2:30 - that raytheon plane is not with India. only uk has it.
He never mentions ratheon. He mentions a bombardier
plane with a radar on its belly. What radar is for him to clarify. How do you know we do not have this capability ?
That is what you imply. Ratheon or nothing. Well, this is why i said more clarification from him is required.
3:10 onwards - he says they're using Schmidt Cassegrain type of astronomy telescopic lens to see for bodies (from where?) and gives a figure of 35-40.
- he conveniently forgot his first line of reasoning of satellite not being able to take pics because it was too cloudy.
So how did a non existent plane take pics of the place deep inside mountains at night time when it is heavily dependent on light entering the system to get an image?
And he says the problem is such systems are they are heat sensitive. At 40000 feet (just 9K below ceiling of the Raytheon) the air is really cold and shouldn't be too much of a problem I think. The Everest is at around 29K feet and is below freezing. Even at 29K feet there are lots of clouds. Lots of Everest pics with clouds below the peak floating around internet. There are clouds even below that height on other smaller mountains.
The figure of 35-40 comes from Francesca's interviews with contacts on the site who saw those people being taken away in ambulances. Already posted her interview with WION here. That is the primary open source info for casualty numbers.
He then mentions reconnaissance pods using these telescopes. How far off could those see when up in the air ? Did they have to cross the LoC to get images. These would be aircraft flying high i imagine not drones.
He says we used these various ways to figure out the casualties. Bodies going cold won't show up etc. implies some sort of IR capability. Do our satellites have this ability ? maybe. Cloud cover won't affect IR.
3:52 - he says Pakistan army burnt or disposed of bodies in a river.
- there is no river nearby in the area of that bombardment even in the pics you showed posted by NDTV. Burning and throwing bodies in river is not a Muslim way of cremating dead people, so only way is to bury the bodies somewhere and the closest place is that same place. which Pak army is refusing access to.
Yes, there is
Kunhar river
This is neither here nor there. The job of the Paks is to disappear those bodies and ensure they aren't found. They were taken away with ambulances meaning they are not going to be buried anywhere close by to where they were found.
4:15-4:20 - talking about ground based asset or small aerial asset (drone?)
- India doesn't have a drone capable of going 200KM in a mountainous region. You need direct line of sight to keep control of a drone at that distance. Most drones have GPS built into them so if they loose connection with ground control they return back to home base. They don't go flying out of control and certainly cannot go deep inside mountains etc where it is windy. Even helicopters have a bad time landing in mountains due to unpredictable windy conditions. I highly doubt any drone was involved here.
- Indian Airforce said they took intelligence input of mobile phones being active in that area from satellite. So he is directly conflicting IAF and govt intelligence agency.
'intelligence driven implies we've got spies there. When to hit, when not to hit and what happened after. It's an either or. Drone or spies. He's speculating here.
10:15 - brags about talking to Indian and Pentagon sources etc
lol yeah. Why would they talk to some nobody no name self bragging military enthusiast who does not know what military aircraft India has? Getting lots of military info wrong too. So I doubt anyone will take this guy seriously or even take time to talk to him. Hell, even Indian people would kick this guy out in a minute after they see through his bullshit talk. And why would they talk to a civilian about some highly sensitive military info which this guy is spewing around on youtube like a dam leaking water? No dumb person would give any info to this guy.
The military gives out info in a very piece meal way whenever they see fit. This guy can read much more into what they say than others i've found. He has his connections and i suspect they are more than other journalists as he's abroad a lot.
What i take exception to is your and that other guy's insinuation that Iyer is talking BS or worse intentionally misleading people ala fake news. He posted a
100+ tweet thread explaining and debunking a lot of stuff that came out in social media from our media sources & pak sources right through this whole affair. Who else has done that ? On social media you get caught out quick. So it takes a lot of knowledge and confidence. The exact opposite of what you think of him.
Here he is at it
again. Paks are trying to pass off that all four missiles on the captured Mig21 are intact hence never fired therefore no F16 kill. He's calling them out. Is that BS too ?
Check out his
profile
13:15 - confirms that the Italian journo and some other of his friends and their sources confirmed significant ground damage
- Same place that the Pak army has restricted access to from 200+ meters away in all directions? How? Can they shape shift into eagles and go and see the damage for themselves or do they have telescopic eyes and saw from some place nearby?
She confirmed casualties by seeing ambulances. Implying there was damage. Why else would these casualties be there in the first place then. What is the problem here ?
How all people attending to these casualties had to surrender their phones were being carried out etc.
Pakistan having good Indian press and printing almost genuine Indian currency was true. There was news reports of Pakistan printing 500 and 1000 rupees notes and sending those through Nepal and Bangladesh and smuggling them into India through sleeper agents.
What he says about the economic implementations is true. All of them poorly thought of and badly implemented.
See this news article about the demo effects in Kerala
https://scroll.in/article/916994/no...on-deal-triple-blow-to-keralas-labour-economy
Why i said you hadn't heard all of it is there were parts i knew you would agree with but only mention till now
In the comments section people were objecting to him mixing defence, economics & politics. They were expecting just defence. Well the guy knows about more than just defence.
I don't know how to contact him for clarifications. He does not even mention this talk in this twitter page. He won't answer comments in youtube.
He made one bold prediction that surprised me. It's a guess. JeM have been set back at least 3 -5 yr as a result of this strike. That's easy to test. If the Paks hit us in the future and it turns out it was JeM then questions will be asked. Did we inflict as much damage to them or not. Now, the thing here is the Paks want us to believe that. According to them we only killed a crow
After the first raid in 2016, it took just one month for Nagrota. So can we expect something a month later from Feb 26 ? let's see.
IAF chief mentioned operations are still ongoing. There are no contacts but both militaries are still on high alert.
https://economictimes.indiatimes.co...terror-camps-to-fata/articleshow/68490562.cms