Which notebook compares to 13" MacBook Air 2013 ?

madmaniac said:
1440x900 is not so bad on a 13" you will only notice the difference if you are coming down from a retina but after a while you dont notice anymore.
And OSX is made such that it doesn't require the extra touch functionality which just smudges your screen. The Trackpad makes up for it.

BTW haven't put up the pics/opinions yet. been real busy just getting all the apps and using the air.
will do soon.
Click to expand...

But that's the whole point, why compromise with "not so bad"? The difference is night and day, and it's not just the resolution like I mentioned before.

As for touchscreen, that is completely inaccurate. The same Gorilla Glass tech used in phones is present in touch laptops, and think about where you ever see smudges on your phone? Probably only in broad daylight, and you are much more unlikely to use a laptop there. In short, not an issue at all. Furthermore, with Windows 8 touchscreens are extremely useful. Once you are used to touch, there's no going back. I would say it is essential for most normal usage and personally I wouldn't even look at a laptop without a touchscreen. Most people who have actually lived with a touchscreen laptop would say the same. Of course there are situations where it is not that useful, but for most normal usage it is invaluable. The touchpad is hardly a substitute for a touchscreen, but more of a complement. Together, the touchpad+touchscreen+keyboard combination works wonders.
 
Sub said:
But that's the whole point, why compromise with "not so bad"? The difference is night and day, and it's not just the resolution like I mentioned before.

As for touchscreen, that is completely inaccurate. The same Gorilla Glass tech used in phones is present in touch laptops, and think about where you ever see smudges on your phone? Probably only in broad daylight, and you are much more unlikely to use a laptop there. In short, not an issue at all. Furthermore, with Windows 8 touchscreens are extremely useful. Once you are used to touch, there's no going back. I would say it is essential for most normal usage and personally I wouldn't even look at a laptop without a touchscreen. Most people who have actually lived with a touchscreen laptop would say the same. Of course there are situations where it is not that useful, but for most normal usage it is invaluable. The touchpad is hardly a substitute for a touchscreen, but more of a complement. Together, the touchpad+touchscreen+keyboard combination works wonders.
Click to expand...

You cannot compare touch in windows 8 to mac because mac hasnt released a touch os yet. I don't know if you've used a mac touchpad before but its gazillion times better than windows touchpad.
 
Any idea guys whats the last date to Avail discount
Currently lots of store in mumbai are out of stock with the Latest MBA 2013 version
 
madmaniac said:
You cannot compare touch in windows 8 to mac because mac hasnt released a touch os yet. I don't know if you've used a mac touchpad before but its gazillion times better than windows touchpad.
Click to expand...

The lack of touch in this case counts as a major dealbreaker, in the OS or otherwise. As for touchpads, it depends on the machine. I totally agree that Macbook Air has one of the best touchpads, better than almost all Windows laptops, but there are Windows laptops with great ones too. Such as Thinkpad X1 Carbon which I would say is even better. The gestures in Windows 8 are a major improvement, and the configurable three finger gestures are very useful.

Having a good touchpad is not in any way whatsoever a valid excuse for the fact that the lack of touchscreen is a major drawback that Apple needs to address immediately. Touchpads are NOT an alternative for touchscreens.
 
Current Macbook pro retina Display 13 inch Gives 8 hours Plus Battery Life
Current Macbook Pro 2013 13 inch the says last 12 hour but eventually U get 8 to 9 hours..
2012 mba 13 inch still gives 5 to 6 hours if its calibrated properly .
Haswell is just Mimic on part of apple..

One Should Only Buy Apple products doing a small research..

Thats my point of view.
 
destiny said:
Current Macbook pro retina Display 13 inch Gives 8 hours Plus Battery Life
Current Macbook Pro 2013 13 inch the says last 12 hour but eventually U get 8 to 9 hours..
2012 mba 13 inch still gives 5 to 6 hours if its calibrated properly .
Haswell is just Mimic on part of apple..

One Should Only Buy Apple products doing a small research..

Thats my point of view.
Click to expand...


I can understand your point of view after knowing u just bought a new mac pro retina

Im not saying u made a bad choice but to say new haswell is not good enough is debatable .

Current macbook pro gives 7 hours not 12

Theres a big difference between 7 and 12.

There is always something better ....
The is IR problem in current retinas , altough its no big deal .

But thinking new haswell will have ,
1 .Battery around 10 hours
2. Much faster SSD
3. Fast wifi
4. Much better integrated gpu hd5100

And is around the corner , makes little sense to wait it out a little
Right now Macbook air is solid choice but lack of 8gb version is a deal breaker for me
 
blkrb0t said:
@destiny You're just going through Post-purchase rationalization.

It's a great device, but saying that Haswell is just a mimic? Especially when it comes to battery life? Every reviewer says otherwise.
Click to expand...

Haswell is not a mimic certainly, but what he is trying to say and with which I concur is that Haswell makes sense much more for people who could actually use the 12hr battery life.
I would rather buy the cheaper last year model because there aint much difference performance wise and I couldn't fathom a situation in which I would need to use it on battery for more than 3-4 hrs. Also Macbooks always had better battery life than their Windows counterparts so even the older model can run on battery for at least 4-5 hrs.
In the end it is all about priorities. For my kinda usage I would rather save the money and buy the rMBP's last year model.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Macbook air 2012 i5 1.8ghz
Macbook air 2013 i5 1.3ghz
http://anandtech.com/show/7058/2013-macbook-air-pcie-ssd-and-haswell-ult-inside

The 1.8GHz i5 in the 13-inch ended up being a bit quicker than the 1.3GHz 4250U this generation in the multithreaded test, but in single threaded performance the two are equal. The impact on the MT test is about 5%, it's there but not substantial. Don't be fooled by base clock, it's the combination of base clock, max turbo and cooling solution that'll determine performance here. As we found in our Haswell ULT review, CPU performance isn't something you can expect to see more of with Haswell vs. Ivy Bridge in these low wattage platforms.
 
Im thinking of buying mac air right now and then sell later for retina haswell if its worth it.[DOUBLEPOST=1374048643][/DOUBLEPOST]Macbook air new model is not in stock in chandigarh
 
Guys I need to run linux and Windows on a mac - very bad question I know...
Then its not worth to get a macbook air?
As it wont be giving that much backup on windows/linux as compared to OSX?
 
@nishthecooldude If your primary OS is not OSX on a Macbook then better wait for other alternatives with Haswell to show up. A Macbook makes sense when your primary OS is OSX. I have used OSX on a Hackintosh and for a complete experience I am shifting to a Macbook.

@hbksabhi Its out of stock everywhere in Delhi. Expected within next 7-10 days.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
@Switch
Haswell MBA available in nehru place...goto HOT in nehru place metro station but they are giving less discount...

I need to buy very quickly ....
Within this week only....
Am thinking of going with any ivy bridge windows lappy for the time being...
As I need to run linux and Windows more
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Back
Top