This is how it stands so far IMO:
ATi Radeon HD4850:
Pros:
1)Offers better performance than 9800 GTX overall, and better than 9800 GTX+ at higher resolutions and higher levels of AA and AF.
2)Very cheap if ordered from US. Launch price is 200$, sure to get down to 169$ in a month's time :hap2:
3)DirectX 10.1 support.
Cons:
1)Runs very hot (79C idle temp!!). Impossible to keep card unless you are going to install aftermarket cooler.
2)Pricing here in India will be atrocious. So for the average joe it is not a viable option at all.
3)No PhysX support. Supports Havok, but no drivers out for it yet.
Geforce 9800 GTX+:
Pros:
1)Faster than HD4850 at lower resolutions/lowers levels of AA and AF. So anyone with a 17"/19" monitor might find slightly better performance than HD4850.
2)Support for PhysX.
3)Stock cooling is very effective (idle temperature 55C).
4)Pricing in India will not be as inflated as HD4850.
Cons:
1)Not as good at higher resolutions/higher levels of AA and AF.
2)No directX 10.1 support (though games utilising it are not out yet).
3)Costs 30$ more than HD4850 if ordering from US (in India it'll probably be cheaper!)
ATi Radeon HD4850:
Pros:
1)Offers better performance than 9800 GTX overall, and better than 9800 GTX+ at higher resolutions and higher levels of AA and AF.
2)Very cheap if ordered from US. Launch price is 200$, sure to get down to 169$ in a month's time :hap2:
3)DirectX 10.1 support.
Cons:
1)Runs very hot (79C idle temp!!). Impossible to keep card unless you are going to install aftermarket cooler.
2)Pricing here in India will be atrocious. So for the average joe it is not a viable option at all.
3)No PhysX support. Supports Havok, but no drivers out for it yet.
Geforce 9800 GTX+:
Pros:
1)Faster than HD4850 at lower resolutions/lowers levels of AA and AF. So anyone with a 17"/19" monitor might find slightly better performance than HD4850.
2)Support for PhysX.
3)Stock cooling is very effective (idle temperature 55C).
4)Pricing in India will not be as inflated as HD4850.
Cons:
1)Not as good at higher resolutions/higher levels of AA and AF.
2)No directX 10.1 support (though games utilising it are not out yet).
3)Costs 30$ more than HD4850 if ordering from US (in India it'll probably be cheaper!)