What exactly is Government of India doing?

lol, some people are only here for these political threads itself. With no disrespect, i hardly ever see any of them contribute or even talk anything related to tech unless politics are somehow involved in it again

Yep, there are quite a few of those and I'd say 90% of their posts are non tech related.
What GOP, they are dead as far as the people who voted for them.

And very convenient of you to mention BLM protest but completely ignore attack on Capitol building, as encouraged by Donald Trump.

No offense but I'd say foreigners are as clueless about Indian politics as much as Indians are clueless about the political affairs in other countries.
What you hear and see on the media is not indicative of actual things happening on the ground so you guys arguing about politics in the USA is like some rednecks in Alabama arguing about Indian politics, which you have to agree is a total waste of time.
Your entire arguments would be based on biased sources just like we have our own, they too have their own animal farms/echo chambers that people latch onto based on their political leanings.
 
Last edited:
And very convenient of you to mention BLM protest but completely ignore attack on Capitol building, as encouraged by Donald Trump.

Cool story bro.

And very convenient of you to mention attack on Capitol building but completely ignore attacks by BLM rioters and looting, as encouraged and supported by the democrats.

Cool story bro
Yep, there are quite a few of those and I'd say 90% of their posts are non tech related.

Just in case if anyone has confused me on this, You can check my posts of 8 pages of my total content posted on TE or all my posts. I'd say hardly 20-30%. are political and most are tech related.

As per your other points, I totally agree for foreign politics.

dont want to but sometime people cross the line by abusing ( even racially ) , name calling again and again etc. We have most reports sent to mods from this thread than any other thread.
we have been patient with some warnings here and there and let the discussions flow. Earlier, threads would be locked and members banned no questions asked.
Hoping people read your message again and again and the rules thread now and then to get some clarity around discussions

This post https://techenclave.com/threads/wha...nt-of-india-doing.191779/page-62#post-2248949 qualifies for name calling and abuse and clearly have crossed all lines.

Though, I appreciate the TE mods alot that have shown quite alot of patience in these heated discussions. These kind of heated discussions if done at IBF or r/india gets a ban hammer always for the RW and never for Left's. Thanks again for not showing bias and letting the conversations flow. I can't imagine how hard it would be to control a thread such as this.

Right, Hungary and Turkey, currently the most model nations on planet.

And funding BLM is a bad thing... if you believe American white supremacists. Stop guzzling Republican party's talking points and start thinking by yourself.

Right, first defend your opinion by comparing the ethics of nations and then doing whataboutism for the US. I was quite accurate in saying "The same people here who has problem with Godi media (mainstream media of India) are very happy and satisfied with the mainstream media (democrat left slided FAKE NEWS) of the US. Hypocrites isn't?"

However, a certain individual(s) in this forum will ignore this news, saying that Soros has funded the EIU and this is a global conspiracy against India. Can't beat that mastermind Soros.

Right, so ignore so many Govt's who have banned Soros evil NGO's in questions with so many references including the biggest from Reuters but sure, let's change the topic and say something bad abt india, coz you wanna argue just coz you wanna.

Honestly just ban the bhakts from this forum and move on.

and then when This Govt talks about banning twitter, you are the kind of people who cry afoul. But yeah, let's ban and create an echo chamber. Heights of hypocrisy. Let me very bluntly state, while you have a right to an opinion. I have a right to have an opinion on your opinion.

Btw, your abusing language has certainly reached a peak on this post and I have resisted myself by not following your footsteps as the kind of language you have used just goes to show the kind of upbringing you have had.

That kind of thinking is very much in line with Modi's Standard Operating Procedure.

Agreed but This Govt never called for twitter ban, it has resisted quite alot and the question was only for a hashtag used #modiplanninggenocide , This was honestly a pathetic hashtag and I could imagine the patience level this Govt had, but when you start a campaign with that kind of hashtag, which is neither true, nor done and even if done, Modi will be kicked out of the Govt by his own supporters including myself. So, this was totally about fake news. Now some journalists and even the kissanmorcha twitter handle used those hashtag's themselves which were called for ban by MeitY later on was quite justified. You want to do campaign, sure go ahead, but when you are doing that kind of hashtag which is neither true nor ever gonna happen, then you are asking for it.

