V VOiLA Contributor Jul 31, 2009 #21 gr8 purchase bro. congrats. waiting for pics.. and which is better ? jbl or jvc ? thanks
A -Anish- Forerunner Aug 1, 2009 #22 JVC is better by leaps and bounds.. JBLs are really good for people looking for portability not that the SQ is bad, its really good if someone has not heard the JVC before
JVC is better by leaps and bounds.. JBLs are really good for people looking for portability not that the SQ is bad, its really good if someone has not heard the JVC before
V Vandal Forerunner Aug 12, 2009 #23 Very nice, those cans are super VFM. Now throw caution to the wind and buy the GS1000
A -Anish- Forerunner Aug 12, 2009 #25 I was supposed to buy the Grado SR60, but then in some reviews it mentioned that the bass is not so deep. Is that true ? Reactions: 1 person
I was supposed to buy the Grado SR60, but then in some reviews it mentioned that the bass is not so deep. Is that true ?
Brendon Galvanizer Aug 13, 2009 #27 |Anish| said: I was supposed to buy the Grado SR60, but then in some reviews it mentioned that the bass is not so deep. Is that true ? Click to expand... Yup ! And they are darn uncomfortable to boot. Generally they are not very nice headphones.
|Anish| said: I was supposed to buy the Grado SR60, but then in some reviews it mentioned that the bass is not so deep. Is that true ? Click to expand... Yup ! And they are darn uncomfortable to boot. Generally they are not very nice headphones.
Lord Nemesis Overlord Luminary Aug 23, 2009 #28 Hey how does the JVC HA-RX900 fare for gaming? Does any one know how it compares to an Audio Technica AD700 with respect to gaming?
Hey how does the JVC HA-RX900 fare for gaming? Does any one know how it compares to an Audio Technica AD700 with respect to gaming?
A -Anish- Forerunner Aug 23, 2009 #29 Have played using JVC900, pretty much satisfied with them. Cant compare as I havent heard AD700 while gaming. There are some comments regarding the same @ Head-fi. JVC HA-RX900 vs. AT AD700 - Head-Fi: Covering Headphones, Earphones and Portable Audio
Have played using JVC900, pretty much satisfied with them. Cant compare as I havent heard AD700 while gaming. There are some comments regarding the same @ Head-fi. JVC HA-RX900 vs. AT AD700 - Head-Fi: Covering Headphones, Earphones and Portable Audio
sumchamp Forerunner Aug 23, 2009 #30 ^ Congo anish for purchase of these awesome stuffs :hap2: Now I am waiting for its younger bro JVC RX700, which I ordered thru KMD. Enjoy the cans.
^ Congo anish for purchase of these awesome stuffs :hap2: Now I am waiting for its younger bro JVC RX700, which I ordered thru KMD. Enjoy the cans.
A -Anish- Forerunner Aug 23, 2009 #31 IMO, RX700 are better for gaming as per many reviews compared to RX900. No idea about AD700. Thank you sumchamp
IMO, RX700 are better for gaming as per many reviews compared to RX900. No idea about AD700. Thank you sumchamp
Lord Nemesis Overlord Luminary Aug 25, 2009 #32 how's the bass response of the rx900. Are they bass heavy.
A -Anish- Forerunner Aug 25, 2009 #33 I am no audiophile, but yes I wanted something that is capable of deep bass and the RX900 has successfully achieved that.
I am no audiophile, but yes I wanted something that is capable of deep bass and the RX900 has successfully achieved that.