Mephistopheles
Discoverer
See, this system is flawed that way. If I want to rep the same person genuinely again I can't. I'm forced to rep some 10-12 other people.DarkAngel said:I have explained this a couple of times before and still it comes up.
So here goes.
i) You can rep only 'n' no of times in a particular time period.
ii) Once you rep a person you cant rep him back unless you rep 10-12 person.
ii) Most importantly the no. of points you can rep another person with is only ~1%-2% of the points you have.
For eg., if someone has '0' points then if you rep someone else they will get only '0' points. If you have ~50 points then only the person you rep will get '1' point. So work out yourselves how long it would take to take out a coup like that.
In the same way a gang of 10 can also like each and every post among their own gang and the like bar can increase by 100's in a day which is impossible in the rep system
What If I see a very good an informative article/post from the person I had recently repped, again? And there are no other members who have done anything to deserve a rep in that time period?
With likes, there is no such problem and the main objective of reps (i.e. to motivate or to acknowledge) is also met.
So what else does the rep system have to offer?
madnav said:imagine old reputable members going away for a while due to personal problems and returning back to realize that no one acknowledges their past. The people who knew the member would do but for the rest of the member..he is just another noob know joined a few years ago and never cared to earn any reputation...kind of a leech he looks like when he posts a query .. yes..i paint quite a picture
What if there was no rep system at all?
Err..what? what exposure? :SCA50 said:Simple, why are the members creating these threads, because the like system is not giving them enough exposure, so i have suggested the like-meter, that will do the work ie required exposure for the members to feed on
M@crosoft said:It's quite obvious that liking a post is far easier than repping it...so why can't these dots depend upon likes rather than reps?
Like I said, having something like this public has its disadvantages. Having a like meter instead of reps would be counter productive as likes can be given by anybody on anything, and the probability of a member having high no. of likes giving comparatively lesser efficient solutions/posts will rise.
If we are to have something public, then between the two reps is what it should be. Although I feel the rep system should be done away with or they could be non-static.
What's wrong with acknowledging someone with likes?thetoxicmind said:REPS on the other hand, are useful when you wish to acknowledge someone's hard work, perhaps in the form of guides and other useful resources for the benefit of all members..