lol you consider Kai a reviewer?! anything without a Leica label is "whatever" to him,their videos are just for popcorn timepass viewing
nex-7: is better how? @ 12800 ISO? what percentage of your shots would be at 12800 ISO unless it was just for testing purpose?
the results between the the E-m5 and nex-7 are identical till ISO 3200
only thing better on the nex-7 compared to the e-m5 is the video quality and resolution (not IQ)
also to note the IBIS on the E-M5 is so good that people are reporting tack sharp images at upto 1/8th shutter speed handheld...in that case why would anyone need to go above ISO 3200?
P.S:i know ur more experienced than to state stuff like a camera is better coz it has more megapixels...makes you sound like a noob
here is a better comparison
http://soundimageplu...part-10_28.html
http://www.stevehuff...ony-nex-7-jpeg/
in the DPreview article,go to the dynamic range page,select Auto DR on the E-m5 and the nex-7 and see which has the broader Dynamic range
x-pro 1: its better yes i agree,but wat good is it if it cant lock focus? and it not only in low light,the fuji has trouble with AF in bright light too
also it costs $1500 BODY ONLY compared to $999 for the E-M5 body only
Engadget reviews the E-M5:
http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/01/olympus-om-d-em-5-micro-four-thirds-camera-review/
"Images shot throughout that spectrum are usable at any size. ISO 25,600 looks quite fantastic, as you'll see in the 1:1 pixel views below. As with most mirrorless cameras with a MFT or larger sensor, you could quite comfortably leave the E-M5 set to ISO 3200 for casual shooting without any significant quality loss, but we'd even be willing to push that limit to 6400 or higher if shooting in low light."
"More in line with the E-M5's $1,300 kit tag would be Sony's NEX-7, which can be had for a cool $1,350 with an included 18-55mm lens. Many photographers have gripes with Sony's lens selection, however, arguing that the kit optic simply doesn't offer performance to match the camera's 24.3-megapixel sensor. If you can invest in higher-end lenses, like the $1,300 24mm Carl Zeiss Sonnar T f/1.8, and need to capture larger images, you may still consider Sony's NEX flagship, but if you're simply comparing both kits, the E-M5 seems like the winner here as well."
"...there hasn't been a better time to hop aboard Micro Four Thirds."
