Do you know how many mice where there when Windows 1.0 released? Practically none and way lesser than the number of touchscreen devices today. Your comments remind me of what people said in 1985 regarding mice. In fact, let me quote what some experts predicted in 1985:
- “Mice are nice ideas, but of dubious value for business users†(George Vinall, PC Week, April 24, 1984)
- “There is no evidence that people want to use these things.†(John C. Dvorak, San Francisco Examiner, February 19, 1984)
- “I was having lots of fun, but in the back of my corporate mind, I couldn't help but think about productivity.†(George Vinall, PC Week, April 24, 1984)
- “Does the mouse make the computer more accessible, more friendly, to certain target audiences such as executives? The answer is no.†(Computerworld, October 31, 1983)
- “There is no possibility that this device will feel more comfortable to the executive than the keyboard. Because of its ‘rollability,’ the mouse has the aura of a gimmick…†(Computerworld, October 31, 1983)
- “The mouse and its friends are merely diversions in this process. What sounds revolutionary does not necessarily help anyone with anything, and therein lies the true test of commercial longevity.†(David A. Kay, Datamation, October 1983)
I don't need to mention that Windows 95 was ridiculed for the "childish" Start menu, and XP was slammed on launch, etc. It's about vision, and looking to the future. Time and time again people have been left behind by clinging on to the past.
Besides, you are also conveniently ignoring that the Desktop is not just there but vastly improved over 7 - much more than 7 was improved over Vista. You can easily ignore Metro if you so wish, the only difference will be that instead of Start Menu you have a new Start Screen which is by the way much better in most ways and much more configurable. Like I said earlier in this thread, you can pin not just apps but also settings, folders, etc. The Search is way better. It is so good that I have stopped using Explorer! Looking back I feel like an idiot for using that goofy pop up menu to launch programs, the Start menu is a relic which should be condemned to the past.
Even if you have a touchscreen, the point of Windows 8 is not that you just drop everything and suddenly use only touch. It's about giving user the choice for using the best tool for the job, something Windows has always excelled at. The perfect example is Microsoft Surface, which is the signature device for Windows 8, notice how it went into great lengths to integrate not just touch but also keyboard and touchpad. (with option for a mouse using the USB port). Touch is great for a lot of things, but horrible for typing, which is why you need a keyboard. Mice are clumsy to use for most things but for precision use it is better than touch, which is why you use mice. But it doesn't end there, Windows 8 has awesome handwriting recognition, and Kinect for Windows is bringing in gesture driven Minority Report style interfacing.
You have to use Windows 8 on a touchscreen to believe it. I defy you to use it and not be delighted by it. And then later instinctively try to touch non-touchscreen monitors and look foolish for it.
I could go on and on, but my only advice is - Windows 8 is the future of computing. Embrace it or you will be left behind.
Finally, Windows 8 is a bold new step forward into the future. It is a version 1 product and in my opinion far more mature than where OS X 10.1, iOS (then iPhone OS) 1 and Android 1.0 were at launch. It will only get better, and in the short term it will get better very significantly very fast.