of the Android phones that are releasing.
Of course there will be upgrades in hardware/software specs, but they will be incremental not revolutionary. If Android would have come out with something revolutionary, then Apple would be worried to release something other than Iphone 4S. Hopefully next year will be different with Iphone 5 having a new and better design than its predecessor Iphone 4S.
avi said:16 month old iPhone 4 is enough to beat SGS 2 in battery. And now iPhone Ass has got A5, 8mp camera, dual core graphics(7x faster), 1080p recording
SGS2 has 1.2GHz dual core CPU,8MP camera,1080p recording. iphone 4 Ass lacks full multitasking, bluetooth file transfer, microsd storage, FM radio, video calls only via wifi, installing apps,music,videos only via itunes, OOB MKV playback, 2MP front camera, 21Mbps HSDPAavi said:16 month old iPhone 4 is enough to beat SGS 2 in battery. And now iPhone Ass has got A5, 8mp camera, dual core graphics(7x faster), 1080p recording.
RS4 said:iphone 4s lacks full multitasking, bluetooth file transfer, microsd storage, FM radio, video calls only via wifi, installing apps,music,videos only via itunes, OOB MKV playback, 2MP front camera, 21Mbps HSDPA
Metalspree said:I used siri in my iphone 4. Thanks to apple cant use it any more .
RS4 said:SGS2 has 1.2GHz dual core CPU,8MP camera,1080p recording. iphone 4 Ass lacks full multitasking, bluetooth file transfer, microsd storage, FM radio, video calls only via wifi, installing apps,music,videos only via itunes, OOB MKV playback, 2MP front camera, 21Mbps HSDPA
RS4 said:Yes, the iphone 4 is too weak to run voice commands hyeah:
Here begins the cycle we are so familiar with, Apple comes out with new tech, the world says its stupid, and then a year down the track we wonder how we ever lived without it.
"Siri, how come Fandroids first attack the rumors of Siri saying "Android does that, Apple SUXXXXX" and then when truth smacks them on the face they claim it's a ridiculous feature?"
Siri: "Hypocrisy: the practice of claiming to have moral standards or beliefs to which one's own behavior does not conform; pretense."
That's actually quite good.
If Siri was in Android, some mfr would force it into a phone that had too slow of a CPU, and the users would say it sucks. Google would say "but it needs at least a dual-core processor", but the mfrs won't listen. So Google then refuses to open-source the next version.
avi said:btw picked these comments from TMN
Strange, you are proudly referring things apple don't provide and even after jailbreak only half things are possible!!!avi said:YES but half of the things u said can be done with JB
As always happens when Apple rolls out a major technology (in this case, e-concierge services), critics are happy to point out that Cupertino is late to the party (can you believe that it took them 5+ years to respond to the Treo?!). Specifically, they’re calling Siri a catch-up effort to match Google Voice Actions technology that’s been available on Android for well over a year. Having used Voice Actions for awhile now, I can confirm that this is half-true. On a feature-by-feature basis, Siri looks me-too. But from an experience standpoint, it’s totally different. As usual, Google’s implementation is process-oriented. Apple’s, unsurprisingly, is human and friendly. And this is why Siri has the potential to be revolutionary.
Or take something significantly more straight-ahead and functional: weather. On Google Voice Actions, you talk like you’re dictating a Google search: “weather San Francisco Oct. 7â€. And then it displays the google search results that appear on a web page. That’s about it. On Siri, you say, “What’s the weather going to be like when I’m in San Francisco? How about Napa.†And the app responds in fairly natural form while also displaying the information it’s talking about in visual form.