Hades.
Galvanizer
Sandybridge architecture doesn't bring any great clock per clock improvement...sandy bridge is just 2 to 3% faster than current nehalem and lynnfield based processor so waiting for sandy bridge processor wud b a waste of time...DarkAngel said:Since it has a clock advantage 3.1Ghz/3.4Ghz, it should perform as good as a i-5 760 OCed to ~3.5-3.5GHz on multi threaded apps and i-5 760 OCed to ~3.8Ghz in single threaded apps assuming a performance boost of ~15-20% clock per clock due to architectural advantage.
but yeah 2500K wud b around 15 to 20% faster than i5 760 coz it has 3.3 ghz speed
So i think AMD can catch up sandy bridge by its bulldozer core this time coz sandy bridge processors doesnt have any architectural improvement...
Check out this review: Sandybridge Vs. Lynnfield
SandyBridge Core i7 2600K review