TechHead said:
@Ryan - wait up for a bit.. I (gently!) disagree with Anish.. I'd stick it out with the S3IS, instead of ponying up for the S5.. incremental upgrade, not worth it, IMO.
EDIT: The movie mode on the S5 is better... if movies are important.. go with the S5.
Well my point why the S5 is worth the extra 2.5k or so is :
Second gen IS, better USM, and DIGIC 3 (Not to mention a bigger LCD, brighter EVF and movie mode (as you said)) kill it for the S5.
Also service will be a LOT easier with most Canon service stores stocking S5 parts.
Moreover since his dealer is ready to exchange the cam, I don't see why he shouldn't go in for one. And do note that he doesn't plan to upgrade soon (Which is quite unlikely though

)
Roxtin said:
Which SLR is better 40D or Rebel XT?
The 40D and Rebel XT are in completely different price brackets. I think you meant the Nikon D40. In that case, I'd pick the Rebel XT for the superior 8MP sensor and better High ISO performance
Private Ryan said:
So can u help me out make a decision? Is the Sony Cybershot H7/H9 a good cam?? (better or similar to the S5?? :S )
Digital Cameras Side-by-Side, 3 cameras: Digital Photography Review
H9 seems better with a 3" LCD, better focal range (31-465mm effective), HD Video Out and some more goodies, while the Canon has better AF and slightly better IQ.
Read the review, if the extras on the H9 can be used by you, get it then, great cam certainly!
Keane 16 said:
I'm a n00b with cams, but the generally Sony cams are supposed to be crap for aspiring semi-pro photographers...
Not really, a lot of the Sony compacts have full manual settings, agreed that high ISO performance sucks, but the H-series are good, DPayne from this forum uses the H2 and his images are brilliant! (Check the photography thread)