Darky said:Portrait
As I've requested earlier also multiple times that please either retain the exif data with the picture or mention the details here,Aces170 said:
otherwise it's more of show-off thread
The Photography Thread !
- Thread starter Shripad
- Start date
otherwise it's more of show-off thread
harish_21_10
Adept
Its just beautiful.Stuge said:Back from Kerala Trip
Tobbaco GND + 0.6 GND
--- Updated Post - Automerged ---
Guys I need advice regarding taking pics in broad daylight. Today I went for a ride and was clicking some shots of my friends and the problem was, when they stand in the shade the background gets overexposed. The background being filled with light due sunlight. I tried different aperture and exp settings but then not all the shots were satisfactory.
I feel I am screwing up with the metering mode. Could that be the problem or will a good UV filter be able to fix this?
jit_devil2
Disciple
manali
jit_devil2
Disciple
harish_21_10
Adept
harish_21_10 said:
No one to advice me on this?
I was reading through articles related to Polarizing filters and it will be able to fix the issues that I have mentioned. Do advice.
Aces170
ex-Mod
^^ Yes polarizing filters would do the trick, yet I would suggest using the gradient tool to selectively under expose the area. It worked wonders for me. BTW do post a hi-res pic, will try to check if PPing improves the effect (RAW files are the best as they retain almost all the details...)
harish_21_10
Adept
^^
I dont wanna use PPing all the time..I prefer getting it right while taking the pictures...atleast for now, since I am still learning..
I was looking at polarizing filters and found the Hoya brands to be good but a little more expensive. How are the Marumi filters? Not sure if these are multicoated though.
I dont wanna use PPing all the time..I prefer getting it right while taking the pictures...atleast for now, since I am still learning..
I was looking at polarizing filters and found the Hoya brands to be good but a little more expensive. How are the Marumi filters? Not sure if these are multicoated though.
Sudarshan_SMD
Adept
The Free Leap by Sudarshan_SMD, on Flickr
harish_21_10 said:
For P&S camera, I use flash in such conditions.
harish_21_10
Adept
I did use flash and helped in certain situations but not when the subject was beyond flash range.
Can you post some of your bad pics with their exif info, then only one can comment on improvement.harish_21_10 said:
IIRC UV filters will not add to your photos only they are a protective gear for your lens. CPL (polarizing filters) are useful but you need to learn their use.
Aces170
ex-Mod
harish_21_10 said:
Actually for this issue, I would prefer PPing. Polarizing filters will give you a different output from what you desire, and its good only if you want that contrasting look.
Getting it right at the source, would entail reducing the exposure bias. As I said again, if you click in RAW loss of details due to over-exposure is low, the loss of detail due to under-exposure is higher. Hence if no choice is available, I would prefer over-exposing.
My two cents: if you are learning, dont give too much attention to technical details, especially the ones which can be corrected in software. I would put all my effort in getting the framing and composition right. Although I am not a fan of Ken Rockwell, do go through his article on framing and composition. Once you have started using the camera frequently, then try multiple bracketing options, and fidgeting in full manual settings. Technical details can be learned easily over time, but if you do not pay attention to the basics of framing and composing early on, you will find it hard to learn it later on.
Post the pic.
harish_21_10
Adept
medpal said:
I did read through articles and lot of forum topics related to CPL and feel that it could be the solution. But then need your suggestions first. Here are some pics that should be able to explain my concern.
Picasa Web Albums - Harish - Xbhp Meet
Picasa Web Albums - Harish - Xbhp Meet
Picasa Web Albums - Harish - Xbhp Meet
Picasa Web Albums - Harish - Xbhp Meet
Picasa Web Albums - Harish - Xbhp Meet
Picasa Web Albums - Harish - Xbhp Meet
harish_21_10
Adept
All the pics were shot in Aperture Priority mode at f5.6, except for this one:Picasa Web Albums - Harish - Xbhp Meet , Which was shot at f8 and hence resulte in the subject skin tone looking much darker.
ISO for all was set to lowest, that being 100.
ISO for all was set to lowest, that being 100.
Aces170
ex-Mod
Lower the exposure bias a notch, and check. Or if you have the RAW file, just lower the exposure when you load the image into any image conversion software.
BTW dont expect any miracle pictures in the harsh light. The polarizing filter might help compensate the landscape exposure, but human subjects will appear under-exposed IMO. Just check with someone who have polarizing filters before making a decision.
BTW dont expect any miracle pictures in the harsh light. The polarizing filter might help compensate the landscape exposure, but human subjects will appear under-exposed IMO. Just check with someone who have polarizing filters before making a decision.
harish_21_10
Adept
Unfortunately I dont know anyone who would have a polarizing filter.
I did try lowering the exposure bias but then resulted in underexposed subjects. Looks like I will have to take a plunge into polarizing filters myself. Anyways, thanks for your help mate. Any further inputs are appreciated.
I did try lowering the exposure bias but then resulted in underexposed subjects. Looks like I will have to take a plunge into polarizing filters myself. Anyways, thanks for your help mate. Any further inputs are appreciated.
Outdoor portraits are best shot in soft light in the evening. I wouldn't waste my time trying to shoot in such harsh sunlight.
http://img443.imageshack.us/img443/3706/dsc00272z.jpg
http://img443.imageshack.us/img443/3706/dsc00272z.jpg