how the hell will op upgrade to ivy bridge with a mobo with h67 chipset?or any other chipset except z68?i just see so many guys around saying "take this and upgrade to ivy","upgrade to ivy",like its a fricking jingle bell.
Sudhanshu it seems that you haven't kept up with the times --> http://www.fudzilla....ith-h67-and-p67 / http://www.xtremesys...rd-and-PCIe-3.0 / http://www.anandtech...tecture-exposed.
Hope the above links are enough to convince you that Ivy-Bridge mainstream processors are going to keep all the previous generation LGA 1155 chipsets in vogue.
he wants good performance.of course i3 will perform better but it is so minimal i would take the 4100 all day long.and with the amd platform he also gets better features.so what everyone wants him to do is to take just a little better performance for sata 3 and some other features i have already painfully repeated a lot of times,it just doesnt make sense to me.
Again let us leave this to OP, his call on what to take. Most AMD processors get trashed by a puny Core i3 and it does it will sipping on less power, maybe for you USB 3.0 and SATA III are not a big deal for others who are assembling a current system it counts as essentials in my books as long as they are not paying a premium for the features, why quibble.
Decent Intel boards like the Intel DH67-BL offer all the above features for a reasonable price ~5400/-. I do not have any idea of the current penetration of AMD 9** series boards in the Indian market and what is their pricing. Honestly pairing a Bulldozer with an older generation chipset --> 890 / 880 series has no benefit and you might as well buy a AMD Thuban / Zosma / Deneb core with the older chips.
Maybe my thoughts makes no sense to you, but that is the glory of out motherland, free speech [for the most part]. If you do not agree let us part on good terms, instead of quarrelling for such frivolous matters.
and what of its full 4 cores damn it,and i hope you all realise that when games begin using all 4 cores and they will,the 4100 will **** around with the i3 and molest it ,and make a court case.
Okay I am still waiting for that day when, all cores are equally taxed by games unfortunately I am not seeing that any time soon, consider this since c. 2005 we have moved from dual-cores --> hex-core platform but no game [apart from a few exceptions like FarCry 2 and BioShock] has utilized these cores OR thread levels very efficiently.
Case in point the recent graphical behemoth, BattleField 3 --> http://www.guru3d.co...enchmark-test/3 / http://www.tomshardw...ce,3063-13.html.
While we are at it, your next theory of CPU bottlenecking GPU -- op will do fine with the cx430v2 with stock 4100 and still benefit more than he does with the i3.i dunno how appealing 3-4 fps more are when you are already going to get bottlenecked at the gpu lvl.
I think[font=Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif] #[/font][font=Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif]BIKeINSTEIN is running BF3 at pretty good settings with and Intel Pentium G620 + GTX 580, let him shed some light on the topic He had started a thread for the same so head over there -- .http://www.techencla...49#entry1689249.[/font]
You want OP to over-clock the FX-4100 to see gains unfortunately anything below the Seasonic S12II 520W will be unable to power this RIG in all honesty, especially when we are considering the facts --
- AMD FX processors start showing chronic mileage issues the moment you start tweaking their voltages and multipliers.
- Next up if you want to over-clock you need a decent air cooler, Cooler Master Hyper 212 EVO is the minimum OP will require, additional load on the poor CX V2 430W.
- No real IPC gains over a superior Intel architecture, performance still will not justify the costs involved.
i am a diehard intel fan but even i admit the amd makes more sense in ops price range.and also no mobo will let op get any RAM above 1333 MHZ UNTIL HE GETS ANOTHER PROCCY BECAUSE THE MEMORY CONTROLLER IS ON DIE,so MOBO DOESNT DO ANYTHING.
I've tried explaining plenty of people that buying 1333MHz RAM is seriously not worth it, especially for Intel processors and AMD Llano APU's in the face of these articles / arguments --> http://www.anandtech...g-the-best-ddr3 / http://www.xbitlabs....a2011-ddr3.html
[font=Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]Sandy Bridge's improved memory controller has all but eliminated the need for extreme memory bandwidth, at least for this architecture. It's only when you get down to DDR3-1333 that you see a minor performance penalty. The sweet spot appears to be at DDR3-1600, where you will see a minor performance increase over DDR3-1333 with only a slight increase in cost. The performance increase gained by going up to DDR3-1866 or DDR3-2133 isn't nearly as pronounced.[/font]
for the APU's memory scaling and improving graphics performance --> http://www.hardocp.c...83850_llano_apu / http://www.tomshardw...ano,2975-6.html.
[font=arial, sans-serif]We found that the memory bandwidth ranges from 13GB/s to 16GB/s with typical dual channel memory kits on our AMD A8-3850 APU and Gigabyte A75-UD4H motherboard. This difference doesn't sound that great, but a 3GB/s increase when dealing with 13GB is a very nice 23% performance increase. Most of this performance gain is seen when moving up from a 1333Mhz to a 1600MHz memory kit is where you'll see the largest performance jump.[/font]
Hope this sorts out any doubts you have Sire, Cheers!!
Also I request you again to PLEASE FORMAT your replies PROPERLY. It is a pain to sift through and to reply to your monolithic paragraphs.