Current Affairs Israel attacks Iran.

[TEUser2K1]

Go read your Reuters article for that answer

Irrespective of whether source is reuters, cnn or foxnews, if such facility and infra is demolished, radiation leak have to happen.
Reuters article says: "WHY ARE GULF STATES ESPECIALLY WORRIED?" since their water desalination plants are near by.
One have to have believable reports.

 

[blr_p]

Good that you're a Trump Supporter. How do you address this:

Trump once called Jan. 6 a 'heinous attack.' Now he calls it a 'day of love.'

The former president has increasingly defended his supporters who stormed the Capitol on Jan. 6, most recently referring to them as "we."

www.nbcnews.com

See the date of your article. He's not going to attack his supporters just before the election. Is he.

Why does it matter? He won. All the democrat charges now vanish.

A comic - I agree

And now a president with more balls than the last two put together. And he's not even six months into his presidency.

As an "excellent communicator"

He speaks to a demographic that is lower income. They get him and when you follow his rallies you understand why.

 

[DigitalDude]

Some of you are relying too much on the mainstream media who have the lowest trust and credibility... even far lower then the politicians and bureaucrats.

It is very sad.

 

[PunkX 75]

You have done what is typical of those who oppose. Listen to third commentary instead of listening to the man himself.

You do realize that opinions are formed out of "listening to the man himself." It's good that you admire him. Most don't. Does almost all of the populace account for "third-rate" or is your opinion gospel?

When you have an entire Wikipedia page dedicated to his BS, it's something. Unbecoming of a "good communicator", or maybe I missed the memo?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/False_or_misleading_statements_by_Donald_Trump

 

[blr_p]

Irrespective of whether source is reuters, cnn or foxnews, if such facility and infra is demolished, radiation leak have to happen.

Go and read the article. Then go and read the one I posted.

Reuters article says: "WHY ARE GULF STATES ESPECIALLY WORRIED?" since their water desalination plants are near by.
One have to have believable reports.

It's an unsubstantiated fear with no basis that only the uninformed and dim people believe.

 

[PunkX 75]

He speaks to a demographic that is lower income.

Sure.

Trump’s Boasts About His Wealth Just Helped Him Lose $83 Million

Donald Trump’s own words about the size of his fortune were used against him in the E. Jean Carroll trial.

www.vice.com

 

[blr_p]

You do realize that opinions are formed out of "listening to the man himself."

Had you listened to his speech you would not have misunderstood what he said. It was obvious the way you framed it in your opener.

They manipulate what he says. That's why he bashes them constantly and they absolutely deserve it. When it comes to Trump or Modi for that matter, always check what they say.

And then see the mental gymnastics to twist it. Or don't bother. I just follow his twitter feed.

It's good that you admire him. Most don't.

what good are those people when he's in charge. They are just noise makers.

The part I like is his foreign picy as that has a direct effect on us. Domestic isn't my business.

Do almost all of the populace account for "third-rate" or is your opinion gospel?

https://twitter.com/x/status/1936192849495937342

All of the populace? Nah

Is not about my opinion. He's in charge. He makes things happen.

I always support the government in charge for that reason. Didn't you know that. I don't waste time with what the opposition thinks or says.

What does the government want and what is its intent. That is what history will talk about.

When you have an entire Wikipedia page dedicated to his BS, it's something.

I'm interested in his achievements. Those are the money shots.

Start bashing, I'm walking. No time for that.

 

[PunkX 75]

Is not about my opinion.

With all due respect and a bit OT (I apologize)

While you do quote sources and have very good insights, you have a propensity to drag the narrative to what you feel is right (when it comes to politics). There is always a caveat and another side to the coin.


And before you reply with something along the lines of "I debunk everything with facts."

No offense meant, just something to consider.

Your points, while very valid, also have valid opposing arguments.

Start bashing, I'm walking. No time for that.

This is another point of contention that's been the growing feeling with your discussions - "It's my way or the highway."

 

[blr_p]

With all due respect and a bit OT (I apologize)

While you do quote sources and have very good insights, you have a propensity to drag the narrative to what you feel is right (when it comes to politics). There is always a caveat and another side to the coin.

That is true for everything but who decides in this case?

What does history record.

And since we are in a democracy and have accountable governments this is what was acceptable.

I'm not getting into right. That's a different point.

And before you reply with something along the lines of "I debunk everything with facts."

No offense meant, just something to consider.

Your points, while very valid, also have valid opposing arguments.

Nothing to debunk other than follow the boss. Because right is what he says it is. Disagree will get you fired.

The example I follow here is the military. They don't question. They know the system and follow orders.

When you are discuss policy with bureaucrat, diplomacy or military you have to know what the governments policy on the subject concerned.

Liking the government is optional.

 

[PunkX 75]

Nothing to debunk other than follow the boss. Because right is what he says it is. Disagree will get you fired.

Well, that's an opinion. Many will disagree, and may not share your view of getting "fired" - in any sphere.

This statement juxtaposes your stance of "we are in a democracy."

It sounds more like North Korea.

Liking the government is optional.

Irrelevant here. Liking or disliking a Government is moot. It does not make them impervious to criticism.

 

[TEUser2K1]

It's an unsubstantiated fear with no basis that only the uninformed and dim people believe.

I read the article you posted: https://thebulletin.org/2025/06/the...r-program-with-or-without-a-strike-on-fordow/
"although toxic chemicals and radiological contaminants may have been dispersed inside some of these facilities, including at the underground Natanz enrichment plant.":
"According to Grossi, no increase in radiation levels was measured outside of the damaged facilities"

How does contaminants gets contained inside a facility which is bombed to oblivioun ? Difficult to believe that Grossi, blr_p.
The last two paras also add more to the confusion.
Is it just sweet radiating propaganda because attack is by the bestest country in the world, or does not actually matter. This Grossi does not impress with such silly gross statements.

Bushehr is one to look out. But the Israelis will have planned for this. They are not going to cause another chernobyl

Lets hope so.

Only other possibility is nuclear material is secure with Iranian forces, so USA attack didn't change the overall situation much.

Russia's Medvedev: Countries to arm Iran with nuclear warheads | The Jerusalem Post

Medvedev suggested that the United States’ attacks on three sites in Isfahan, Natanz, and Fordow backfired, and led to the opposite result from what US President Donald Trump had set out to achieve.

www.jpost.com

 

[bssunilreddy]

I read the article you posted: https://thebulletin.org/2025/06/the...r-program-with-or-without-a-strike-on-fordow/
"although toxic chemicals and radiological contaminants may have been dispersed inside some of these facilities, including at the underground Natanz enrichment plant.":
"According to Grossi, no increase in radiation levels was measured outside of the damaged facilities"

How does contaminants gets contained inside a facility which is bombed to oblivioun ? Difficult to believe that Grossi, blr_p.
The last two paras also add more to the confusion.
Is it just sweet radiating propaganda because attack is by the bestest country in the world, or does it actually matter. This Grossi does not impress with such silly gross statements.

Lets hope so.

Only other possibility is nuclear material is secure with Iranian forces, so USA attack didn't change the situation much.

If US attack didn't result in destruction of the facility or its contents then Iran will speed up the process of making a nuke and use it on any of its adversaries which will ultimately bring WW3. So this is the 1st chain of events.
I am not saying not to destroy their facilities but should do it completely.