The Trumps & Elon tweets thread (Had to make this since it's never ending)

Minerals.jpg

^he's retweeted what that author said. Hmm, so is this how he's going to play it.

Trump Z.jpg

^When you're in a hole stop digging. Antagonising him won't work.

Bigly.jpg
:woot:
 
Minerals deal was Z's idea to begin with. His grand idea to keep the US involved in the conflict and he is willing to part with half the minerals or whatever his country produces.
Should add that Z's ploy with the minerals deal is to trap the US into providing a security guarantee.

Thing is Trump has flat out refused to offer any security guarantee
 

Luzyanin said the main symbol of American foreign policy was Trump’s “insane, enormously long signature,” and that Trump was “sawing through the Western world.”

Host Yevgeny Popov quipped that Trump was doing Russia’s job for it.

“We wanted to saw the Western world into pieces, but he decided to saw through it himself,” Popov said.
 
Should add that Z's ploy with the minerals deal is to trap the US into providing a security guarantee.

Thing is Trump has flat out refused to offer any security guarantee
Z wants some military enforcement atleast from his perspective while Trump says US presence would be a security guarantee enough both needs to find common ground in this.
 
Z wants some military enforcement atleast from his perspective while Trump says US presence would be a security guarantee enough both needs to find common ground in this.
In simple terms, Z wants regional geo-political level security for his country, well vetted arranged resources sharing is a compromise.
DTrump just want to extract UA's resources without any conditions, security is an after thought, once required resources accumulated UA will be again in trouble. Basically, DTrump's offer is mere hafta vasuli.
 
In simple terms, Z wants regional geo-political level security for his country, well vetted arranged resources sharing is a compromise.
DTrump just want to extract UA's resources without any conditions, security is an after thought, once required resources accumulated UA will be again in trouble. Basically, DTrump's offer is mere hafta vasuli.
Not going to be easy considering Z words for him and Trump isn't one to take such words without action considering he's instead lessening pressure on russians let's see on how it plays out from here on after this disastrous meeting.
 
Not going to be easy considering Z words for him
Moreover, didn't Z speak against dtrump in Pennsylvania before elections. What the heck was Z thinking ?
how it plays out from here on after this disastrous meeting.
Feels this was planned on purpose and Z fell in right into the trap.
Always felt this Z dude slinky creepy. Billions of monies spent on nothing but destruction, brutal disaster and suffering of human life for all over the world and here it is...
 
Moreover, didn't Z speak against dtrump in Pennsylvania before elections. What the heck was Z thinking ?

Feels this was planned on purpose and Z fell in right into the trap.
Always felt this Z dude slinky creepy. Billions of monies spent on nothing but destruction, brutal disaster and suffering of human life for all over the world and here it is...
Yep and JD Vance even brought that to his face while they were arguing about it and tbh there would have been a deal everything was set and ready with binders to the podiums but it was also probably because of how easy it was for Z to get support like he has from the Eu and Biden administration he thought he could get a leverage over the deal which was a bad idea considering Trump's background.
 
Moreover, didn't Z speak against dtrump in Pennsylvania before elections. What the heck was Z thinking?
His criticism stems from a September 2024 visit to a munitions plant in Scranton, Pennsylvania, a battleground state that narrowly backed Trump in November.

"I began my visit to the United States by expressing my gratitude to all the employees at the plant and by reaching agreements to expand cooperation between Pennsylvania and our Zaporizhzhia," Zelensky wrote in a post to X at the time. "It is in places like this where you can truly feel that the democratic world can prevail. Thanks to people like these—in Ukraine, in America, and in all partner countries—who work tirelessly to ensure that life is protected."

Although the visit was not billed as a campaign event, Republicans alleged it amounted to a campaign stop, arguing that it was inappropriate for a foreign leader to attend a political event just weeks before a crucial election. It spurred investigations from House Republicans about whether Zelensky's appearance was an improper use of tax dollars.
That's not really campaigning. Howdy Modi also happened just before US elections (Sep 19) and was an actual rally with Trump, while this was just a plant visit, you will also have to classify that as foreign interference then.
 
Regarding Ceasefire deal between Ukraine & Russia

President Donald Trump directed his administration to "pause" military aid to Ukraine after the contentious meeting in the Oval Office with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy on Friday.
VP vance also said that President Donald Trump's administration is "already working" on a peace plan with the Russians. Vance was asked if the administration would welcome Zelenskyy back if he were willing to come back to the negotiating table. Vance said yes -- if Zelenskyy was willing to seriously engage.
On foreign policy, the president is expected to touch on his efforts to help broker a peace deal between Ukraine and Russia. He is also expected to focus on his administration's efforts to bring home hostages amid the Israel-Hamas conflict.
Dmitry Peskov, Kremlin spokesperson, told reporters. "If the U.S. suspends these supplies, it will probably be the best contribution to peace."

