You should live your life and try to make the world a better place for your being in it, whether or not you believe in god. If there is no god, you have lost nothing and will be remembered fondly by those you left behind. If there is a benevolent god, he will judge you on your merits and not just on whether or not you believed in him
Exactly what i wanted to saygreenhorn said:Atheist's Wager - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
I'd rather people did the above than believe in god , and then do all the bad shyte they do instead, because god will forgive/protect/whatever
manu1991 said:To all non atheists , if possible check this movie out :
Religulous (2008)
food for thought!Atheists don't need to disprove your god...
by cavALier1138 (Sun Sep 21 2008 20:10:50)
Ignore this User | Report Abuse Reply
Alright. I'm sick and tired of debates over the existence of a higher power devolving into "Well, you can't prove that my god doesn't exist." We are born atheist. Religion is added on to us by society. Thus, the natural state of things makes us inherently not believe in a higher power (until, of course, we are told that one exists). The burden of proof is, in fact, on the people making outlandish claims- in this case, that their god exists. Don't believe me? Try this one on for size:
There's a unicorn behind you. Right now. No, don't bother looking- he's invisible. You won't get too far trying to hear him either- inaudible. And don't try touching him- he's intangible. In fact, you'll never sense anything that would give you a clue that this unicorn is there. But he is. He's watching your every move. And his name is Fred. Prove me wrong.
Of course, the above demand is ludicrous. You can't prove there isn't a unicorn behind you, and you never will. And an invisible, intangible, inaudible unicorn is much more probable than an invisible, intangible, inaudible, omnipotent, omniscient, omnibenevolent eternal being that has nothing better to do than watch and judge every action on earth. So please, stop asking me to prove you wrong. Try proving yourselves right.
hash said:Ask yourselves two questions.
1. "Did the egg come first or the chicken?"
2. Do you believe in Heaven and Hell.
Type "Syberia Diggings" in Google and report back.
greenhorn said:@ 6pack, usually the burden of proof is on the atheist.
Argument for
Why the Burden of Proof is on the Atheist
and against
Do Atheists Bear a Burden of Proof?
frankly, way over my head :ashamed:
something even more interesting Atheism, Agnosticism, and Burden of Proof
greenhorn said:@ 6pack, usually the burden of proof is on the atheist.
blr_p said:The other point and this for Mr.Khan
An atheist does not believe there is any life after death so question of finding out after is moot.
SharekhaN said:What if there is life after death? This would hold true for a religious person as much it would for an atheist. Same again if there is no life after death. I don't assume that the after life is only for religious people.