Karnataka to ban Astrology-based TV shows

Status
Not open for further replies.
By this you mean to say, only that kills people has to be banned and Astrology is not harmful ??? Astrology is based on Non-sense and yet they can control every aspect of people's life from eating,sleeping and even when to F##K your women. Astrology ruins a person's life slowly & survives on Fear and Fatalism nothing else.
Tantriks -- I have no comments.
Again pure lack of knowledge, foolish assumption

Let me give you an example,
There's a clear rule in Astrology not to marry in the same "GOTHRAM" , it's considered a sin to marry the girl or boy of the same Gothram as yours, I always thought its absurd, until the medical school taught the perils of consanguinous marriage (marriage in first - second degree relatives) , which is associated with maximum incidence of genetically transmitted disease in the children born out of consanguinous marriage.
Avoiding the same Gothram is the astrology way of avoiding consanguinous marriage and avoiding inherited diseases; written in a era much before genetics was born.

Medicine is moving towards genetic evaluation for incidence of a disease to how a person responds to certain drugs. How same environmental influences bring about different attitudes and variations in the same set of individuals with different genetic make up. We could finally end up telling ' everything is predetermined' on the genetic basis of the individual at the birth itself.
Astrological principles were designed much before current scientific achievements were made, they had only fear of God and fear of unknown to make people follow certain principles of life to ensure a wellbeing of the individual. I don't see any wrong with that. Just don't discard an ancient science as illogical and irrelevant even before evaluating its merits in a unbiased manner. And political parties should be the last to decide on such matters.

My idea of super natural powers also revolves around the same thinking, probably we don't have enough technology to demonstrate the existence of a super natural power. Why can't you understand the fact that only a miniscule of percentage of electromagnetic spectrum is visible to our eyes, only miniscule of percent of frequencies we're able to hear, what if God communicates in some other frequency, some other spectrum which the current technology is unable to document & you need certain amount of spiritual elevation to experience it ?

Now coming to the OT, had we been debating validation of Astrology, before the mendelian theory of inheritance or when the perils of consanguinous marriage were not known, we could have banned avoiding same Gothram as nonsense.
BTW I'm a atheist for all practical purposes, but I'm open to the experience of a supernatural power if it is there somewhere.

Most important aspect of knowledge is knowing that, you don't know certain things - lack of knowledge in this aspect is glaringly evident in many of the arrogant posts, seen all throughout this forum ; which is disheartening.
 
I think you're not getting his point. Let assume you have 90% useless product in the cosmetic industry....we still have say 10% Clinically proven effective product. Same goes for Fitness supplements and so on.................
But can you say the same thing with the rudrakshas\astrology ??? 0.1% evidence that it works as they claim to be ???
So a 90% thief (cosmetics industry) should be spared when you compare with 100% thief (Rudraksh, Yantra industry etc) according to you? If you consider the shear turnover of cosmetics industry you'll understand who is a bigger thief & who should be banned first? What about the side effects of cosmetics? What about aerated drinks industry and it's advertisements?
There's something called as placebo effect which won't allow you to undermine Rudraksh etc as 100% ineffective.
 
Lol! Going by this, you post baseless hypocritical nonsense too. You should ban yourself!

I don't understand why you want to impose your views on others? If people believe certain ideologies, let them believe. They are not forcing them on you! But when the government tries to implement something constitutional, you cry intolerance? This is hypocrisy!!
I'm only stating scientific fact and it is also imperative tht any ideas scientific /non-scientific should not be immune to criticism. Talking about Impose/Indoctrination - people with faith-based belief system sort to this method always.

So a 90% thief (cosmetics industry) should be spared when you compare with 100% thief (Rudraksh, Yantra industry etc) according to you? If you consider the shear turnover of cosmetics industry you'll understand who is a bigger thief & who should be banned first? What about the side effects of cosmetics? What about aerated drinks industry and it's advertisements?
I never justified their actions. But again, you are proposing to BAN on an industry because some of the products are fake. Going by your logic, we have to shutdown everything and go back to stone age. Aerated drinks and Tobacco products are all harmful yet they exist because of us.
None of these comes under the bullshit category (Rudraksh, Yantra) though.

There's something called as placebo effect which won't allow you to undermine Rudraksh etc as 100% ineffective.
LOL I can sell my poop as medicine and claim it to cure your stomach pain. You can't deny my poop as 100% ineffective....can you ???? That how placebo effect works sometimes.

