Roxtin said:Well attack on Hindi channel I can understandbut on IBN Lokmat strange SS hitting its own marathi manoos's news channel
![]()
This is the core ruppee question. The old man believes to the contrary.madnav said:SS business is over here in Navi Mumbai (mumbai suburb) years ago and it looks like they need to pack their bags in mumbai too.
Very nicemadnav said:and speaking of native place, he was born in Pune, he as well is a migrant to mumbai imo.
Ard 100-150 years back thackeray dynasty itself migrated from MP to here...(Bal thackerays father)...Now isnt time for them to leave space for localitesand speaking of native place, he was born in Pune, he as well is a migrant to mumbai imo.
X-Rebel said:@Madnav
I m myself an Agri, i will never criticize migration. But as you said we will definetely oppose the unchecked migration if it threatens our city n livelihood.
agri and koli have lost lands worth crores ( to municipal and cidco corps) but they are still happy with overall development.
Cant agree more with that. Good post by u buddy and Magnet.
But still i believe Maharashtrians (don't read Marathis plz, its Maharashtrians) have the first right on Mumbai than others.
kippu said:....and if you feel you have first right or whatever that is , that the same logic will be applied if you want to go abroad for your studies or even go out of state ?
Lord Nemesis said:Well, what you are basically saying is that rich business people who bring opportunities to the folk in Mumbai are welcome, but those who seek a lively hood are not. Is that it? A lot of Maharashtrians at all levels migrated and make their living in other states like AP, Karnataka, Tamil Nadu, Delhi and even here in Punjab. Lets assume that the locals in these places get fed up with the nonsense going on in Mumbai and decide to drive out all the Maharastrians back to mumbai/maharastra. Did you ever consider whats going to happen to Mumbai?
Yours is exactly the kind of attitude that encourages guys like RT to take political advantage of such matters. There are no exceptions and no first rights. India belongs to every Indian. If a tonne of people from other states are making their living in Maharastra, then a tonne of Maharastrans are making their living in other states. Also remember that its the outsiders (both from other states and other countries) that make or break Mumbai. Without these people, Mumbai would be just another one of the countless towns in India.
Lord Nemesis said:Also remember that its the outsiders (both from other states and other countries) that make or break Mumbai. Without these people, Mumbai would be just another one of the countless towns in India.
kippu said:and if you feel you have first right or whatever that is , that the same logic will be applied if you want to go abroad for your studies or even go out of state ?
Lord Nemesis said:Yours is exactly the kind of attitude that encourages guys like RT to take political advantage of such matters. There are no exceptions and no first rights. India belongs to every Indian. If a tonne of people from other states are making their living in Maharastra, then a tonne of Maharastrans are making their living in other states. Also remember that its the outsiders (both from other states and other countries) that make or break Mumbai. Without these people, Mumbai would be just another one of the countless towns in India.
Sei said:
Now, I will myself start distinguishing members based on what their regional/religious/cultural preferences are. Do I need to know that when I'm getting or giving tech knowledge? Sheesh..
[/B]
No I think he is saying that BT was still raging even then but towards a different grp for pretty much the same thing as now. Same old etc.X-Rebel said:Abt 15-20 years back there were much less migrants than there are now ... I will say at that time Mumbai was a much better place to live in than it is today. Are u trying to say that at that time Mumbai was just another small town ??
If ppl feel the need to express their thought why do you have a problem ?Sei said:Oh man, I can't believe everyone is wasting their time here writing in such pointless and stupid threads... Why can't mods put an end to such threads after a page or two? Does it really matter to discuss and argue about such things for lengths with 3-4 paragraphs long posts?
What has tech got to do with the section 'General Talk' ?Sei said:This is a tech forum.. Such threads are okay, but after a time they are pointless. Is there really a need to know which dimwit supports pointless violence and then defends it with counter posts?! Or more posts which are a response to the previous flame posts and are in themselves flame posts?
Ppl feel the need to chat as developments take place.Sei said:I requested the same earlier and again do.. there is no need for these threads to continue unabated.. It's not about the rights of forum members, it is really spoiling the spirit of the forum.
You might, but i usually leave whats said in a thread inside it and most likely forget who said what in a few days time.Sei said:Now, I will myself start distinguishing members based on what their regional/religious/cultural preferences are. Do I need to know that when I'm getting or giving tech knowledge? Sheesh..
One of the things that pisses me off greatly in this country is we have this right 'to feel offended'.
amol_cool said:Well I won't say I don't do that after reading such posts but that still shouldn't make that big difference IMO. Just like we know that such people exists in our society, so they will at this forum too.
I would say why not use this as an opportunity to understand the minds of the people and then understand the exact problem. Running away from a problem is the worst thing. (We all know this but we all do it at times!)