Israel Hezbollah Pager Attack.

RU vs UA war is fully depending on drones, to say otherwise will be merely wishful thinking and disingenuous towards oneself:
No it's just attacking hype spread by clueless fanboys.
From Ukraine to Myanmar, Drone Warfare Marks a Paradigm Shift
See what he says

On September 10, Ukrainian forces launched the largest drone attack of the war to date, targeting Moscow with 144 drones. The assault resulted in 20 drones being shot down, while several multi-story residential buildings near Moscow were set ablaze. Flights from Russia’s most important airports were temporarily suspended. In response, Russia launched a retaliatory strike using 46 drones.
Set ablaze? Temporary suspension of flights. Is that all. In comparison to an artillery barrage this is laughable in terms of damage. More like a nuisance.
The strikes from both sides highlight a now indisputable fact: drone warfare is playing a determining role in the Ukraine war.
What determining role? Nothing in this article backs up that assertion.

Does it help you take and hold territory? No. That's is what artillery along with an infantry does. That is what decisive, gamechanging or determining role means.

Use in Burma is fledgling and not meaningful at all.

Ukrainians are supposed to be using drones for close air support. Not mentioned in this article that seems more interested in numbers. A role that would typically be done by attack aircraft of various kinds.

So, are the Ukrainians going to be taking over Russian territory or winning back lost territory anytime soon? Nah

But every article written in the west wants you to believe that.

What determining role then does this dumbass author whose background & experience I am unable to determine mean?

Ukraine thrown into war's bleak future as drones open new battlefront
This bit

Almost none of this technology was here in Ukraine a year ago; now it is commonplace. Drones, which were once peripheral to the war, are a central component for both sides, alongside infantry and artillery as Ukraine struggles to hold back Russian advances.
Trying to make an equivalence here between drones and infantry/artillery? Lol

A more charitable interpretation would be drones are being used more now than a year ago. Close air support as I mentioned but drones have only a fraction of the attacking power as attack aircraft. Against small groups of people this can be effective but is useless against larger formations. Which is where the word decisive means something.


To hit deep inside Russia, Ukraine has built its own drones

Optic Fiber controlled FPV drones are ruling the war front now by avoiding remote / radio signal corruption, quite a development brought out by RU is this war.
All these western agencies exaggerate any tiny thing the Ukrainians do to the point you think the Russians will be defeated tomorrow :hilarious:
Few Indian companies are very much into building drones for defense use now, stock prices of such companies skyrocketed recent months due to expected support and requirement from Indian govt.
See this


Surveillance or against small groups of terrorists. Yeah?
 
All these western agencies exaggerate any tiny thing the Ukrainians do to the point you think the Russians will be defeated tomorrow :hilarious:
Russians started using Optic fiber remote controlled drones, it is massively successful.
For last few months, hundreds of videos from these drones and others are available on internet. You can see tanks and heavy artillery getting stupendously damaged from drone attacks. Don't know where you get your sources from.
Don't know how this war is going to end, but for now Russia have huge upper-hand, only time will say how war strategies will work out in future.
To sideline role of drones in this war and future ones will be massive mistake, the drone videos I see are showing a frightening perspective.
 
Russians started using Optic fiber remote controlled drones, it is massively successful.
If you watched the video above you would know what they are called and the obvious downsides.
For last few months, hundreds of videos from these drones and others are available on internet. You can see tanks and heavy artillery getting stupendously damaged from drone attacks. Don't know where you get your sources from.
Those are propaganda videos with no context but to tell you either one side or the other is losing. They could have been hit with any number of shoulder fired anti tank weapons. Why only attribute the damage to drones.

Didn't Hamas do this at the start? The workaround was a metal roof over the bulldozers and the drone attack was foiled.
Don't know how this war is going to end, but for now Russia have huge upper-hand, only time will say how war strategies will work out in future.
You got that right
To sideline role of drones in this war and future ones will be massive mistake, the drone videos I see are showing a frightening perspective.
Just put them in the right box. Drones have their uses. Pros and cons. But making them the star if the party means some agenda is being pushed isn't it.

Ukraine has not lost because the next series of game changing tech called drones has just arrived. Every previous entrant in the game changing category failed to live up to the name.

Did they do damage?yes
Kill Russians? Yes

But all put unable to alter the balance on the battlefield.

Keeps Ukraine in the fight? Yes

That is what these drones accomplish
 
Last edited:
Those are propaganda videos with no context but to tell you either one side or the other is losing.
The context is well explainable from the videos, well guided Russian drones (for eg., Lancets, new versions of cheaper ones, etc.) simply ripping off tank turrets, exploding fuel tanks, cooking insides, etc. Now all tanks are protected with metal web covering, rubber sheets, special materials, whatnot. Still causing serious damage. Other handheld kinds eerily entering buildings, attacking soldiers, etc. giving it a frightening dystopian sci-fi image. Seems you need some reassessment about this, I'll prefer not to post on this further because I feel there is some serious misunderstanding of what is going on.
btw, Hamas is not even an army but a gang of rouges compared to well known defense seller nation state Russia. Drone technology Russia uses is miles ahead.
 
The context is well explainable from the videos, well guided Russian drones (for eg., Lancets, new versions of cheaper ones, etc.) simply ripping off tank turrets, exploding fuel tanks, cooking insides, etc. Now all tanks are protected with metal web covering, rubber sheets, special materials, whatnot. Still causing serious damage. Seems you need some reassessment about this, I'll prefer not to post on this further because I feel there is some serious misunderstanding of what is going on.
Well there's any number of critiques as to how the Russians have deployed their tanks in this war.