On protests from Students in US Universities, Schools & Colleges

Trump said "All Federal Funding will STOP for any College, School, or University that allows illegal protests," Trump wrote on Truth Social. "Agitators will be imprisoned/or permanently sent back to the country from which they came. American students will be permanently expelled or, depending on on the crime, arrested. NO MASKS! Thank you for your attention to this matter."
The president will push Congress to pass more border security funding for deportations and the border wall, the official said.


Effect of tariffs on China retrospectively

Within minutes of the new U.S. tariffs taking effect, China unveiled on Tuesday its initial response by placing additional 10% to 15% tariffs on imported U.S. goods, like chicken, wheat, soybeans and beef.
The new tariffs of China are set to come into effect for goods shipped out next Monday, March 10.
China imposed tariffs of up to 15 percent on a raft of U.S. farm products and blacklisted more than 20 U.S. companies, marking a major escalation in a brewing trade war between the world’s two largest economies. Trump is increasing tariffs on Chinese products by an additional 10 percentage points, bringing the total tax on some Chinese products to 45 percent. The levies went into effect at 12:01 a.m. Tuesday.


Markets around the world

Wall Street lost momentum before the opening bell Tuesday and markets in Europe and Asia slid after new tariffs were imposed by U.S. President Donald Trump, and more retaliatory tariffs were announced by China.
The declines added to a big selloff Monday. Futures for the S&P 500 and Nasdaq each fell 0.6% in premarket trading. Futures for the Dow Jones Industrial Average slipped 0.3%.
In Europe at midday, Germany's DAX slipped 2.3%, while in Paris the CAC 40 declined 1.4%. Britain's FTSE 100 lost 0.5%.
In Asian trading, Tokyo's Nikkei 225 dropped 1.2% to 37,331.18, while the Hang Seng in Hong Kong lost 0.4% to 22,922.16. The Shanghai Composite index edged 0.2% higher to 3,324.21.
South Korea's Kospi gave up 0.2% to 2,528.92. Taiwan's Taiex shed 0.7%, while Bangkok's SET lost 1.1%.
The Moscow Exchange (MOEX) increased by more than 3 percent from approximately 3,143.12 points to 3,234.94 in the last day.

Effect of tariffs on Canada retrospectively

“Today, after a 30-day pause, the United States administration has decided to proceed with imposing 25 per cent tariffs on Canadian exports and 10 per cent tariffs on Canadian energy. Let me be unequivocally clear – there is no justification for these actions,” the statement said.
“Canada will not let this unjustified action go unanswered. Should American tariffs come into effect tonight, Canada will, effective 12:01am EST tomorrow (Tuesday), respond with 25 per cent tariffs.”
Mr Trump on Monday said there was “no room left to make a deal” and confirmed that his tariffs would go into effect on Tuesday, ending a 30-day pause.
“Because of the tariffs imposed by the US, Americans will pay more for groceries, gas and cars, and potentially lose thousands of jobs,” the statement said.

Source: https://www.msn.com/en-us/feed?ocid=nl_article_link
 
Z wants some military enforcement atleast from his perspective while Trump says US presence would be a security guarantee enough both needs to find common ground in this.
Z wants the security guarantee from Trump who isn't willing to give it.

France & UK are pushing for a ceasefire and to then send their troops into Ukraine as 'peacekeepers'. They will head for Odessa and try to secure the Black sea. Then they can engineer some false flag and cry for the US to come save them. Their attempt is to get a big war in Ukraine or keep the one there from stopping.

The goal has always been to trap the US into fighting for West Europe in Ukraine. Z is being told what to say and do by Starmer & Macron.

Russia doesn't need a ceasefire as they are winning. They outnumber Ukraine, three to one for troops, five to one for artillery and ten to one for artillery vehicles.

The ceasefire seeks to reduce their force projection in areas Russia is good at like long range missiles etc.
 
Z wants the security guarantee from Trump who isn't willing to give it.

France & UK are pushing for a ceasefire and to then send their troops into Ukraine as 'peacekeepers'. They will head for Odessa and try to secure the Black sea. Then they can engineer some false flag and cry for the US to come save them. Their attempt is to get a big war in Ukraine or keep the one there from stopping.

The goal has always been to trap the US into fighting for West Europe in Ukraine. Z is being told what to say and do by Starmer & Macron.

Russia doesn't need a ceasefire as they are winning. They outnumber Ukraine, three to one for troops, five to one for artillery and ten to one for artillery vehicles.

The ceasefire seeks to reduce their force projection in areas Russia is good at like long range missiles etc.
Off topic, since I just saw how meme people have grown up, you should update your profile pic. ;)

1741241194877.png
 
Now I see news and videos suddenly about agent krasnov. Even youtubers like dhruv rathee are almost accusing this somehow.
Dhruv rathee is your leftie liberal opposition who parrots what his counterparts in the US are saying. Those would be the people who lost the recent election to Trump and by some margin.

