blr_p
Skilled
This is the PM putting his stamp on a high risk decision. Second time now. This is a departure from the past where whatever we did was never known. Over a hundred things could go wrong here so previous leaders were wary and risk averse. I read the IAF was saying they could do operations like this as early as the 90's. Why not we got the Mirage's a decade earlier. But the decision was never taken, the LOC was considered sacrosanct and crossing it was out of the question.Then why mention anything about the bombing at all? Should have kept quiet from the beginning and said India did nothing. If they are claiming they sent Mirage 2000 fighter planes to bombard terrorist camps and killed terrorists then prove it. If they don't prove it, there are news media like Reuters who have gone to the villages Pakistan near the place that was attacked and villagers say the place having the JeM people in a mosque is still standing and nothing was destroyed. And the only person injured was a man sleeping who was hit with something while he was asleep in his home. If the Indian govt and IAF is claiming causalities then they should be ready to show the evidence.
What we do know is our jets crossed into their space and dropped bombs in Balakote. We know this by no less than the ISPR spokesman who inadvertently gave the game away when their official line was we only got slightly inside their side of the LOC and then quickly scooted out.
It doesn't matter what we really did just that the domestic audience believes we did it. Sees the government trying to do something. Any thing. And whether they consider this action as sufficient retribution for Pulwama and past atrocities. Initial reactions are positive.
Nobody is laughing at us. On the contrary the reaction would be what took so long. Now an acknowledgement will spread that India is growing up, standing on its own feet and fighting its battles instead of expecting others to do the dirty work. This has an immediate bearing in Afghanistan. An India that is more likely to act means the Paks can no longer take us for granted like in the past.Don't mistake me to not be a non patriotic person. I am patriotic, but I don't want the rest of the world laughing their asses off at the failure of the Indian Air Force and India as a whole when they dropped bombs hundreds of feet away from the target and came back. Even commercial drones, cameras etc being sold to civilians now have some very good night time optics now. 4am in mountains is like twilight conditions. Its enough light for night vision optics to get clear pictures and for the pilot to take a good aim at a mosque or wherever the terrorists were hiding. If the planes didn't have night vision or any good night time capabilities why did they even try doing this? Why didn't they use the SU-K30MKi which is much better and has longer range of flight? If you're going to attack something in the dark, you very well make it 100% and not make a laughing stock of the country! If no one died, is the Indian Air Force going to take responsibility and go again after the target? Will they apologize for making Indians look like fools? Both answers will be no because no one in higher positions knows how to apologize or take responsibility here. If no one died then they look like clowns now.
The statement by the foreign secretary was very clear as to the intent. Pre-emptive, this matters as there is justification in international law that actions were taken to prevent further loss of life. Punitive strikes from what i understand have no basis in law. Even the last raid was on launch pads that would be used to send more militants across the border.
Last edited: