So, your comments almost boils down to what I am thinking.
"The government is not men. They are not deciding on equality on the basis of "hey, we're on top, lets give them some equality too". It is done according to the constitution." - So, hope women never needed to worry about patriarchy, the constitution was working fine from the beginning and feminism is just hive mindedness ? Feminism is an ideology that explains away the moral failings of women as the fault of a patriarchal “systemâ€, but holds men responsible for their actions. And most important, it is an ideology that shortchanges children by privileging the rights and importance to children of mothers over fathers.
"Also, is the usage of "working hard" somehow implying women don't?" - So, what you found out after reading article in the link and areas where women wants reservations, in general.
"Mentally capable? On what basis did you say that? Cherry picking just one capability? Both have
their own advantages." - After reading the article, found why men generally excel in most topics. They are biologically better built for their role and in general used their inborn trait better than women and gets to be successful to be dominant in society.
"Yeah, because the worth of a woman is decided by whether men are ready to marry her." -
As a result of feminists’ promotion of career equity with men and unrestrained sexual experimentation over early and faithful commitment, women are having fewer children later, and many are having none. Consequently, birthrates are down in all western countries, in many below the replacement levels. Canada’s current fertility rate is 1.54 per woman, behind one-child China’s 1.7.
Sadly, many women realize they want to have children, but too late. They were not warned by their Women’s Studies teachers or by feminist commentators that fertility peaks by age 25, or that late pregnancies carry elevated risks, or that induced abortions pose a risk of pre-term delivery in future pregnancies.
All of these realities are directly traceable to feminist doctrine.
Feminists’ original goal may not have been the intention to preside over the actual demographic decline of western civilization. Their goal was to empower women. But as the old saying goes, when you are up to your neck in alligators, it’s difficult to remember that your original intention was to drain the swamp.
You only need few quotes from Chanakya to guess why west want to export this social exploit on to youngistan India.
Guess what, for civilizations to sustain, both the genders need to do their biological roles, which is disrupted by these irresponsible movement.
"In a society where women are suppressed, this character isn't seen much at all, and only misogyny is largely present."
"The good thing about equality is that some women can hate men (misandry), just like some men hate women (misogyny). In a society where women are suppressed, this character isn't seen much at all, and only misogyny is largely present.",
- So, you can say that in a society powerful humans in general abuse power, irrespective of gender. Isn't things expected to be better when women are in control according to feminists, aren't all problems happening when men are in control ? How feminist Sweden ascribed to letting dogs snip humans ? Isn't that so Nazi ? Why in this 21st century feminist Sweden is in this level.
Otherwise, what is the point in all these women appeasement, creating more abuse and inbalance in society through legally abusive means (against only one gender - men) so that each appeasing political party can get gender based votes ?
The official state report in Denmark says that every woman born is a liability by 2,4m dkr (boys do the paying) Page 382 here:
http://www.dreammodel.dk/pdf/R2004_01.pdf
I never wanted to be a white knight, my view in general matches points here:
http://www.freewebs.com/feminism-evaluated/
... But I m glad on SC's decision... Better luck next time...
