Yes, that's true. But that doesn't make the camera itself better. And a person who understands photography can take advantage of this and bring out the difference using a DSLR.What appears better to the eyes, and closer to what our eyes see - is the one that will be preferred.
You are right about using algorithm on cameras, but who is gonna sit on desktop and do stuff these days?
Last year during my engagement, due to covid related issues, we couldn't manage a photographer. So I handed over my DSLR to my cousin and asked her to take a few pictures. We were sitting on a sofa which had a textured single colour cover. Most phone camera photos of the sofa made it look like a plain fabric, making the sofa look very bad. But the DSLR picture easily captured the texture and the sofa looked much better. And this was when:
- The camera was in the hand of someone who had held a DSLR for the first time that day (with about 10 minutes of training from me, a beginner)
- There was no tripod
- The lighting was improper
- It's an entry level DSLR (Canon 200D)
- With one the cheapest lenses from Canon's stable (Canon EF-S 24mm f/2.8 STM Lens)