dafreaking
Herald
This is the major downside with zoom lenses. How long you have to carry it around.Buying an SLR is just a start or one matter. Carrying it around is another.
Then you've not understood the purpose for a 50mm lens. In a cramped space a 35mm would be better.Just talking in perspective of their versatility for a normal user or a starter. I personally will never buy a prime or zoom lenses that start from 50 or 70. My pick is always wide angle.. Or at least a 35mm.
yes in this case its more practical. But there are many situations that call for different tools. The hardest is knowing what you want and then matching.I don't do artsy pics just take for gathering, outings, trips etc. In those, I want more focal range. Not a fixed one. Why not a zoom then you ask? Of course but only ones like 18-200 or 18-270 or 18-300 coz I don't like carrying multiple lenses and I need close up shots. Very much. With a fixed length I keep running around or sometimes there is not space to walk back and focus. And In a group, many wont be patient or understanding of my camera's limitation.
Then you're not taking photos you're merely documenting events.My photos are more of a time capsule rather than a artistic definition to me.
What ?But nowadays getting a DSLR is a norm. :S :S.
Why does it feel wrong ? if its much lighter and serves the purpose what is the need to lug around all that weight. If you think having a dSLR gives you more cachet then you're hiding behind the camera. A DSLR does not mean beter photos. You take the photo, the camera is just a tool.When I take a normal cam, bridge cam, 3/4 in hand.. it just feels wrong. If i don't hear that shutter sound, I be like.. Did it take the pic?. And the Image qlty that it offers comparing to any Imaging devices I mention here, Even with the bare basic Kit lens.
It seems they would want more zoom than picture quality.I have been trying to tell my parents the same for a long time. My Dad has a 808 Pureview right now but wants to buy a DSLR. I will try and limit him to a good high zoom P&S or even a micro 4-3rd, but according to him, if he is spending that much, it's better to get a DSLR.
What ?
No DSLR isn't the norm. compacts are the norm and phones are slowly filling that space.
Why does it feel wrong ? if its much lighter and serves the purpose what is the need to lug around all that weight. If you think having a dSLR gives you more cachet then you're hiding behind the camera. A DSLR does not mean beter photos. You take the photo, the camera is just a tool.
If you want more options a DSLR is better. When you shed weight then you have to make compromises. I don't mean image quality here but flexibility that interchangeable lenses offer. Better execution, more options. A general purpose tool.
TBH i don't know why you even use a DSLR, if you're documenting life a high end compact with appropriate zoom would be much better.
Course we're talking photos here, if you do video as well then DSLRs will have an edge over compacts.[DOUBLEPOST=1389692446][/DOUBLEPOST]The D7000 does not have an articulated viewfinder, i find that a hinderance. A camera with D7000 quality with such a viewfinder would be much better.
This is the major downside with zoom lenses. How long you have to carry it around.
Then you've not understood the purpose for a 50mm lens. In a cramped space a 35mm would be better.
yes in this case its more practical. But there are many situations that call for different tools. The hardest is knowing what you want and then matching.
Then you're not taking photos you're merely documenting events.
He meant when people start having a job and have saved up some money, all have this vision of being a photographer and start purchasing DSLRs. Soon ,we see them embedding their watermark into their photos and start creating a page in Facebook under XYZ photography . Illusion of being a successful photographer accomplished.What ?
No DSLR isn't the norm. compacts are the norm and phones are slowly filling that space.
This is actually the story of a lot of peopleHe meant when people start having a job and have saved up some money, all have this vision of being a photographer and start purchasing DSLRs. Soon ,we see them embedding their watermark into their photos and start creating a page in Facebook under XYZ photography . Illusion of being a successful photographer accomplished.
The norm for what ? that is what i don't understand.It is the Norm. Just check the number of Which DSLR threads here. and the numerous requests from people i know offline. Stop arguing for the sake of arguing.
The norm for what ? that is what i don't understand.
So they end up with average shots using expensive equipment. What was the point of even getting a dslr in that case.Everyone and their uncles want a DSLR! Most end up using it on full AUTO. Some use it on Aperture or Shutter priority and very few on full manual.
These guys are just posers.He meant when people start having a job and have saved up some money, all have this vision of being a photographer and start purchasing DSLRs. Soon ,we see them embedding their watermark into their photos and start creating a page in Facebook under XYZ photography . Illusion of being a successful photographer accomplished.
I asked you to explain what norm means. Can you do that or not ?I am excited to buy something i saved up for 2 years. My money, My excitement. Please stop talking about someone else when you don't know anything.