And Westmere is just Nehalem + AES. Yes i know sandy bridge is also 32nm based but its a new core which is rumoured to be ~20% better clock for clock. The highest one is equal to a 45nm i7 at stock. There have been reports of reaching 4.8 ghz+ on air with sandy bridge. And its been proven that triple channel vs dual channel dosent really improve performance more than 1-2%, if at all. Dual channel is more than enoughUdit said:980x isn't Nehalem it's a 32nm Westmere
sandy bridge is a 32nm processor too
also the P67 Sandy Bridge are old dual channel tech based & the highest one is equal to a 3.4GHz 45nm i7
don't worry we'll buy the X68 32nm Sandy Bridge or X68 22nm Ivy Bridge Octa Core too
no tech passionate guy thinks about being ok for 2-3 years as we get bored in 1yr
You might get bored in a year and keep upgrading. But, practically speaking the i7-980x does not make sense as it is a $999 processor, not a $300 one. How many applications/games even use quad cores nowadays? It is simply a waste of money unless you have nothing better to do with it
Anyway i repeat, In My Opinion it is not a good idea. I would suggest either a Sandy bridge quad(which is actually what i am personally going to do) or waiting till bulldozer and sandy bridge hex/octa core if you really want more than 4 cores(and quad channel memory). If the OP wants to buy the 980x then by all means let him go ahead.