A Anish Inactive Forerunner Jul 6, 2006 #61 ^^ Doubt D9's but must be cheap That's a superb score KITT, that RAM seems to be holding off well...
K K.I.T.T. Inactive Contributor Jul 6, 2006 #62 Don't jump to conclusions...it is definitely D9, I assure you. And not particularly cheap either. £142 a set. Team Group's DDR2 Power: 667mhz 1g dual channel kit CL-3-4-4-8 - XtremeSystems Forums
Don't jump to conclusions...it is definitely D9, I assure you. And not particularly cheap either. £142 a set. Team Group's DDR2 Power: 667mhz 1g dual channel kit CL-3-4-4-8 - XtremeSystems Forums
H Harshal Inactive Forerunner Jul 7, 2006 #63 Yes it is finally happening! Conroe @ TE... MODs please keep an eye on this one^^^... You may have to keep updating the First POST @KITT, Congrats! Those are really good RAM there... BTW, TEAM-GROUP AFAIK uses Micron chips on Xtreem DDR2.
Yes it is finally happening! Conroe @ TE... MODs please keep an eye on this one^^^... You may have to keep updating the First POST @KITT, Congrats! Those are really good RAM there... BTW, TEAM-GROUP AFAIK uses Micron chips on Xtreem DDR2.
N Nikhil Inactive Forerunner Jul 7, 2006 #65 Bloody AWESOME!!! Now post some SuperPi times!!! And to post only screenies of pure overclocks, please do post in the POST YOUR OVERCLOCKS THREAD!!
Bloody AWESOME!!! Now post some SuperPi times!!! And to post only screenies of pure overclocks, please do post in the POST YOUR OVERCLOCKS THREAD!!
K K.I.T.T. Inactive Contributor Jul 10, 2006 #66 18.985s - K.I.T.T - Intel E6300ES @ 2877 MHz - Stock cooler - 2 x 1 GB Team Xtreem PC2 5300
V Vandal Inactive Forerunner Jul 10, 2006 #67 K.I.T.T. said: 18.985s - K.I.T.T - Intel E6300ES @ 2877 MHz - Stock cooler - 2 x 1 GB Team Xtreem PC2 5300 Click to expand... awesome, simply freaking goddamn awesome....jeez 18.anything is amazing...keep going...
K.I.T.T. said: 18.985s - K.I.T.T - Intel E6300ES @ 2877 MHz - Stock cooler - 2 x 1 GB Team Xtreem PC2 5300 Click to expand... awesome, simply freaking goddamn awesome....jeez 18.anything is amazing...keep going...
K K.I.T.T. Inactive Contributor Jul 10, 2006 #68 Cheers vandal...Unfortunately, I can't keep going Reached the limit of my mobo...The chip has ATLEAST another GHz to give...low muti and not enough FSB suck Currently the world record for the E6300. That's competing with guys faster than me: HWbot.org - Processor Info.
Cheers vandal...Unfortunately, I can't keep going Reached the limit of my mobo...The chip has ATLEAST another GHz to give...low muti and not enough FSB suck Currently the world record for the E6300. That's competing with guys faster than me: HWbot.org - Processor Info.
V Vandal Inactive Forerunner Jul 10, 2006 #70 OT kitt.. another thing rocks... the lady in your siggy!!! Cheers to ya too mayte.... yeah FSB bnecks = irritation unparalled..
OT kitt.. another thing rocks... the lady in your siggy!!! Cheers to ya too mayte.... yeah FSB bnecks = irritation unparalled..
A Aditya Inactive Forerunner Aug 4, 2006 #72 13.890 Seconds - Aditya - Intel X6800ES[Conroe] @ 3739 MHz - Stock cooler - 2 x 1 GB GSkill DDR2-800 2GBHZ
13.890 Seconds - Aditya - Intel X6800ES[Conroe] @ 3739 MHz - Stock cooler - 2 x 1 GB GSkill DDR2-800 2GBHZ
T TheMask Inactive Forerunner Aug 4, 2006 #73 Aditya said: 13.890 Seconds - Aditya - Intel X6800ES[Conroe] @ 3739 MHz - Stock cooler - 2 x 1 GB GSkill DDR2-800 2GBHZ Click to expand... OMG!!! :O dats a new WR!?!!??
Aditya said: 13.890 Seconds - Aditya - Intel X6800ES[Conroe] @ 3739 MHz - Stock cooler - 2 x 1 GB GSkill DDR2-800 2GBHZ Click to expand... OMG!!! :O dats a new WR!?!!??
A Aditya Inactive Forerunner Aug 4, 2006 #74 Lol.. I wish... Coolaler holds it @ 9.000s ... Dont expect it to be broken soon . Unless he himself breaks it .
Lol.. I wish... Coolaler holds it @ 9.000s ... Dont expect it to be broken soon . Unless he himself breaks it .
Darklord Inactive Galvanizer Aug 4, 2006 #75 So true...but those guys have a unfair advantage....lol Anywas good score there Goldie boy..
N Nikhil Inactive Forerunner Aug 4, 2006 #76 Nice Score there Adi !!! If only you could have run your RAM faster, it would have been lower
Darklord Inactive Galvanizer Aug 4, 2006 #77 ^^ If you are trying to pin it on the RAM,then you better back off, 2GBHZ is kickass stuff,IF you feed volts
^^ If you are trying to pin it on the RAM,then you better back off, 2GBHZ is kickass stuff,IF you feed volts
N Nikhil Inactive Forerunner Aug 4, 2006 #78 lol.....not blaming the RAM.... Just said that if Adi had run it at at least 800 mhz instead of 666, the score would have been better..... Do you agree or not ?
lol.....not blaming the RAM.... Just said that if Adi had run it at at least 800 mhz instead of 666, the score would have been better..... Do you agree or not ?
S Sandy Inactive Discoverer Aug 4, 2006 #79 :O OMG :O awesome score there.. Install the water cooling kit and lets see the magic it does
Darklord Inactive Galvanizer Aug 4, 2006 #80 ^^ Oh that way...yeah i agree nikhil... @ Sandy, he doesnt have the boards anymore unfortunately.ANd the idiot wasted one valuable day wanderin around with his gal...moron.
^^ Oh that way...yeah i agree nikhil... @ Sandy, he doesnt have the boards anymore unfortunately.ANd the idiot wasted one valuable day wanderin around with his gal...moron.