Again pure lack of knowledge, foolish assumption

Let me give you an example,
There's a clear rule in Astrology not to marry in the same "GOTHRAM" , it's considered a sin to marry the girl or boy of the same Gothram as yours, I always thought its absurd, until the medical school taught the perils of consanguinous marriage (marriage in first - second degree relatives) , which is associated with maximum incidence of genetically transmitted disease in the children born out of consanguinous marriage.
Avoiding the same Gothram is the astrology way of avoiding consanguinous marriage and avoiding inherited diseases; written in a era much before genetics was born.
Show me where it says so in your vedas ???? AFAIK gotram is a form of discrimination attempted by Brahmins and although it forbids marriage within same Gothram, it has never mentioned that it was to avoid diseases. They might have considered as taboo and you people try to fit that into modern parlance without any solid evidence.

Medicine is moving towards genetic evaluation for incidence of a disease to how a person responds to certain drugs. How same environmental influences bring about different attitudes and variations in the same set of individuals with different genetic make up. We could finally end up telling ' everything is predetermined' on the genetic basis of the individual at the birth itself.
Astrological principles were designed much before current scientific achievements were made, they had only fear of God and fear of unknown to make people follow certain principles of life to ensure a wellbeing of the individual. I don't see any wrong with that. Just don't discard an ancient science as illogical and irrelevant even before evaluating its merits in a unbiased manner. And political parties should be the last to decide on such matters.
Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence. Not just some poetic non-sense.

My idea of super natural powers also revolves around the same thinking, probably we don't have enough technology to demonstrate the existence of a super natural power. Why can't you understand the fact that only a miniscule of percentage of electromagnetic spectrum is visible to our eyes, only miniscule of percent of frequencies we're able to hear, what if God communicates in some other frequency, some other spectrum which the current technology is unable to document & you need certain amount of spiritual elevation to experience it ?
No one proved GOD and your other claims yet. Until that time, should we not allowed to be little skeptical ???? Instead we have already confirmed some supernatural power based on a BOOK. We are smarter than this, aren't we ???

Now coming to the OT, had we been debating validation of Astrology, before the mendelian theory of inheritance or when the perils of consanguinous marriage were not known, we could have banned avoiding same Gothram as nonsense.
BTW I'm a atheist for all practical purposes, but I'm open to the experience of a supernatural power if it is there somewhere.
Wait....wat ?

Most important aspect of knowledge is knowing that, you don't know certain things - lack of knowledge in this aspect is glaringly evident in many of the arrogant posts, seen all throughout this forum ; which is disheartening.
I don't think any religious people ever questioned their belief system.It is undoubtedly True because their belief says so. If one ask how and why...people get offended and call us arrogant.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Party Monger
This could be one of the best logical moves by the Karnataka govt. While atheists do not care this could spark an outrage from the hindu community who, more than anyone else, take the words of these astrologers to heart. There have also been many instances leading to killings/death on the words of these scums. "Your daughter will bring lots of suffering to your family if she marries that boy. Kill him/her". :|
 
  • Like
Reactions: Party Monger
Astrology is complete bullshit. But bannig is against the freedom of a civilians. This is same as banning beef. The same people who cried for beef bans, now seem to be happy with this move.

That is not correct, my fwiends.

Instead of banning it outright, they should educate people, tell them how its bullshit and let them decide. But you know, these lazy arses won't do that since its lots of work. So lets ban since it does not hold same view as mine. This is actually intolerance & censorship, if you ask me.
 
  • Like
Reactions: rdst_1
Astrology is complete bullshit. But bannig is against the freedom of a civilians. This is same as banning beef. The same people who cried for beef bans, now seem to be happy with this move.

That is not correct, my fwiends.

Instead of banning it outright, they should educate people, tell them how its bullshit and let them decide. But you know, these lazy arses won't do that since its lots of work. So lets ban since it does not hold same view as mine. This is actually intolerance & censorship, if you ask me.

You are speaking against bans. This is news!!
 
Your Vedas? Lol!!
Where are you from, planet Hypocritus?
Where are you from ?? Planet Trollass ?

Astrology is complete bullshit. But bannig is against the freedom of a civilians. This is same as banning beef. The same people who cried for beef bans, now seem to be happy with this move.
That is not correct, my fwiends.
Instead of banning it outright, they should educate people, tell them how its bullshit and let them decide. But you know, these lazy arses won't do that since its lots of work. So lets ban since it does not hold same view as mine. This is actually intolerance & censorship, if you ask me.
They are not same. Astrology is not completely banned, only the broadcasting on TV. The fact is, anything harmful that is inline with one specific religion/Caste will never be banned in this country.
Now compare that to Beef ban..you can't posses,sell,cook or eat as if it is cocaine...It is the direct result of Injecting one's religion/caste into politics and eventually onto everyone's life. Now who's hypocrite here ?

