sandclouds
Beginner
the price is around 72K , but msrp is $599(50k rupees ).
how long i have to wait for the price to go down to msrp?
how long i have to wait for the price to go down to msrp?
USD MSRP will never happen here, for multiple (and obvious) reasons.the price is around 72K , but msrp is $599(50k rupees ).
how long i have to wait for the price to go down to msrp?
And you think nvidia prices are right for the gaming performance, features and use cases you listed ?I honestly think the price of 9070 should be at 30-35k rs and 9070xt at 40-45k rs.
I agree with you on this but nvidia pricing is more shitier than AMD.I honestly think the price of 9070 should be at 30-35k rs and 9070xt at 40-45k rs
The highlighted part is the only (somewhat) sensible sentence in this entire statement, and I mean that very loosely.Not worth it... 5070 similar price, similar performance
Amd always gets lower sale because their terrible pricing at launch. They think they can compete with nvidia. But if two similar graphics card at similar price by nvidia n amd. I will always buy nvidia, just because i can do more than gaming if i want, like running local ai, edit videos, running video upscalling software etc. so suppose even if nvidia is little behind raster performance i will still buy nvidia. Because AMD gpu is a piece of bricks other than gaming, also they are quite poor in terms of PCB design, mosfet and memory cooling... Brands themselves cut costs because they know the sales would be low..
I honestly think the price of 9070 should be at 30-35k rs and 9070xt at 40-45k rs. If they really want to make sales in india (or anywhere else to a normal person, not youtuber/reviewer)
Nvidia price are justifiable..they are being generous to sell a 5070 at 60k including GST. DLSs works really good, runs cooler, eats less power.And you think nvidia prices are right for the gaming performance, features and use cases you listed ?
9070 XT has 5070 Ti level performance for nearly 15-20k less. OP asked for an AMD gpu price so its good to assume he doesn't want to do productivity tasks.
I agree with you on this but nvidia pricing is more shitier than AMD.
PS: I have a 5070 Ti but i still sometimes regret of buying it over a 9070 XT.
Let the market speak for itselfThe highlighted part is the only (somewhat) sensible sentence in this entire statement, and I mean that very loosely.
The rest of it just sounds like a fanboy rage-rant, with no organized dissection of pros and cons.
This is sarcasm… right?.. right?Nvidia price are justifiable..they are being generous to sell a 5070 at 60k including GST.
Nvidia price are justifiable..they are being generous to sell a 5070 at 60k including GST.
Dude, I run both a Nvidia and an Amd gpu. I run cad, adobe and other 3d software on my Amd card. It all works just fine.I will always buy nvidia, just because i can do more than gaming if i want, like running local ai, edit videos, running video upscalling software etc. so suppose even if nvidia is little behind raster performance i will still buy nvidia. Because AMD gpu is a piece of bricks other than gaming, also they are quite poor in terms of PCB design, mosfet and memory cooling... Brands themselves cut costs because they know the sales would be low..
Slightly OT. Anyone knows if this is better than the sapphire pulse? I've been waiting for the pulse to drop to 70.PowerColor Hellhound Radeon RX 9070 XT is available @computech for around 70k currently.
Yeah sapphire pulse is the basic, entry level card. This is considered a better model than pulse.Slightly OT. Anyone knows if this is better than the sapphire pulse? I've been waiting for the pulse to drop to 70.
FSR 3.1 is very close to DLSS now and they keep updating and improving it, If I play on an nvidia card obviously I would still be running DLSS but for AMD cards FSR is a godsend and remember it still runs on all GPUs so if DLSS in a particular game is causing you issues (ghosting/trails, artifacts etc.) then FSR saves the day.DLSs works really good, runs cooler, eats less power.
If I read correctly the vbios flash allows for unlocking OC limits set by AMD to that of RX 9070XT which leads to higher overclocking potential, it doesn't unlock "cores" as those are still faulty (what made the card into a 9070 as opposed to its XT variant).![]()
AMD RX 9070 vBIOS flash offers up-to 20% performance boost — modders claim OC beats 9070 XT
Close enough, welcome back, Vega 56.www.tomshardware.com
Before anyone jumps in with "but doesn't the 9070 XT have more physical shaders?"
My guess is that the 9070 XT's architecture isn't making proper use of all its shaders.
Also, the BIOS flash seems to allow the 9070 to OC higher than the XT's base clock by around 200 MHz, which is making up for the hardware gap.
Case in point - the 3080 can be OC'd to match a stock 3080 Ti (I can personally attest)
I remember the Fury closed the gap with the Fury X similarly.
It's nice to see some old-school vBIOS performance modding again after a long time
My mind was blown after seeing this videos. What a downgrade after 10xx series onwards.View attachment 229650
Inflation adjusted core config across Nvidia series by Gamers Nexus. "Generous" pricing for a xx50 card at the price of a xx70 card.
I am aware of the vbios flash. But never achieved stability at lower voltages at desired frequency on an AMD gpu. Probably they use lower quality silicons. Which is highly likely, since they cant sell them wellFSR 3.1 is very close to DLSS now and they keep updating and improving it, If I play on an nvidia card obviously I would still be running DLSS but for AMD cards FSR is a godsend and remember it still runs on all GPUs so if DLSS in a particular game is causing you issues (ghosting/trails, artifacts etc.) then FSR saves the day.
As for the pricing AMD's might seem higher because its NVIDIA who won't keep pricing at an expected level. They really don't care because they aren't profiting much from consumers, their main profits come from data center sector.
If I read correctly the vbios flash allows for unlocking OC limits set by AMD to that of RX 9070XT which leads to higher overclocking potential, it doesn't unlock "cores" as those are still faulty (what made the card into a 9070 as opposed to its XT variant).