That's a perfectly shitty review, pardon me.Z-580s arent exactly reference speakers. Some studio monitors should be used for benchmarking at least.
This comparison @ 16/44.1 is a joke.
http://www.techreport.com/reviews/2005q4/soundblaster-x-fi/index.x?pg=10
Audigy 2 cannot be better than a Revo since the Revo does not resample on it's native mode.
I wouldnt prefer buying a x-fi for music. The fact is that, despite creative's claims of a high dynamic SSRC, it still RESAMPLES ! I feel cheated with creative's claims of coming up with non-resampling core.
IXBT's review says that the driver options shows the option of 44.1 khz in analogue output mode, but it fails to see that there are only two options in the digital out mode - 48 khz and 96 khz. This means that the core is uncapable of doing a true 44.1 khz, and the analogue mode is a resampled mode.
X-fi uses a bad analogue output stage, perfectly comparable to an audigy 2 level card, and isnt any better. It isnt comparable to a Professional card.
This comparison @ 16/44.1 is a joke.
http://www.techreport.com/reviews/2005q4/soundblaster-x-fi/index.x?pg=10
Audigy 2 cannot be better than a Revo since the Revo does not resample on it's native mode.
I wouldnt prefer buying a x-fi for music. The fact is that, despite creative's claims of a high dynamic SSRC, it still RESAMPLES ! I feel cheated with creative's claims of coming up with non-resampling core.
IXBT's review says that the driver options shows the option of 44.1 khz in analogue output mode, but it fails to see that there are only two options in the digital out mode - 48 khz and 96 khz. This means that the core is uncapable of doing a true 44.1 khz, and the analogue mode is a resampled mode.
X-fi uses a bad analogue output stage, perfectly comparable to an audigy 2 level card, and isnt any better. It isnt comparable to a Professional card.