desiibond
Skilled
1 & 2. The CPU+dedicated GPU combination works better than most competing phone's 1GHz CPU (few exceptions like Desire HD, SGS). The lag that I noticed is more due to old OS than hardware. You should really see how well it's hardware does when you do multimedia operations like using coverflow, opening and editing videos, forwarding videos etc. It's just damn fast.jaganm said:I think Nokia has taken a short sighted approach and crippled it in a number of ways
1. Processor : A 680 MHz processor is definitely not good enough for a flagship phone in 2010. Atleast, if it was based on the A8 architecture (like what was used in the N900), it would have been acceptable.
2. RAM: 256 MB of RAM? Come on, that is what the budget phones have now. They should have gone for 512 MB atleast
3. Screen: the world is moving to WVGA and retina display, why stick to nHD resolution?
The fact is that these specs will not affect you right now. But in a year's time, the phone will be totally out of date. Nokia themselves will stop issuing updates to the firmware as they switch their focus to Symbian^4 and Meego. So, why should a discerning user go for this phone?
3. nHD? 360 x 640 is the standard resolution for 3.5" displays and N8 uses AMOLED. The display is just gorgeous and matches the competition. Watchin one 720p video on it and you will understand. And btw, retina shit is just a marketing gimmick and it does not do that much better when compared to AMOLED, especially when playing games or watching videos. The clarity and color richness and contrasts on AMOLED displays is lot lot better than that on retina shit.
There is only one thing that cripples N8 and that is S^3. Everything else is just awesome. I would love to use Maemo on this phone instead of S^3.
PS: I am not terming N8 as the best phone out there but there are some areas for which you need to give due credit to Nokia.