IMO political discussions should be banned on a forum named Techenclave,

If you want to indulge in these discussions or hang around in echo chambers there are other avenues like r/india or r/indiaspeaks for e.g, where you can spend hours arguing with strangers on the internet.

As long as we can keep away from abusive content, and name calling, I think it can work fine and if someone is not interested in giving his opinion then he can stay away from this thread entirely.

We don't want TE to be an echo chamber (we already have a echo chamber for twitter in the US for left's) and we already have enough of these in online as well as digital/cable/paper publications/broadcasters.

If one person can get so hyper that he starts abusing in a political discussions, may be political discussions isn't meant for him.

Fine example his AOC, she wants to make a list of people who ever worked with Trump and to Ban them from working in any company ever again. John Branon the former NSA or CIA wants to send people who didnt vote for the democrats to re-education camps his lists includes even libertarian and nativists. This is the same guy who lied under oath that us doesnt spy on its citizens, he doesn't want Snowden or Julian Assange to ever walk free.

The hypocrisy of Left's in case of Edward Snowden and Assange is mind numbingly staggering. We all know Obama is a war criminal compared to Trump who never waged a war of declared one. He has ignited few to keep leverage and that's what a leader does. Other democrat's showed a video of Trump telling his supporters to go to Capitol but edited the part when he said "peacefully". Though Trump made one big mistake in not pardoning Assange and Snowden, shows he wanted to protect his vote bank rather than doing the right thing, he is no saint either.

To name a few for height of hypocrisy in Biden's admin - He said in 2012 that US will leave Afghanistan in 2014 but now says more troops will be deployed. Such are these war criminals. Obama being in the top of the ladder. He stopped Keystone XL project showed himself to be environmentalist and joining the Paris climate accord which will impact millions of jobs but then orders military to starts stealing oil from Syria is the height of hypocrisy lol- .
 
Last edited:
Right, so ignore so many Govt's who have banned Soros evil NGO's in questions with so many references including the biggest from Reuters but sure, let's change the topic and say something bad abt india, coz you wanna argue just coz you wanna.
Let's see the list of countries that have a primary problem with Soros:
  • Russia (An authoritarianism regime)
  • Hungary (Moving towards an authoritarianism regime)
Recently, India has been cracking down upon Soros-funded NGOs.

And since India's democracy index is on a free-fall like Hungary, that means India is also on the verge of an authoritarianism regime.

So, let me ask you, are you in favour of an authoritarianism regime in India?
 
And very convenient of you to mention attack on Capitol building but completely ignore attacks by BLM rioters and looting, as encouraged and supported by the democrats.

Cool story bro
Racial injustice and a lost president encouraging a coup are same things. Cool story bro.

You're way too deep in crazytown for me. I'll be out with my popcorns. Keep ranting about '''the left'''.
 
Let's see the list of countries that have a primary problem with Soros:
  • Russia (An authoritarianism regime)
  • Hungary (Moving towards an authoritarianism regime)
Recently, India has been cracking down upon Soros-funded NGOs.

And since India's democracy index is on a free-fall like Hungary, that means India is also on the verge of an authoritarianism regime.

So, let me ask you, are you in favour of an authoritarianism regime in India?

Dude you have no idea what you're talking about, Soros is a known massive currency speculator that causes immense damage to economies, stop portraying him as some benevolent philantropist, the guy's a bankster puppet.


 
Dude you have no idea what you're talking about, Soros is a known massive currency speculator that causes immense damage to economies, stop portraying him as some benevolent philantropist, the guy's a bankster puppet.


I'm sure, no one here is trying to paint Soros as an angel.

But, if we're going to discredit the current work of a person just because of some weird things he/she had done in the past, then that's being extremely tunnel-visioned.

Let's see some of the things that Soros have promoted over the years:
  • Supported think tanks
  • NPOs supporting LGBTQ+
  • Free markets
  • Freedom of speech
  • Human rights
  • Women rights
  • More transparency
  • Rule of Law, etc.
Therefore, it's no wonder that only the authoritarianism regimes are having problems with Soros and no one else.

He has been a boogeyman for the hard right extremists, for a long time now. And that's why you see such conspiracy theories as well.
 
And that's why you see such conspiracy theories as well.

Those are not conspiracy theories.



His Open Society foundation is nothing but a front to subvert countries under the guise of being progressive.
 
Those are not conspiracy theories.



His Open Society foundation is nothing but a front to subvert countries under the guise of being progressive.
Like I explained, it all depends on what you want to believe and thereby allow that to fit your narrative.

I've already mentioned my reasons.

Have been down that rabbit hole too many times, so don't want put more thinking into this.
 
Personally I have been really impressed by how India eventually turned around and faught that effing virus head on ( instead of going under the pseudo security of blanket lock downs)
And in certain aspects India is indeed way ahead of many EU countries and specially UK.
Most of you guys probably don't know about certain shocking things happening in Europe..
In UK, the great NHS doesn't do a single PCR, every test has to be done in private labs...guess the cost...150 EUR!! Now it's possibly 130 EUR after lot of protests.
NHS will admit a covid patient and will only provide absolutely basic treatment... everything else...you pay from your pocket!!
 
Like I explained, it all depends on what you want to believe and thereby allow that to fit your narrative.

Applies to you as well, if you wish to believe that someone who's known to take advantage of political turmoil to bet against economies time and again to benefit his billionaire buddies has a good heart, I have nothing else to discuss with you.
 
Racial injustice and a lost president encouraging a coup are same things. Cool story bro.

You're way too deep in crazytown for me. I'll be out with my popcorns. Keep ranting about '''the left'''.

Election fraud with proof's and a witch hunt by democrat's just because They can't handle how much support Trump have and now have this impeachment witch hunt for what? All know democrats don't have the votes in the senate. But why still push it soooooooooo much? Oh right, just so he can't hold an office and can't compete in 2024. Cool story bro. I hope you do share those popcorn's with me, I love me some ACT II butter lovers.

Let's see the list of countries that have a primary problem with Soros:
  • Russia (An authoritarianism regime)
  • Hungary (Moving towards an authoritarianism regime)
Recently, India has been cracking down upon Soros-funded NGOs.

And since India's democracy index is on a free-fall like Hungary, that means India is also on the verge of an authoritarianism regime.

So, let me ask you, are you in favour of an authoritarianism regime in India?

I'm against authoritarianism regime (highlighting it so you understand what I stand for and not to ask me this BS again) but don't BS if you can't prove it and don't quote me stuff of a news publication which have a long history of having a bias. We all know under democrats how US have an habit to strongly control the narrative. Go and check with ex-R&AW chief. (Source:
)

Even Soros's funded NGO's have been cited in US by republicans. is US an authoritarian regime country right? Probably acc to u it is as long as republicans are in power. Lol, get out of my face with your BS.

Soros is a Hungarian born, his own Govt have cited the same for Soros, but nooooo, acc to you , he is an angel.. lol. Nice.

He has been a boogeyman for the hard right extremists, for a long time now. And that's why you see such conspiracy theories as well.
'
ROFLMAO, dude, did you just quote your own statement copied from BBC? Wow.. Just... I give up.

His Open Society foundation is nothing but a front to subvert countries under the guise of being progressive.

Exactly. These people love to see publications and quote them who have an extreme Left bias, but they ignore the extreme right publications lol. Atleast I call BS when seeing stuff which is too right (for ex Republic, I don't watch it, I have an open mind and watch both sides space)

Like I explained, it all depends on what you want to believe and thereby allow that to fit your narrative.

I've already mentioned my reasons.

Have been down that rabbit hole too many times, so don't want put more thinking into this.

You might wanna put a bit more thinking towards this as the BS you say about what you believe in to fit your narrative applies to you very accurately.

As far as i understand soros only sees money and wont give a flying **** about human rights and such. these are philosophical topics and there is no black and white. moreover every thing is grey.

These people think a person who runs a hedge funds care about Human rights lol. That's just hilarious.
 
selective bias... isn’t it true with you too?
Applies to you as well, if you wish to believe that someone who's known to take advantage of political turmoil to bet against economies time and again to benefit his billionaire buddies has a good heart, I have nothing else to discuss with you.
In case you guys have missed my confession in my earlier post, I'll quote it here again:

I've already mentioned my reasons.
I'm against authoritarianism regime (highlighting it so you understand what I stand for and not to ask me this BS again) but don't BS if you can't prove it and don't quote me stuff of a news publication which have a long history of having a bias. We all know under democrats how US have an habit to strongly control the narrative. Go and check with ex-R&AW chief. (Source:
)
Since you're pretty ignorant/naive about democracy index, I suggest you better read it.

Spend your time, understand it. Burn that midnight oil. My suggestion would be to go to Wikipedia and see the trends. Take a pen & paper with you.

Only then, we can have a meaningful conversation about this.
 
Last edited:
So they voted for a guy who appointed his family and bootlickers in government. LOL.

And very convenient of you to mention BLM protest but completely ignore attack on Capitol building, as encouraged by Donald Trump.

Cool story bro.
Capital riots is well known, just in my post prior to this I touched open it.



Don't forget this

And this during trump inauguration
 
No offense but I'd say foreigners are as clueless about Indian politics as much as Indians are clueless about the political affairs in other countries.
What you hear and see on the media is not indicative of actual things happening on the ground so you guys arguing about politics in the USA is like some rednecks in Alabama arguing about Indian politics, which you have to agree is a total waste of time.
Your entire arguments would be based on biased sources just like we have our own, they too have their own animal farms/echo chambers that people latch onto based on their political leanings.
None taken. Some foreigners are clueless sure I wouldn't put myself with them. As far as US politics I have been following it since 2009. Most of my posts in TE are on the tech side but if some of it are on on politics and they are mainly about US policies less so about domestic Indian policies, the only time I commented on Indian politics is when china/ pak vs india stuff happens, or when the jobless CAA protesters where causing traffic jam near SP road.

I know which are Bias which are just BS, there are so many hyperbole stuff on the Right wing conspiracy as there are on Left wing side. I know for a fact that the MSM lies and there bias. I know trump is no saint he lies too. I only care on his world policy and to some extent is domestic polices, how many woman he slept with or how rich he really his is of no concern. At the same time I do acknowledge stuff like his Trump university sham, made in China Trump endorsed products.
 
My suggestion would be to go to Wikipedia.

Only then, we can have a meaningful conversation about this.

Our meaningful conversation went right out the window when you spoke about wikipedia, just recently nytimes begged NY Supreme Court to Dismiss a Defamation Lawsuit admitted to one of their article Inaccuracies While Under Oath! Wikipedia itself have a quote for themselves: "Wikipedia is not a reliable source." https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Wikipedia_is_not_a_reliable_source . Wikipedia one founder have been very clear about his political bias and his other founder have been very clear about wikipedia being compromised already.


These leftiest's won't acknowledge any of this because acc to them, BLM was the most peaceful protest LOL. They say, SEEE THEY ARE EVEN NOMINATED FOR NOBEL, Oh well, guess what, so is Trump and so is Jared Kushner.
 
Our meaningful conversation went right out the window when you spoke about wikipedia, just recently nytimes begged NY Supreme Court to Dismiss a Defamation Lawsuit admitted to one of their article Inaccuracies While Under Oath! Wikipedia itself have a quote for themselves: "Wikipedia is not a reliable source." https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Wikipedia_is_not_a_reliable_source . Wikipedia one founder have been very clear about his political bias and his other founder have been very clear about wikipedia being compromised already.
You must be joking.

The Democracy Index report is churned out by the EIU (Economist Intelligence Unit) and not Wikipedia.

I mentioned Wikipedia because you'll get all the data, stats and past trends at one place, without having to scour the whole internet for the same.

This is like next-level prejudice.

Seems like I was right. You indeed have no idea what you're talking about. I'm out. Good luck and I'm out!
 
The Democracy Index report is churned out by the EIU (Economist Intelligence Unit) and not Wikipedia.

That's not saying much now is it, The Economist is nothing but a bankster owned globalist mouthpiece, one of the primary stakeholders being the Rothschild family.
Rothschilds being the primary backers of Cecil Rhodes who looted the erstwhile Zimbabwe+Zambia+South Africa (who also happened to believe in Imperialism and Anglo-Saxon supremacy btw) and funded the same people who led to the rise in Zionism and creation of Israel are going to tell people how their country ranks on the democratic index lol.
 
Back
Top