All newbie/starter entry level DSLR information
- Thread starter Havok
- Start date
- Status
Aces170
Forerunner
I think its for 51k with the 18-105 VR lens, which gives you a higher focal length then the kit lens (the 18-105mm VR lens itself cost 18-20k). And mate you simply cannot compare the D90 with the D3xxx series of Nikon, the D90 sensor is leagues ahead, it has a penta-prsim viewfinder, once you start taking lot of snaps you will understand the importance of a bigger, and brighter viewfinder. Oh and Af compatibility with all Nikon lenses..
When I had bought my 1000D for 25k, the D90 was 60k. If at that point of time, I had known the difference I would have anyhow begged/borrowed for a D90
Maybe on the hind-sight a cheaper body will allow me to get used to the basics, and evaluate what sort of photography do I prefer..
gaganjain
Explorer
It is time for u too upgrade.....
Aces170 said:I think its for 51k with the 18-105 VR lens, which gives you a higher focal length then the kit lens (the 18-105mm VR lens itself cost 18-20k). And mate you simply cannot compare the D90 with the D3xxx series of Nikon, the D90 sensor is leagues ahead, it has a penta-prsim viewfinder, once you start taking lot of snaps you will understand the importance of a bigger, and brighter viewfinder. Oh and Af compatibility with all Nikon lenses..
When I had bought my 1000D for 25k, the D90 was 60k. If at that point of time, I had known the difference I would have anyhow begged/borrowed for a D90
Aces170
Forerunner
^^ Nope, I do not think I am being limited by the body right now, have a couple of lenses I need to save up for first (Tamron 70-200 f2.8, Tokina 11-16 f2.8, Canon 100mm f2.8 non IS in the order). And if after all this if I have money left maybe an upgrade to a Canon 7D replacement 
Konquerror
Forerunner
You love fast lenses...don't youAces170 said:^^ Nope, I do not think I am being limited by the body right now, have a couple of lenses I need to save up for first (Tamron 70-200 f2.8, Tokina 11-16 f2.8, Canon 100mm f2.8 non IS in the order). And if after all this if I have money left maybe an upgrade to a Canon 7D replacement
. I also love fast primes...thinking of upgrading to Canon 50mm f/1.4 USM
Aces170
Forerunner
I love fast lenses, have decided no compromises there, am missing the longer focal length atm. The 50mm f1.4mm is the second most sharpest lens I have seen (Canon 100mm L glass being the sharpest I have come across), the 50mm f1.4 is worth every penny, it is razor sharp at f1.8, the bokeh is deliciously creamy, and the USM motor is fast and accurate in low light..
Pranav, you should come to the MWS shoots, you will get to experience all these lenses and bodies in live action
Konquerror
Forerunner
Aces170 said:I love fast lenses, have decided no compromises there, am missing the longer focal length atm. The 50mm f1.4mm is the second most sharpest lens I have seen (Canon 100mm L glass being the sharpest I have come across), the 50mm f1.4 is worth every penny, it is razor sharp at f1.8, the bokeh is deliciously creamy, and the USM motor is fast and accurate in low light..
Pranav, you should come to the MWS shoots, you will get to experience all these lenses and bodies in live action
Wow...I was a little hesitant about this lens...but I have made my mind for this lens...I wanted to join MWS shoot this weekend but I couldn't wake up early in morning...Vasai is really far from Navi Mumbai...
. Will join soon...I would love to see those lenses in action 
Brendon
Galvanizer
Lazy bugger !!!Konquerror said:Wow...I was a little hesitant about this lens...but I have made my mind for this lens...I wanted to join MWS shoot this weekend but I couldn't wake up early in morning...Vasai is really far from Navi Mumbai...
Faheem was trying to come for that shoot. He too stays at Navi Mumbai. But he was unable to find a rickshaw for 30 minutes so he decided to scrap the plan.
Do try and make it next Sundays shoot. You can drag Faheem with you.
Btw I too tried the 50mm f1.4 and found it noticeably better than the f1.8 version both in build quality and IQ.
Brendon
Galvanizer
Lens reversal will give you the maximum magnification but the worst working distance. Best for dead insects or flowers.
ETs are an expensive option if you use an AF lens.
Close up lenses are the cheapest option but will give you the least magnification unless you stack a lot of diopters and reduce IQ.
For options 1 & 2 a MF lens with an aperture ring is the best bet. You can use manual ETs with a MF lens and save some cash.
ETs are an expensive option if you use an AF lens.
Close up lenses are the cheapest option but will give you the least magnification unless you stack a lot of diopters and reduce IQ.
For options 1 & 2 a MF lens with an aperture ring is the best bet. You can use manual ETs with a MF lens and save some cash.
@foto gurus...
I need few info mates.
What are these len reversal, Lens extension bracket, and such. what are their uses?
And also during my last shooting out(I seldom click :S). I had few issues. please help this fool
Location : Zoo, Lens : 18 - 55
1. I use AF. and try to get animals in cage. obviously the cage's grill gets focused :S.
If i use MF i cant get the sharpness reqd. what to do?
2. Using a prime in above situations helpful?...
3. I use Aperture mode most times.. coz i like the blurry bg. So.. i think i was using low Av values for a distant object.
but all the pic was dark .. S...
4. There are times when the cages insides are dark.. how to get pics.. i tried pumping the ISO and putting the Av to a medium values.
no use. :S.
Please help folks.
I need few info mates.
What are these len reversal, Lens extension bracket, and such. what are their uses?
And also during my last shooting out(I seldom click :S). I had few issues. please help this fool
Location : Zoo, Lens : 18 - 55
1. I use AF. and try to get animals in cage. obviously the cage's grill gets focused :S.
If i use MF i cant get the sharpness reqd. what to do?
2. Using a prime in above situations helpful?...
3. I use Aperture mode most times.. coz i like the blurry bg. So.. i think i was using low Av values for a distant object.
but all the pic was dark .. S...
4. There are times when the cages insides are dark.. how to get pics.. i tried pumping the ISO and putting the Av to a medium values.
no use. :S.
Please help folks.
thanks brendon for replying.
further, i intend to buy canon 50 mm f1.8.i am not averse to manual focussing but as this does not have aperture ring (point me if i am wrong),does it mean that lens reversal and use of cheaper et's (costing few hundred bucks) is ruled out with it ?
and for close up lenses,how much close can one go with combination of +1,+2&+4 dioptres?
further, i intend to buy canon 50 mm f1.8.i am not averse to manual focussing but as this does not have aperture ring (point me if i am wrong),does it mean that lens reversal and use of cheaper et's (costing few hundred bucks) is ruled out with it ?
and for close up lenses,how much close can one go with combination of +1,+2&+4 dioptres?
Aces170
Forerunner
1. Manually select the AF pointm-jeri said:
2. Not really, why do you think so?
3. A lower AV (wider aperture) will capture more light, so you are doing right there. Increase the ISO and in manual mode lower the shutter speed.
4. No real solution here, apart from using flash and scaring off the animal.
--- Updated Post - Automerged ---
Live view FTW, MF is way easier in liveview...
Brendon
Galvanizer
If you have a 50mm lens then I suggest magnification diopters only as ETs and reverse rings wont work for the lack of an aperture control.alex001 said:
However do note that you wont be able to get as much magnification as a ET or reverse ring method but you will get AF which is pretty nice. Also do note that with diopter rings the focus range is very limited.
- Status