So my question is if not modi then who?
There are few, Naveen Patnaik, Kejriwal but again - no national presence for both. So when it comes to national, it's pretty much modi vs Raga. Next yr, it will be again Modi, but he will be the face of elections only. He'll resign prolly in a year of becoming PM again and leave the reigns to may be Rajnath or Yogi or Gadkari(my personal fav). Btw why you think modi is completely different if I may ask?
Remove the cancer first!!
I thought we did that already in 2014 and again in 2019. Not really pointing a person, but it's congress party that is the cancer. I am not really saying "BJP is doodh ki duhli" but when it comes to lesser evil, it's BJP not congress.
Can anybody please explain what the hell is this toolkit thing?
Some kind of fight fire with fire ( fire= propaganda/ lies whatever 56 incher is known for)
Forgot to answer your main question abt toolkit, so here it is. As you already are against BJP/Modi, Let me tell you the story as I see it. You won't like it, but it's an another view for you. (if you are open to another view).
BJP (sambit patra) posted a document of 4 pages. The document list many things, among major were "attack Hindu's kumbh mela but don't attack/comment for EID". This basically goes against the constitution of course but also against the congress's ideology which they always advertise as "Secular" but in reality is a Muslim appeasement party (I am not against Muslims, some of my best friend's are Muslims and my 7 yro gf is also Muslim). Also, the document said to occupy beds by congress party workers so that people die and Modi get's a bad image/name which is very criminal in nature.
Anyways, this document was claimed by congress as "Fake" without any proof which basically means it is hearsay(their words against bjp's document).
Altnews, a propaganda website which works with any party as long as it is against BJP, made an article saying the document had different word Hence FAKE. Problem is, different font can be done in few seconds in word, so it really doesn't mean it is fake and that fact-check really wasn't a fact check.
Now why BJP supporters think it is real is because it is something they have seen it happening since 1 month. Twitter trends(attacking kumb), and international journalists attacking modi/india/bjp/rss for COVID. This was seen by me aswell from a month or so, as it seemed a collective attack/effort/planning from congress to do that. When this document came out, it was exactly what BJP supporters saw happening, so that's the reason why most think the document is real and the proof whoever (altnews/congress) claiming to be fake is wrong.
Then Congress leaders sent a letter to Twitter saying that document is wrong by quoting altnews article as evidence. Twitter took it as face value and labelled those documents as "misinformation".
Congress put a FIR to Delhi Police to investigate this as congress didn't have proof themselves apart from the altnews article's proof which is not sufficient. Delhi Police bcoz of Congress's FIR went to Twitter's office to give them a notice (official statement- make of what you will) as standard practice and wanted to ask twitter to send the proof of that miss-info document as Twitter labelled it. So if Twitter labelled it, they must be having a proof right? Twitter didn't gave any proof neither by communication or letter. So Twitter's miss-information label still doesn't make sense.
The whole think become hearsay and everyone saying onus to show proof lies with altnews, twitter and congress. but all 3 are saying onus to show proof that document is real lies on BJP. If someone here is a lawyer, he might be able to clear this as to who's this onus lies on (without being bias).
Then there's IT regulations 2021 GOI issued, but back in Feb'21 but that's a completely different story which somehow got involved in this controversy aswell.
I would say, if the case was filed by congress, then either congress show the proof or altnews or Twitter as whoever files an FIR must have a valid reason.
BJP on the other side if we take their story as fact and truth(For a minute here), then obviously it makes sense that BJP has a guy inside congress who leaked this document to BJP. BJP used it and if Police asks BJP to give out the witness, they might , or they might not. If they give out the witness, then the guy's life can be in danger (by Congress people), so BJP might not wanna reveal their source, but if push comes to shove, BJP might reveal their source in court.
Interesting thing to note here is, congress has taken the FIR out from Delhi police and put a similar FIR in congress ruled state of Chhattisgarh. What's going on here? Is there a bias in Police? If you say yes, then the outcome of Chhattisgarh can be biased, and if you say No bias in police, then congress withdrawing the FIR means they are full of shit.
