Here. It has been edited. https://techenclave.com/threads/pro...ng-indian-map-in-its-apps.219518/post-2520480Where
Not you. The same post I have linked to.Have I done that? I don't know any other way to answer your question then.
Definitely.It's probably an oversight which should be brought to their notice.
I wish to know about the history of this.Nehru's idea of going to the UN was to get international recognition of J&K as part of India. In effect reverse the decision to award entire J&K to Pakistan.
Otherwise it would look like an Indian land grab and bring into question the legitimacy of whatever parts of J&K India held at that point. The Brits drew the borders so who's to say the Indians wouldn't violate them again and claim more elsewhere.
A ceasefire was agreed at the UN and after a plebiscite was to be held. Before the plebiscite was to take place. The Pak side had to withdraw their forces first followed by the Indian side. Well, the Pak side never withdrew and that's where the matter ended. Thereby allowing India to remain in J&K as the terms of holding the plebiscite were never complied with by Pakistan.
So the reality is Pakistan failed to abide by the conditions of the plebiscite, an important fact they always forget to mention when claiming the entirety of J&K and saying plebiscite was never held and needs to be held now after they demographically re-engineered their part with Punjabis.
WHO map shows J&K, Ladakh separate from India - WHO maintained that it follows guidelines set by the United Nations regarding maps
WHO map shows J&K, Ladakh separate from India
www.deccanherald.com
This is the world map hosted on UN:
I am confused. What exactly is the UN resolution? That J&K are separate from India? If no, then how did WHO come up with that narrative?
Last edited: