UnitedHealthcare CEO's Murder - Looks like everyone is celebrating

This wasn’t some random act of violence; this was symbolic. The gunman didn’t just end a life; he made a statement in a language that corporations and executives might actually understand - violence. It’s the language of last resort for people who feel voiceless, crushed under the weight of impenetrable bureaucracy. A person doesn't wake up one day and decide to assassinate a CEO because their co-pay was too high. This is the logical endpoint of systemic dehumanization.
 
Well as one CEO is killed another insurance company announces this. Imagine losing coverage while your are under anesthesia if surgery takes longer than originally planned. :dead:
Due to bad timing they are halting plans for now. But when dust settles I am sure it will come back.

1733469182173.png


 
  • Angry
Reactions: TEUser2K1
Murdered Insurance CEO Had Deployed an AI to Automatically Deny Benefits for Sick People

Corporate Personhood is used when it benefit corporations.
Is AI supposed to help humans ?
Corporate Personhood idea is exploited to state primary objective of a business corporation is only to make money.
But human / persons forget Milton Friedman's argument that a corporation, unlike a person, cannot have responsibility.
He is perspective was "No one would engage in a business contract with a corporation if they thought for one minute that a corporation was not responsible to pay its bills, for example."
World have to move over from Freidman Doctrine time frame considering new realities, change should be inevitable to corporations too if time demands.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Neotheone
Reminds me of the end of the Watchmen movie.

If it's going to take to murder a few to save millions, would you not save millions?

Corporate Personhood is used when it benefit corporations.
Forget corporates, AI has been used in the US justice system for more than a decade now. Proprietary AI assesses the criminal's background (like where they live, tax they paid last year, parking tickets they have etc.) and calculates a proprietary score based on which a Justice adjusts the sentence term.
 
It shouldn't matter that they use AI to impart justice, what should matter is whether the justice imparted is humane first.
The use of AI precisely throws the humanity away as it runs by numbers, often based on biased data. If someone gets arrested, goes on trial and then gets exonerated because of a process that favours speed over human intervention, it is anything but humane.
 
The use of AI precisely throws the humanity away as it runs by numbers, often based on biased data.
While that is true, and I am completely with you, unfortunately humans run similar biases as well. Despite its flaws, it is possible that over a period of time AI might be able to limit its biases because it would have the advantage of continuing to "learn", maybe even acquire some semblance of "wisdom", and never die.
 
Why blame the messenger?

Insurers are just accountants. They take money from healthy people and spend it on the sick. They do not set the prices, do not design drugs and do not run hospitals. Actuaries, who craft policies for insurance companies, are trained in probability, stats and finance. If the ratio of sick to healthy rises, either the premiums go up or treatment gets rationed.

Maybe ask why more people are getting sick or why treatments cost so much. How about blame a food or a pharma company CEO? Or the guardians of morality who sell 'beautiful at any size' or 'sky-daddy loves you just the way you are' to vulnerable individuals.

Murdered Insurance CEO Had Deployed an AI to Automatically Deny Benefits for Sick People
So he used AI to do his job. Is that a bad thing? Insurance companies have always used statistical models to decide premiums and coverage.
 
Last edited:
This wasn’t some random act of violence; this was symbolic. The gunman didn’t just end a life; he made a statement in a language that corporations and executives might actually understand - violence. It’s the language of last resort for people who feel voiceless, crushed under the weight of impenetrable bureaucracy. A person doesn't wake up one day and decide to assassinate a CEO because their co-pay was too high. This is the logical endpoint of systemic dehumanization.
You really believe the underlined part?

In a dictatorship that is how it's done. Not in a democracy.

Impenetrable bureaucracy? How hard did this guy try to deal with them. Where is the evidence he did.

Seems he went straight to the top and played executioner.

What's to say execs won't write him off as some one with a mental health problem or radical ?

.... and continue as is
 
You really believe the underlined part?
lolz. See how corpns reacted to this, they even removed names of ceos from their websites, increased security, what not. In chronically toxic capitalistic environment all this is to protect corpn's interest, ceo is also just a big pawn unless financially well connected to corpn. They 'understood' it's serious, but now customers will have to bear the cost of their extravagant security too.
In a dictatorship that is how it's done. Not in a democracy.
Who said it's democracy, their own reseach say they are oligarchy. Democracy is just a front-face.
Oh in democracies, only top guy is allowed to shoot the bottom guys, in dictactorship random guys can shoot a ceo ?
Impenetrable bureaucracy? How hard did this guy try to deal with them. Where is the evidence he did.
lolz. For decades people from top to bottom of 'murrican hyrarchy tried everything they can do to at-least minutely correct medical and insurance malpractices. It's one of the main issue in that nations voting, several presidents made changes, but to what result ?
But nothing came out of it becasue the beast with tentacles is not only grown within that country, but already extending it's tentacles outside their country becoming a blood sucking parasite on humanity.
What's to say execs won't write him off as some one with a mental health problem or radical ?
It will be win for that person if they wrote him off as a radical. Because in environments like that, only radicals can bring massive change.
Common man never support violence, but what do you expect being in the most powerful country and treated like dirt by that same system ? What all this power is for, only to create wars and misery in other geographies ?
.... and continue as is
Not a single word from you about the sadistic antics practiced by these nasty narcissistic ceos, their standard practice being symbolically etched to those three bullets. Not a single world about suffering of people.
So, what do you expect from your own comments, looks like you don't want any change in the system even after violence happened ? Unfortunately, if system does not take care of itself, weakness will be exposed one way or other. So, they may have to deal with all this and people may have to suffer, sad realities.
 
Last edited:
Who said it's democracy, their own reseach say they are oligarchy. Democracy is just a front-face.
It's a democracy
Oh in democracies, only top guy is allowed to shoot the bottom guys, in dictactorship random guys can shoot a ceo ?
Yes. If no Ballot then bullet
lolz. For decades people from top to bottom of 'murrican hyrarchy tried everything they can do to at-least minutely correct medical and insurance malpractices. It's one of the main issue in that nations voting, several presidents made changes, but to what result ?
But nothing came out of it becasue the beast with tentacles is not only grown within that country, but already extending it's tentacles outside their country becoming a blood sucking parasite on humanity.
Get a job with health benefits. That is how most people manage. If you're self-employed you can get your own plan.
It will be win for that person if they wrote him off as a radical. Because in environments like that, only radicals can bring massive change.
Common man never support violence, but what do you expect being in the most powerful country and treated like dirt by that same system ?
Are you defending a murderer? Everything else you said is irrelevant.

The guy went to an ivy league college and is well off.

So what is his problem?

If this guy was much older. Had paid into the system and got screwed. The thing to do is sue. Not shoot.

This is what democracy means. Having several options.

Not a single word from you about the sadistic antics practiced by these nasty narcissistic ceos, their standard practice being symbolically etched to those three bullets. Not a single world about suffering of people.
I don't support terrorists.

If people take the law into their own hand there will be chaos.
So, what do you expect from your own comments, looks like you don't want any change in the system even after violence happened ? Unfortunately, if system does not take care of itself, weakness will be exposed one way or other. So, they may have to deal with all this and people may have to suffer, sad realities.
I've already told you what Americans do. And I've lived there
 
Last edited:
I've already told you what Americans do. And I've lived there
I already see what they do, as of now I don't want to live there.
Common man never support violence,
Are you defending a murderer?
I'm a common man, you can take it the way you like. A soldier is not a murderer, if he is fighting for our country.

btw, the highlight of all your comments are nothing but "Everything else you said is irrelevant.". Yeah, no, it goes both ways.
 
Go and challenge what I said. Can you?
Lolz. Can't wake a person who is pretending to be asleep, however one try.

Look for reason why there is massive support on online forums by people towards this person who did such a violent act.
All that happens due to reasons, mere linguistic gymnastics is not going to solve any issues, rather amplifying issues more.
Malcolm X have described situations like this very well, when the system suppress peaceful methods in every manner possible, violence inevitably is result.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Neotheone