This is the next chapter in the already baseless Russian collusion false campaign they stuck on him in his first term. Mueller went at it for a year and a half and had nothing to show for at the end. But we got lots of salacious headlines every time suggesting he is compromised. Who has time to waste on this BS.

These people don't want peace. They want constant war with Russia and for the US to step in on their behalf because they cannot do it

European leaders have recently voiced their support for Ukraine following Zelenskyy's contentious meeting with U.S. President Donald Trump.

A hilarious overview of their statements, highlighting their military capabilities and their own problems:

Luxembourg
Prime Minister Xavier Bettel: "We stand with Ukraine!"
Luxembourg's air force consists of two unarmed helicopters and one transport plane. If Russia invades, they'll have to Uber their troops to battle.

Iceland
Prime Minister Katrín Jakobsdóttir: "We won’t give up on you. Slava Ukraini"

No army, just volcanoes. Their war strategy? Hope the enemy slips on ice.

Malta
Prime Minister Robert Abela: "Malta stands firmly with Ukraine."
Their navy consists of a few boats for catching tuna. Maybe they can throw some fish at Putin.

Estonia
Prime Minister Kaja Kallas: "We support Ukraine's sovereignty."
If Russia invades, Estonia will fight them off with stern looks and wooden barricades.

Latvia
President Egils Levits: "Latvia stands with Ukraine."
Their defense strategy? Lure Russians into forests and hope they forget why they came.

Lithuania
President Gitanas Nausėda: "We support Ukraine's fight for freedom."
Lithuania has tanks… but only on paper. Soldiers might have to cycle to battle.

Denmark
Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen: "We stand by Ukraine."
Denmark's best defense? A Lego fortress. Step on one, and you’re out of the war.

Norway
Prime Minister Jonas Gahr Støre: "We stand with Ukraine."
They’ll defend Ukraine by inviting Russians on a deadly fjord hike.

Canada
Prime Minister Justin Trudeau: "We stand with Ukraine."
Canada’s military is so polite, they’ll write “sorry” on every missile.

Poland
Prime Minister Donald Tusk: "Dear @ZelenskyyUa, dear Ukrainian friends, you are not alone."
Poland has tanks, but no ammunition. Maybe they’ll throw pierogis instead.

Spain
Prime Minister Pedro Sánchez: "We stand with Ukraine."
Spain’s military strategy: flamenco dancing until the enemy surrenders from confusion.

Netherlands
Prime Minister Mark Rutte: "We stand with Ukraine."
The Dutch army: flowers in one hand, a bicycle in the other.

Germany
Chancellor Olaf Scholz: "We stand with Ukraine."
Germany's military is so underfunded, their tanks have better luck catching a train than rolling into battle.

France
President Emmanuel Macron: "We stand with Ukraine."
France has nuclear weapons but will first debate war policy over a croissant and a cigarette.

United Kingdom
Prime Minister Keir Starmer: "We stand with Ukraine for as long as it may take."
The UK might send more tanks—if they can find enough working ones.

Collective Defense Against Russia

Excluding France and the UK, none of these countries have nuclear bombs.

Three years into this war, and they still can’t defeat Russia—despite collectively being 10x richer and 5x bigger.

But don’t worry, they’re winning…

Not happening and they need to deal with that. All tricks & stunts to entrap the US into a war against Russia will fail. That leaves attempts to sabotage the peace. This is where Trump can squeeze Z & the euros. Or better still have Z replaced by some one less antagonising to Russia.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Ssreek
Dhruv rathee is your leftie liberal opposition who parrots what his counterparts in the US are saying. Those would be the people who lost the recent election to Trump and by some margin.

This is the next chapter in the already baseless Russian collusion false campaign they stuck on him in his first term. Mueller went at it for a year and a half and had nothing to show for at the end. But we got lots of salacious headlines every time suggesting he is compromised. Who has time to waste on this BS.

These people don't want peace. They want constant war with Russia and for the US to step in on their behalf because they cannot do it

Not happening and they need to deal with that. All tricks & stunts to entrap the US into a war against Russia will fail. That leaves attempts to sabotage the peace. This is where Trump can squeeze Z & the euros. Or better still have Z replaced by some one less antagonising to Russia.

He was fine for many videos related to India. But in this video he says Russia only wanted war becz they want Ukraine land and 'colonialism'. I guess either this is what him and most people "think" or this could the reality, I don't know.

Not happening and they need to deal with that. All tricks & stunts to entrap the US into a war against Russia will fail. That leaves attempts to sabotage the peace. This is where Trump can squeeze Z & the euros. Or better still have Z replaced by some one less antagonising to Russia.

If trump didn't win, kamala would have gone to war with Russia? that could have been worse.