Is mtnl landline broadband user facing this problem?

Status
Not open for further replies.
vishalk said:
update

24361249 is the nox number i got from 1504, call them and i got my speeds back
Click to expand...

Ho Man I Just Removed My Telephone & DSL Splitter, And Connected The Router Cable To MTNL Line Directly Without Splitter.

Got Connected In Seconds. Its Working Now

But Speeds Are slow I m on 512 UL Plan But Only Get Following Speeds.

1212448557.png


Now Will Have To Connect The Phone Again To Call These F*****s
 
I run my internet connection with my modem in my room, and the only telephone in the other room , with the splitter hooked up to the telephone. Least disturbace.
 
Well, I've had it all day, but been downloading stuff at my plan speeds. :S
 
My internet has not been down, but back to plan speeds. Man it sucks, so should I upgrade my plan to 1 mbps, or move on to a more expensive but stable reliance 1 mbps plan (1500 pm)
 
Well it's been stable for the last 12 hours or so now. I hope it stays that way. I also check with Reliance for their Wireline facility and they say there is no feasibility in my area. It seems their "uber-expensive" Wi-Max is the only option, which I'm not really interested in. So I'll stick with MTNL and pray it rectifies the issue.
 
Speeds reduced from 51 to 29~30 on torrents. using 512 UL plan. downstream speeds have been changed since a long time from 608 to 512
 
OK so far so good. It's been more than 24 hours and faced no disconnection till now. Hope it stays that way. What a relief to finally get some stability after such a bad ordeal. :)
 
Thats lucky. I'm still having disconnection problems. Now its getting awfully annoying.
 
I'll do it soon. But the net disconnects VERY often. Much more than it used to. And I have the modem set manually to GDMT and Annex A. I can't afford to put it at autosync up because then it just takes TOO long to get the connection back.
 
198 is the fastest way to resolve all problems even faster the customer care 1504
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom