CAG report exonerates the govt of any scam. Bottom line!
Here's food for thought - Ruias have knowingly defaulted on their loans. How can anyone be sure that they actually have the money to pay off 54k crores debt? It can be simply that they are spouting BS and never intend to pay a dime and extend the IBC process. And they have almost achieved that with the recent ruling from NCLAT Ahmedabad.Don't worry mate. I am not someone who won't keep harping his own trumpet in front of facts and justifiable arguments.
I read some more articles and it seems that the Essar group didn't want to let go of their steel business. Even during IBC, they were saying that they are willing to pay off the entire debt of 54k crores. So, they did have the money, or get the money in time, and wanted to pay off the lenders and hold on to their business. That's why they even went to the length of forming NuMetal group. But, then the bone of contention is that they had to be jolted into doing that by the NCLT by initiating IBS proceedings. Until then, they were comfortable into being labeled as wilful defaulters and not fulfilling their payment responsibilities. I got this information from this article - https://www.newsclick.in/essar-group-fudging-insolvency-and-bankruptcy-code-process
Let me know if their findings and opinions are right or not.
But, I don't believe that crony capitalism is not existant in India. My dad used to work at IDBI Bank, including loan recovery dept. So I remember, how livid he used to be at his seniors for not doing the needful in time and letting NPAs turn bigger and bigger when they could have nipped those problems and their exposures in the bud. In fact, Mr. BK Batra, ex-MD of IDBI, who got charged in the Kingfisher case, used to be one of our neighbours and I remember my Dad using the choicest of expletives for him, long before the Kingfisher case.
As for whether Peri Maheshwar took down IIPM or not, you can read about it here - https://www.moneylife.in/article/ma...areers360-vanquishes-iipm-in-court/46125.html
The IBC law has come as a surprise to many wilful defaulters and they are trying everything to derail it by challenging every section of the law. Out of the original 12, many have similar issues - promoters being comfortable as defaulters and then suddenly facing a challenge from a new law and now trying to derail the process as much as they can. This is an expected side effect of a new law.
I am confused, which question do you mean?I follow these developments from a geopolitics perspective. The idea was Russia is inviting India to diversify against China. You'd think the rate would be attractive and not high. So your question still stands.
The bolded bitI am confused, which question do you mean?
If you are talking about ONGC then it is a public company which means it is their fiduciary duty to explain their thought process to their shareholders in annual reports/investor calls. Anyone can look that up and find out what was the real output vs price etc information.
One, acquisition valuations is not hard science as what the article tries to show off. We don't know why govt oil companies bought Roseneft's share for high price. It could be that they believed that utility value of those mines were worth more even with decreasing outputs. Or that these companies were securing themselves against an uncertain oil future - India's is heavily dependent on Iran for oil. No body knows. Without a substantive proof, this is simply guesswork. And I wish people, especially who are supposed to be "journalist" try to add this much subtly to their "analysis".
that corrupted law has recovered loads of bad loan and now latest is essar ruia enterprise who paid back their loan.
guess it’s hurting people who had to pay back the loan.
The Supreme Court Friday expressed unhappiness over some lawyers filing defective petitions and seeking wide publicity in the media, while referring to review pleas challenging its verdict in the Rafale case.
Ranjan Gogoi said lawyers file petitions in the apex court registry and instead of removing the defects of the pleas, they go to media for wide publicity.
“The other side is not so innocent…The petitioners go to media and claim wide publicity,” the bench of Chief Justice Gogoi and Justice Sanjiv Khanna said while referring to defective review petitions filed challenging its verdict in the Rafale case.
The apex court’s observation came when it was hearing lawyers mentioning cases for urgent listing and hearing.
Here's a thought experiment for you. Let's say you have a car which you want to sell and buy a new one. Now while you really want to buy the new car there is no set date. And you have someone who needs a car, specifically a 2nd hand model. Because you need to buy a new car, will you make the car price attractive in any way? The answer is No, you will try to extract as much value and even above market, if possible.The bolded bit
Why was the price high if Russia wants to diversify away from China. I don't know. You'd think it would be attractive in some way ?