iGo said:
@Dark Star: I DID read the link... but the fact is, OEM or Not, nVidia and their rebranding tactics are fact. You might say that because consumer are not directly buying this, so there isn't must misguiding going on... but for some poor chap buying pre-built system, he is going to think... "Oh wow.. GTS240, that's good"... thinking it's newer gen card, while it's clearly not.
then that poor chap cant be helped.
Now, when AMD Athlon II was launched after Phenom II, then the poor chap will think its newer gen and hence better than phenom II!?!?!? :S
Similarly, nvidia isnt fooling anyone, They placed it below the GTX series (to avoid Gen/architecture confusion) and even below the GTS 250 (to show inferior performance as compared to GTS250) because thats its correct position.
otpsurvive said:
I am starting to like ATI for their simplicity in their branding. A new series means a new architecture, not a rebrand of an old product. It is exactly like the metaphors of bikes, cars and whatever else mentioned by my fellow-members.
yea they dont re-brand.. they do something worse. underclocking and overclocking and releasing the same card for money. AFAIR they launched 4790 which was hell confusing as it wasnt on 4770 architecture.
http://www.techenclave.com/graphic-cards/ati-4790-a-138397.html..
And why was 4770 named in 47xx series when we know that its the latest 40nm architecture and DDR5 and hence way more advanced than 48xx!! why coudnt they name it 4930 or something!!!
Also, the no. of fillers launched within a short span of time was humoungous : 4670, 4730, 4770, 4790, 4830... now that the hell should one buy? they dont even know how to name the cards!!!