I haven't been derogatory to you and if I've been, then I am extremely sorry for that, as all I wanted was that this thread doesn't turn into a battlefield like so many other threads have lately.
So can you answer this for me.
I have no bias against Xiaomi or any other brand. In fact, I would probably end up buying this TV, but my Plasma has spoiled me over the years. Following Hifivisions recommendations, even I was considering picking up Toshiba's 7980/8080. But don't you think that such misleading specs by the company also makes this TV a somewhat dubious choice. Who knows what all other things they have lied about. Yes, it offers amazing real estate for the price, but wouldn't I be better off buying an LG OLED by putting in a little extra as LG have a much better track record than MI at this.
Forgive me too if came in as rude before. It was never about LG OLED Vs this TV and you were trying to turn it in to that saying he said that while it was fenix who said to get the OLED and not him and i was only talking against his comment, not anyone else. He kept favouring only Samsung/Sony/LG with no models mentioned but a blank statement saying you can't compare it to any of these three brands.
Now to your query, I couldn't find Mi stating it as 10bit panel anywhere in Indian website so I checked it in the global site and it's clearly written 8bit+FRC. And coming to the 4k 120hz that's just marketing, if you see their disclaimer they clearly state this "The Mi QLED TV 75 does not support 4K video streaming at 120fps decoding (input) due to
hardware limitations. The TV can decode upto 1080p at 120fps and 4K at 60fps natively. The TV
will upscale the input source to output 120fps using Reality Flow 120(MEMC) to match native
refresh rate of the panel"
They even say the same in their FAQ.
So they can't be blamed for that. I'm attaching screenshots for all these statements so you can check for yourself.
And technically they don't mention brightness in Indian site like they do in their global site but if you've been following hifivision you'd know many people mention 800nits brightness which is not advertised 1000nits but we need more accurate testing before we can finalize it's true brightness but for now we know it's 800 nits which is actually good. It's not like they're putting HDR and only 400nits which is bare minimum and useless for HDR like many other TVs are advertising, even their own 55 inch has bad brightness. Is it less? yes! but is it to the point you can't watch it out enjoy it like those "top brands TVs" No! It's on par if not better depending on which models you compare it to from the top brands. Do check there, someone posted a picture of the TV in their room near the windows and it's plenty bright in that room.
And finally OLEDs, if you want the best then you'll be better off with the OLED but is it miles better? I can't say that for sure because I've seen OLED in my friend's and haven't checked out this TV yet but from the technical specs I'd say it's not worth the price difference if you're planning 65/75 oleds. For 55 inch LG OLED against this one? Definitely the 55 inch. But at that point it's only fair to compete it against a 55 inch like Toshiba U7980 which is like 47k and LG is like 120k+. That's another discussion. Do ask your questions there, there are many who know much more than me in that forum who can help you with these doubts.
www.hdblog.it
