CPU/Mobo Intel Ivy Bridge Discussion Thread

http://www.bit-tech.net/news/hardware/2012/03/28/ivy-bridge-launch-leaked/1

New evidence suggests that Intel is planning a tiered roll-out of its next-generation Ivy Bridge processor family, announcing the quad-core chips in April and the mobile-centric dual-core versions in June.

Following reports from numerous industry sources that the launch of Ivy Bridge will be delayed until June, Intel was forced to admit that there had been a schedule slip. While Intel's Sean Maloney claimed the delay would see no Ivy Bridge chips reaching customers until June, Jon Carvill claimed that the schedule 'has only been impacted by a few weeks' as a result of what is believed to be either oversupply problems of current-generation Sandy Bridge parts or yield issues with the new parts.

Now, it looks like both Maloney and Carvill were both right: while quad-core parts will be appearing towards the end of April, it will be June before Ivy Bridge dual-core chips arrive on the market.

The updated schedule comes courtesy of Swedish technology site Sweclockers, which claims to have discovered Intel's updated launch schedule. Under the new timings, the supporting chipsets for the Ivy Bridge platform - Z77, Z75, H77, and B75 - will be launched on Ivy Bridge's original launch date of 8th April.

This launch will be followed by actual chips later in the month, on 29th April. These parts will, however, only be quad-core desktop and mobile parts comprising the Core i5-3450, Core i5-3550, Core i5-3550S, Corei5-3570K, Core i5-3570T, Core i7-3770, Core i7-3770K, Core i7-3770S, Core i7-3770T, Core i7-3720QM, Core i7-3820QM, and the Core i7-2920XM.

Processors missing from the April launch, largely mobile-centric dual-core parts, will appear on the 3rd June. This release will add the Core i5-3470, Core i5-3470S, Core i5-3470T, Core i5-3475S, Core i5-3570 and Core i5-3570S desktop parts, along with the Core i5-3320M, Core i5-3360M, Core i5-3427U, Core i7-3520M and Core i7-3667U mobile parts.

Finally, CPU World claims that the budget-friendly Core i3 family will be launched in the third quarter of this year. The chips due to drop at that point are the Core i3-3220, Core i3-3220T, Core i3-3225, Core i3-3240, Core i3-3240T, and the Core i3-3217U.

Intel, naturally, isn't confirming the leaked launch schedule, stating only that it 'refuses to comment on rumour or speculation regarding unannounced products.'

olgUC.jpg


Thanks to what appears to be a leaked schedule of Intel’s upcoming Ivy Bridge processors, it seems that we can expect a host of Intel Ivy Bridge chipsets to start launching between April 22nd and April 28th

http://www.ubergizmo...ly-been-leaked/
 
So a full month to go ? Thats too long... interestingly the price points are the same at which SB is currently selling in the market (in $ terms) ... so expect very similar INR prices too ?
 
Will the ivy bridge carry any premium over the sandy bridge ? . I read on some sites that Ivy will cost the same as sandy , but is it only for the US or valid for INDIA too ? .
 
well advantages are

1)lower tdp

2)better ipc

3)cheaper to make (not the same as cheaper to buy)

4)way better graphics

5)the "tick" in intels strategy
 
Is that supposed to be a sarcastic statement ?
<
... cos, lower TDPs dont seem to be apparent (going by everyone on the thread above you), it is not being cheaper, "tick" means nothing to the consumer if there is no benefit in performance or value, and the graphics... well, decent benefit to a minority crowd, so a minor benefit...

IPC is the only reason why I thought you might actually be serious
<
 
really disappointed if this is true... #cyberwarfare some of the links here suggest that the TDP is the same as SB.

http://www.overclock.net/t/1242313/more-ivy-bridge-benchmarks-sandybridge-comparison-3770k-on-the-way-d/0_100

his screenies show cpu-z showing tdp of 77w

Is that supposed to be a sarcastic statement ?
tongu23e.gif
... cos, lower TDPs dont seem to be apparent (going by everyone on the thread above you), it is not being cheaper, "tick" means nothing to the consumer if there is no benefit in performance or value, and the graphics... well, decent benefit to a minority crowd, so a minor benefit...

IPC is the only reason why I thought you might actually be serious
happy19.gif

not sarcastic at all. hd 4000 is a huge improvement over hd3000. using virtu makes the whole case a lot lot better.

it is said that a 4.65G IVB chip is ~ 5.0G SB chip. i think thats quite decent. also a thread on XS showed that the E0 stepping (engineering samples) are better binned than E1 stepping (retail) and that this lot cot have problems on air. he suggested that we wait for E2 stepping for the "heat issue" to vanish
 
Back
Top