Post your overclocks !
- Thread starter bottle
- Start date
Blade_Runner
Forerunner
Parting shot for my 146 as well.........
Stress tested for 2:50 and few runs of super pi 1m.
Stress tested for 2:50 and few runs of super pi 1m.
Blade_Runner
Forerunner
1st 1: err maybeNikhil said:why parting shot?? Upgrading to X2 ehhh
And isnt 2.6 Ghz kinda low for Optys :S :S ??
2nd: yea can easily do 2.8, especially this particular stepping fpaw 0546 but after a full afternoon of tweaking i left it at this..........
Systemic Anamoly
Contributor
my 165 Oced
Credits: Blady thanks buddy
Mobo used: ASUS A8NE
Cooling System: Stock Heatsink of 165 :lol:
Blade_Runner
Forerunner
Yea thats prime stable. and the high temperature might be because of dried up thermal paste.....Nikhil said:Nice oc there Systemic !! For a Dual Core, 2.6 Ghz is amazing !! You have an FX 55
And that temp of 47 deg C is at idle I presume .......
And is it Prime 95 Stable ??
Systemic Anamoly
Contributor
yeah 47-48 at idle and max goes till 55 (checked it while playing CSS)
Mohit
Explorer
My experience with A8N-E
Assembled my rig yesterday
AMD 3000+
512 X 2 UCCC
A8N-E
and here are some initial results,
Prime + memtest stable ... idling at 40 ish and loaded at 49-50 C.
Vcore : 1.475V
Vdimm : 2.65V
Note that its running at 1T ... A8N-E and 1T ...
hyeah:
btw what would be a better oc among the following :
260 X 9 1:1 at 3-4-4-8 IT
or
270-275 X 9 using ram at 333mhz at 3-4-4-8 IT
any suggestions are welcome.
Assembled my rig yesterday
AMD 3000+
512 X 2 UCCC
A8N-E
and here are some initial results,
Prime + memtest stable ... idling at 40 ish and loaded at 49-50 C.
Vcore : 1.475V
Vdimm : 2.65V
Note that its running at 1T ... A8N-E and 1T ...
hyeah:btw what would be a better oc among the following :
260 X 9 1:1 at 3-4-4-8 IT
or
270-275 X 9 using ram at 333mhz at 3-4-4-8 IT
any suggestions are welcome.
Blade_Runner
Forerunner
yea running the ram 1:1 @ 1t would definitely give you better performance. Using dividers is just for numbers 
^ Isnt the A64 architecture less dependant on memory bandwidth but rather shows better performance from actual CPU clock speeds? (Socket Am2 being a prime example of how the additional mem bandwidth had very little improvement).
An extra 90 ~ 135Mhz on the CPU clock speeds will definately nullify any performance increase the higher mem clocks would show as well.
Nikhil is right though, with the UCCC try cranking up the clocks and see if you're lucky enough to reach the 270Mhz domain. If not, another alternative would be to create an overclocking profile within Windows with the help of A64 Tweaker to use the other mem dividers like 183Mhz.
Hey I have a DFI Ultra-D ! *Hint* *Hint* !
An extra 90 ~ 135Mhz on the CPU clock speeds will definately nullify any performance increase the higher mem clocks would show as well.
Nikhil is right though, with the UCCC try cranking up the clocks and see if you're lucky enough to reach the 270Mhz domain. If not, another alternative would be to create an overclocking profile within Windows with the help of A64 Tweaker to use the other mem dividers like 183Mhz.
deejay said:
Hey I have a DFI Ultra-D ! *Hint* *Hint* !
