Doesn't fix the root cause. And if this is the option taken, we would better be resigned to more Pahalgams.
Depends what your expectations are.
For instance do you think the Balakote strike served the purpose?
We took out over two hundred operatives with their trainers because we had Intel they were preparing to infiltrate. That's a heavy blow which will take years to recover from in terms of personnel.
This bought us six years of peace. Was that an acceptable duration?
For a change instead of the world saying India should show restraint the narrative flipped and the pressure from external actors was put on Pakistan to show restraint. That our pilot who took out an F16 was returned in 48h just goes to show the pressure put on them.
The attack complicated war planning for pindi. Earlier India wouldn't respond or did so in a non obvious and smaller scale way. This time we literally bombed within Pakistan proper. Big difference in posture there not to mention confidence.
I expected future Pulwamas but they would be few and far apart. And not the kind earlier that were frequent because that maintains momentum among the separatists and boosts their morale. Whereas now this is a desperate attempt to restart affairs again.
What are the chances of that happening? Not very good. In some ways abrogating 370 took the wind out of the movement I suspect for good.
Also they didn't target state actors which was the MO for a decade. That is curious. After 26/11 their focus moved away from civvies and towards either police or the army. See Uri or Pathankot.
Your turn but you need to look away from quick fix/permanent fix like solutions. For one you break it you own it. We don't want that.