Storage Solutions Orico J-10 SSD
- Thread starter Skyh3ck
- Start date
View attachment 227138
Also, in this video you can see the speed falling after copying 200-300 GB. However, he is doing it on an empty drive. Once it is more than half full, the cache size keeps reducing until it falls faster to the actual NAND speed.
It's better/faster cousin O7000 post cache speed is 50-60MB/s so don't expect this ssd to have 100MB/s post cache speed. In fact if you look at that video carefully you can see the speeds dropping to even 15-20MB/s which is what should be expected on these drives where post cache avg speeds drop down to 50-60MB/s.
Everything else is good performance wise but a con & a big con at that, post cache speeds are hdd level.
Orico O7000 2 TB Review
The Orico O7000 uses the very popular Maxiotech MAP1602 controller, paired with QLC NAND, to build a highly affordable soild-state drive. The real-life testing in our review confirms: this is the fastest QLC based SSD, even beating most other TLC SSDs on the market.
Edit: Ordered & then cancelled after looking deeply into the reviews which led to the conclusion that avg write speed of 167MB/s to fill the entire drive while having cache speeds of 4.5GB/s means post cache speeds drop to double digits meaning native qlc flash has very poor quality write speeds. I could live with even hdd level...
Wasn’t that a momentary drop though? You can see the graph hovering around 150MBps.It's better/faster cousin O7000 post cache speed is 50-60MB/s so don't expect this ssd to have 100MB/s post cache speed. In fact if you look at that video carefully you can see the speeds dropping to even 15-20MB/s which is what should be expected on these drives where post cache avg speeds drop down to 50-60MB/s.
Everything else is good performance wise but a con & a big con at that, post cache speeds are hdd level.
Orico O7000 2 TB Review
The Orico O7000 uses the very popular Maxiotech MAP1602 controller, paired with QLC NAND, to build a highly affordable soild-state drive. The real-life testing in our review confirms: this is the fastest QLC based SSD, even beating most other TLC SSDs on the market.www.techpowerup.com
Edit: Ordered & then cancelled after looking deeply into the reviews which led to the conclusion that avg write speed of 167MB/s to fill the entire drive while having cache speeds of 4.5GB/s means post cache speeds drop to double digits meaning native qlc flash has very poor quality write speeds. I could live with even hdd level...
Also, all SLC SSDs drop to such speeds after cache is full. If your usecase requires >500MBps write speed always, why not look into TLC?
What you are describing is SLC SSD behaviour. Got nothing to do with this particular SSD.
That was a short duration test, my point was that if 15-20MB/s speeds are possible on a ssd even for a few seconds then that means its avg post cache speeds will most likely be around 50MB/s just like its better/faster cousin O7000 which is even worse than 100MB/s post cache speed of P3/P3 Plus.
Not all TLC drives have post cache speeds of more than 300-400Mb/s btw.
My point was, if getting worse speeds than P3/P3 Plus while all being QLC with crucial P3/Plus being much more established/reliable brand, what's the point in getting this orico drive not to mention full of hassles after sales support.
The post-cache speed depends on the quality of NAND. The Kioxia Exceria G2 for example doesn't really have good peak speeds for a Gen 3 drive, but it still writes at 700 MBps post-cache due to the BiCS NAND and of course the DRAM. Orico is only worth it if it is about 30-40% cheaper than competing products, otherwise no sense in going for this brand.