Graphic Cards Crysis Benchmark Thread

[gamepagol]

@ madnav - how cud u play when Benchmark is running?????? :bleh: :bleh:

if u r in vista try to run benchmark tool with administrative privilege and in Add Runs settings just enter the number of Demo Loops ...it will close automatically after that much runs and will give u the results

 

[Shripad]

Guys, I am sure he is talking about the in game benchmark bat file. that will keep looping unless you bring down the console and type "quit". then only it will quit and display avg FPS in command window.

With crysis benchmark tool, same benchmark is run but tool automatically quits the benchmark after specified no of runs.

Thats what madnav is experiencing. He is running benchmark by using bat file.

M8 download the Crysis benchmark tool and use that. much easier.

 

[madnav]

i have CrysisBenchmarkTool1.05 build5767

crap...i dnt have patch installed.:ashamed:
will dload n install 2moro.

 

[madnav]

@ madnav - how cud u play when Benchmark is running?????? :bleh: :bleh:

if u r in vista try to run benchmark tool with administrative privilege and in Add Runs settings just enter the number of Demo Loops ...it will close automatically after that much runs and will give u the results

the game start after i run benchmark...it waits for my response..else it doesnt go further...just like wen u play the game..
im tired of playin da game half da way twice now
will patch n benchmark :ashamed:

 

[SidhuScorpion]

All Crysis lovers, download Crysis gameplay video -

4870X2, E8400 @ 4G

1680x1050

Very High

4x AA

Part 1

Part 2

Observe any microslutter by repeatedly watching, I can catch. Game looks gorgeous, Very High 4x AA.

Videos r made by mascaras, XS member.

 

[gamepagol]

@madnav thats not fair.... benchmark shouldn't allow u to play at all... something is wrong...

which OS u r running? do u have dual booting? if yes u have to set proper path of crysis in that benchmark tool

 

[madnav]

yup dude i have set correct path n all..

i guess its some prob wid da patch..

i'll patch it 2moro n will try again..

 

[SidhuScorpion]

E6850 @ 3.6GHz, P35, eVGA G92 GTS 512 @ 800-1998-2400MHz , 2GB DDR2 @ 900MHz 4-4-4-15, Seagate 7200.11 500GB, XP x86 SP3, Forceware 177.98

DX9 High

Run #1- 1280x1024 AA=No AA ~ Last Average FPS: 54.685

Run #2- 1680x1050 AA=No AA, ~ Last Average FPS: 41.9



E6850 @ 3.6GHz, P35, MSI G92 GTS 512 @ 763-1944-2070MHz , 2GB DDR2 @ 900MHz 4-4-4-15, Seagate 7200.11 500GB, Vista x86 SP1, Forceware 177.83

DX10 Very High

Run #1- 1280x1024 AA=No AA ~ Last Average FPS: 30

Run #2- 1680x1050 AA=No AA ~ Last Average FPS: 21

 

[gamervivek]

^^ one review had that 4870x2 had only a penalty of 3fps at going from high to 4xAA very high in vista:O .looks like finally dx10 is showing its muscle.

 

[SidhuScorpion]

Mistake corrected, forgot to select DX10 button :rofl:

yea 4X AA is free in 4870X2

^^ one review had that 4870x2 had only a penalty of 3fps at going from high to 4xAA very high in vista:O .looks like finally dx10 is showing its muscle.

 

[gamervivek]

Mistake corrected, forgot to select DX10 button :rofl:

yea 4X AA is free in 4870X2

hahaha,so whats it then?
better drivers in vista or is the very high setting for dx9 just the normal high of xp?

 

[SidhuScorpion]

Dunno buddy, see Udits Dx9 High vs Dx10 High, both in Vista, 6FPS differance. :S , 15FPS differance in ma GPU, Dx9 Very High vs Dx10 Very High.

hahaha,so whats it then?

better drivers in vista or is the very high setting for dx9 just the normal high of xp?

 

[i_max2k2]

^^ one review had that 4870x2 had only a penalty of 3fps at going from high to 4xAA very high in vista:O .looks like finally dx10 is showing its muscle.

This is on SLI! My 2cents

 

[gamepagol]

All Very High Vista x64 SP1

Run #1- DX10 1280x1024 AA=No AA, Quality: High ~ Last Average FPS: 31.88
Run #2- DX10 1680x1050 AA=No AA, Quality: High ~ Last Average FPS: 24.23

 

[gamepagol]

This is on SLI! My 2cents

8x results better than 4x .... hyeah: ..

 

[SidhuScorpion]

OC it more na, I know U still have lots of headroom left, U can beat 4870 by huge margin :rofl: :clap:

All Very High Vista x64 SP1

Run #1- DX10 1280x1024 AA=No AA, Quality: High ~ Last Average FPS: 31.88

Run #2- DX10 1680x1050 AA=No AA, Quality: High ~ Last Average FPS: 24.23

 

[Shripad]

OC it more na, I know U still have lots of headroom left, U can beat 4870 by huge margin :rofl: :clap:

galloping 3FPS is a huge thing in Crysis for GTS, so to go from 31 to 34+ will be very hard for him

His shaders will crap out before his clock and memory, and shaders count the most here. So I would really like to see stock condition GTS overtake 4870

It will take water + lot more clock on CPU and possibly a vmod on GPU to do this

 

[Jasku]

LOL, I need to have the game to be able to use the bechmark tool, coz its less than a mb!...sad

 

[SidhuScorpion]

Anish updated Dx9 scores, #68.

 

[Rockfella]

I am wondering how come you got 35 in 1024 res while i got 34.

See my specs in siggy.

e2140@3.1GHz 3870@865/1126 xp32

dx9 high,catalyst 8.5

1280x1024 40.35fps



1680x1050 31.23fps

[/quote]