Drone damage is only a limited component in that critique.

The site putting out photos of damaged Russian tanks early into the conflict was determined to be som euro intel agency spreading misinformation
 
Last edited:
Well there's any number of critiques as to how the Russians have deployed their tanks in this war.
Drones came into picture later to that fiasco, also different topic.
Also, the joke out there that best kept western tanks are now in Russian city displays is for a reason (drones played a role).
Drone damage is only a limited component in that critique.
Don't think regular work of drones like this 'limited', rather it's integral part: https://www.forbes.com/sites/davida...-a-mig-29-for-a-ballistic-missile-to-destroy/
General Petraeus: Use of drones transforms role of humans in Russia’s war in Ukraine: https://www.ukrainianworldcongress....rms-role-of-humans-in-russias-war-in-ukraine/
Russia to use AI to bolster Iranian Shahed-136 kamikaze drones: https://bulgarianmilitary.com/2024/...o-bolster-iranian-shahed-136-kamikaze-drones/
Future of military robotics: Russia, NATO, and China's impact: https://news.az/news/-future-of-military-robotics-russia-nato-and-china-s-impact-interview
Ukraine war: Russia launches drone strike on Kyiv - as commander 'sacked for lying about war progress' (Russia has used more than 800 guided aerial bombs and around 460 attack drones in the past week.): https://news.sky.com/story/ukraine-...sacked-over-lying-about-war-progress-13259841

Using optic fiber controlled UAVs gives clear color images, there are tons of those videos which are self explanatory.
 
Last edited:
Drones came into picture later to that fiasco, also different topic.
Also, the joke out there that best kept western tanks are now in Russian city displays is for a reason (drones played a role).
Point being people are thinking tanks are obsolete whose time is over? Complete nonsense.

Don't think regular work of drones like this 'limited', rather it's integral part: https://www.forbes.com/sites/davida...-a-mig-29-for-a-ballistic-missile-to-destroy/
Limited use. Only for surveillance. Iskanders did the rest. This is likely how the Indian military will be using drones. Surveillance & snooping.

General Petraeus: Use of drones transforms role of humans in Russia’s war in Ukraine: https://www.ukrainianworldcongress....rms-role-of-humans-in-russias-war-in-ukraine/
Not viewable on my IP
Future development. Come back when they deploy these AI drones.
He says

Drones and UAVs in this conflict play a critical role at the tactical, operational, and strategic levels, performing key tasks such as intelligence, surveillance, reconnaissance, target tracking and acquisition, one-way attacks, logistics, and communications missions. It is simply impossible to discuss or analyze this conflict without mentioning the pivotal role drones play. Russia is heavily investing in various drone capabilities.
That drones are used in all of those roles is without doubt. Question is this word 'critical'. Why use it?
However, the use of drones is increasingly met with countermeasures designed to neutralize UAVs or significantly reduce their combat effectiveness.
Exactly what the Israelis have shown. They use drones when needed in niche areas. They resort to airpower when required. One is not a substitute for the other.

So drones are peripheral or mostly in a supporting role for the IDF. Surveillance, logistics, the odd strike on a car or house here or there.

Therefore drones don't perform any critical role for the IDF.

Bear in mind the over reliance on drones is specific to Ru Ukr theater because the Russians are saving their airforce for a rainy day. And the Ukrainians don't have much of an airforce to speak of. So they rely on drones to achieve limited goals that their airforce would achieve more effectively and faster.

Azerbaijan /Armenia don't have an airforce worth much either. So yeah if you come from a country that has no airforce or cannot use it then drones are critical for your operations.

In other theaters where airforce won't be restrained the use of drones will be much smaller. Like for Israel. This what most people including yourself are missing.

I cannot imagine a scenario where India is unable to use its airforce against the Paks or the PLA. It would be interesting to imagine because that would be of great interest to the adversaries. How to prevent it happening and should it happen say in some limited way then what are the workarounds?

The IAF can dominate either PLA-AF or PAF maybe even simultaneously if at full strength. So preventing that would be a goal for the other side. If at all possible. I cannot see how.

This, in turn, has spurred major advancements in counter-countermeasures, including the development of fiber-optic-controlled drones and UAVs equipped with target tracking, terminal
I've already mentioned the down side of fiber optic control. Yes it prevents jamming but that comes with a tradeoff. Usable upto a point.
Ukraine war: Russia launches drone strike on Kyiv - as commander 'sacked for lying about war progress' (Russia has used more than 800 guided aerial bombs and around 460 attack drones in the past week.): https://news.sky.com/story/ukraine-...sacked-over-lying-about-war-progress-13259841
The 'guided aerial bombs' bit attracted more interest among the top brass here.

Using optic fiber controlled UAVs gives clear color images, there are tons of those videos which are self explanatory.
And the limitations of optic fiber controlled drones are?

Great for surveillance. Not knocking that.
 
Last edited:
And the limitations of optic fiber controlled drones are?
Are for short distance tactical attack, not for long distance.

Critical because opponents surrendering to drones more now because of how tactically those are used.

Powerful attacks from close range at heavily critical defense equipment is why drones are considered critical. Also helps focused attacks, sometime making equipment salvageable for the attacking force.
Every defense equipment is critical in given context, depends on how efficiently it's used.

The fact that India is spending billions and countries world over is hurrying to get their hands on this tech say something.
btw, UA started AI enabled drones earlier than RU.
 
Back
Top