Check this Documentary made before the beef ban:
Got banned from screening lol.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Party Monger
Now compare that to Beef ban..you can't posses,sell,cook or eat as if it is cocaine...It is the direct result of Injecting one's religion/caste into politics and eventually onto everyone's life. Now who's hypocrite here ?
Lol! This directly shows how ignorant you are, giving a communal flavour to something constitutional.
As you might be knowing, which I severely doubt reading your posts on topics like these, India is an agarian nation where a lot of people directly depend on milch animals. Hence, it is mentioned in the article 48 of the Constitution that the state shall make an endeavor to protect cattle and milch animals considering the nature of our economy.

You however, give an communal angle to something you are not willing to accept. No wonder you hail from the mighty planet Hypocritus.
 
Astrology is complete bullshit. But bannig is against the freedom of a civilians. Instead of banning it outright, they should educate people, tell them how its bullshit and let them decide.
I want to disagree but you got a point. (y)
 
Lol! This directly shows how ignorant you are, giving a communal flavour to something constitutional.
As you might be knowing, which I severely doubt reading your posts on topics like these, India is an agarian nation where a lot of people directly depend on milch animals. Hence, it is mentioned in the article 48 of the Constitution that the state shall make an endeavor to protect cattle and milch animals considering the nature of our economy.
You however, give an communal angle to something you are not willing to accept. No wonder you hail from the mighty planet Hypocritus.
You have conveniently left out the killing,shaming & threatening by the politicians of one particular religion/caste if this beef ban is violated. Does this happen with any other ban ??? I have to LOL at your constitutional justification.

Anyways, don't derail & try to reason Astrology if you can.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Party Monger
you and your personal attacks/remarks.

Well, I attack hypocrites wherever I see them. I can't stand people who don't follow what they "preach", who change their views based on popular narratives/contexts. One should not meander his/her views conveniently.
 
You have conveniently left out the killing,shaming & threatening by the politicians of one particular religion/caste if this beef ban is violated. Does this happen with any other ban ??? I have to LOL at your constitutional justification.

Anyways, don't derail & try to reason Astrology if you can.

I am mentioning this umpteenth time maybe! India is a secular state according to the infamous 42nd constitutional amendment. The state shall allow people to follow a particular religion/belief till it is not encroaching upon the articles 15th and article 25th of the Constitution , that is the right to freedom of religion. So, if the Constitution allows a particular citizen to follow his beliefs peacefully, I don't know why the so called contextual aethists are against it. You think it is crap, don't go to an astrologer.why do you want to impose your views on others?

Your thoughts are no different than the caliphate(ISIS) where they force people to follow certain views/practices. Then you say the government is ignorant. This precisely is hypocrisy!
 
Well, I attack hypocrites wherever I see them. I can't stand people who don't follow what they "preach", who change their views based on popular narratives/contexts. One should not meander his/her views conveniently.
and yet you have not shown any reply/comment from me, to show my hypocrisy.
 
I am mentioning this umpteenth time maybe! India is a secular state according to the infamous 42nd constitutional amendment. The state shall allow people to follow a particular religion/belief till it is not encroaching upon the articles 15th and article 25th of the Constitution , that is the right to freedom of religion. So, if the Constitution allows a particular citizen to follow his beliefs peacefully, I don't know why the so called contextual aethists are against it. You think it is crap, don't go to an astrologer.why do you want to impose your views on others?
Your thoughts are no different than the caliphate(ISIS) where they force people to follow certain views/practices. Then you say the government is ignorant. This precisely is hypocrisy!

Do you even know the difference between imposing and criticizing views/idea ?? Or is the defensive strategy you use to safeguard your views from any form of scrutiny which might expose its flaws and sheer stupidity ??
 
Do you even know the difference between imposing and criticizing views/idea ?? Or is the defensive strategy you use to safeguard your views from any form of scrutiny which might expose its flaws and sheer stupidity ??
Criticism involves logic. Your views/posts are baseless and hateful. Outright banning of an existing concept based on some alien notions. Your views are akin to some extremist's view. You don't want to understand the counter narratives. You "bold" the text and put your ignorant views forward, on the face. All I say is one should understand both the narratives and then comment. However vague it may sound, if some people believe in it, and it is not harming you directly, you should not be so vociferous against it!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.