Warhead won't be a GPU slayer
- Thread starter hatter
- Start date
- Status
Like with every high profile game there will be people who like it and some who dislike it 
Did every one like DOOM 3
Did every one like Age of Mythology (Just because AOE was around )
and the list will go on and on so no point fighting about it
Lol and I like Dark Messiah which i am sure more than 90% people would have hated
Did every one like DOOM 3
Did every one like Age of Mythology (Just because AOE was around )
and the list will go on and on so no point fighting about it
Lol and I like Dark Messiah which i am sure more than 90% people would have hated
YoGi-Sama
Galvanizer
To tell you the truth, the first game I personally bought was Quake3 (Q3 Gold).
That game, still remains my most fav/most played game... ever.
Even after all these years, the game offers tremendous replay value and fun. Sure the graphics are quite old, but they don't look ugly.
The only game that made big impact on me after Q3, has to be Gears of War. Awesome gameplay, great graphic and engaging fights. (I played the game start to end about 11 times by now, just for the kick of shooting those damn locusts).
Now, I haven't played Crysis... but if it's anything like Far Cry in terms of gameplay then I'm sure it will be a short term novelty. Far Cry was great looking game, no doubt about it. But it lost me after mid-game. After those stupid monsters were unleashed in game the gameplay was shot to hell.
I think the visual aspect of the game shouldn't be as important as gameplay part. Gameplay, then visuals and then rest of the gimmickry like physics etc. should be the priority order. Just my two cents.
That game, still remains my most fav/most played game... ever.
Even after all these years, the game offers tremendous replay value and fun. Sure the graphics are quite old, but they don't look ugly.
The only game that made big impact on me after Q3, has to be Gears of War. Awesome gameplay, great graphic and engaging fights. (I played the game start to end about 11 times by now, just for the kick of shooting those damn locusts).
Now, I haven't played Crysis... but if it's anything like Far Cry in terms of gameplay then I'm sure it will be a short term novelty. Far Cry was great looking game, no doubt about it. But it lost me after mid-game. After those stupid monsters were unleashed in game the gameplay was shot to hell.
I think the visual aspect of the game shouldn't be as important as gameplay part. Gameplay, then visuals and then rest of the gimmickry like physics etc. should be the priority order. Just my two cents.
Blade_Runner said:Wow ! 1024x768 and 1280x720 are going to put out the same fps ! Pray tell me how a narrower resolution is gonna put out more fps when the latter clearly has to render more geometry ?
Thanks but i rest my case. It would have been a good discussion/argument if your points were more objective than your own opinions.
dude i know that at 1280 x 720 more pixels are rendered.
I jus said at those res its always above 25.
(which means that it may be min 30fps at 1024x768 and min 25 at 1280x720 res) :cool2:
ya.... it was always a discussion for me..never argument..jus giving point on why i thought so about the the game, instead of picking out trivial faults in others posts.
i gave reasons on why i thought it has the most impressive physics till date along with in game vids to show what i was trying to say.
also told the reason why i think its AI is impressive..although a little buggy at times.
and all everyone else is writing is that ohh that AI is not good and the physics is not impressive..have seen such physics before.
U need to tell why u think so.
and Finally i get accused of not been objective
and about scalability of the engine it still works fine even on a 8400M GS.
and can give 20+fps all most all the time and still looks gr8.
YouTube - Crysis Dell M1330 8400m GS Camera shot
and can give 20+fps all most all the time and still looks gr8.
YouTube - Crysis Dell M1330 8400m GS Camera shot
arnold said:
20+ fps at all times? I could see 12fps scenarios in those jungle scenes.
And besides they havnt even tried the snow scenes. Then it would probably be < 5 fps.
No kidding but with the 8400GS and at the lowest settings, farcry would probably look better then Crysis with it(ofcourse farcry at near high settings)..
- Status