India doesn't have too many companies which have Larger Global Footprint, as opposed to western countries. If one think about monopolies then one should also consider how western nations enforce themselves on other countries. its not always the goverment does seldome. its always done using companies which have hold on them. How one thinks western companies which we use in our everyday life is so promiment if their goverment is not supporting them to expand, pave ways for their expantions.
That is the Chinese model after they were advised to create 'state champions' in the 80s.
Adani won the port bid in Haifa so that Haifa would not become entirely Chinese run. Adani didn't just show up there and win he needed help from some external players. Am interested to know how the Americans got the Chinese to
withdraw their bid
See the timing, soon as he acquires the port, the report comes out. As Bibi says, exit point, entry point. Strategic right. Someone didn't like Adani winning that bid. WHO ?
As I mentioned in an earlier post, the plan is simple, we acquire ports along the routes that matter to us and we are free of any Chinese attempts to disrupt us.
The Chinese are the ones doing these proxy attacks. They are the ones with the most to lose with a rising India. They are the ones that would want to disrupt a resilient supply chain that works around them. They are the competition.
Two years were spent plotting this hit job on Adani. That this is the guy who is into ports more than others makes it obvious. All well and good to say we should have more people in this game but there aren't people with the focus or deep pockets like him for it yet.
Govt's work is to make footprint and companies does the legwork. Adani is one of them. more will rise sooner or latter.....
See the startups in the defense sector for example. We're well on our way to creating our own MIC