LCD TV Buyin Dilemma
- Thread starter knoughtyd
- Start date
hyeah:
Shripad
Guide
gmano said:
Its really over rated model. Looks good if you see it alone. vibrant colours even make people go OO ahhh in showrooms. But they miss the lack of details on screen. The contrast is poor compared to both R81 and Bravia. On screen contrast is just 1000:1.
And the engine works very badly for SD signals. Even if you manually try to adjust the colours. It wases out the details from the bright areas of picture making it look too bright. Shades of red and blue are over saturated.
This problem is noticeable only when you glance at other good models, otherwise the good bright, saturated colours fool people.
And I dont trust Cnet at all, also they havent reviewed the 32S310 themself
dad went to vijay sales 2day....n tat Sales guy threw sum tech stuff abt LG one tat it has high contrast ratio n all those stuff pluss its damn cheap to compared to others(with home theatre)
so i guess after that Demo he has shifted his loyalities to LG(since its cheap n looks gud)
so is it LG really bad as it is made out to be...or can i go with it(will be plain using Cable Tv)
so i guess after that Demo he has shifted his loyalities to LG(since its cheap n looks gud)
so is it LG really bad as it is made out to be...or can i go with it(will be plain using Cable Tv)
coolraghav
Contributor
if yah got good money then go for Hitachi or Pioneer..both are great
or from your choices..jus go for sony blindly
or from your choices..jus go for sony blindly
Saw the Sony and the LG LCD's @ Vijay sales yesterday. Yes the Sony is way better than LG. The LG tv is not bad at all. Tatasky looked best on Sony> Philips Samsung> LG.Funky said:Its really over rated model. Looks good if you see it alone. vibrant colours even make people go OO ahhh in showrooms. But they miss the lack of details on screen. The contrast is poor compared to both R81 and Bravia. On screen contrast is just 1000:1.
And the engine works very badly for SD signals. Even if you manually try to adjust the colours. It wases out the details from the bright areas of picture making it look too bright. Shades of red and blue are over saturated.
This problem is noticeable only when you glance at other good models, otherwise the good bright, saturated colours fool people.
And I dont trust Cnet at all, also they havent reviewed the 32S310 themself
whatever you buy...... please see the after sales service !!!....( have a onida 29inch ....the worst TV repairers)......if you r in MUM ...go to shops like CROMA or HYPERCITY............i personally like SONY....yet I found Samsung better than some models of SONY(dont know which models
)..
whats the price diff between the sony and samsung ??
if more u might get samsung and also save some money ...or else u can spend it on a Divx DVD player or a good 5.1home theater....
if both LCDs are good or equal in SPEC,looks etc....go for samsung !!!
)..whats the price diff between the sony and samsung ??
if more u might get samsung and also save some money ...or else u can spend it on a Divx DVD player or a good 5.1home theater....
if both LCDs are good or equal in SPEC,looks etc....go for samsung !!!
pEtRa
Contributor
Hi all. I'm Mano's friend. Please have a demo of Panasonic 32-LX700 sooner, in India is 32-LX700, in UK its called 32-LXD700. I had a demo with Panasonic showroom two weeks back, and i was completely blown away by the picture quality. Awesome picture quality with broadcast (tata sky) way better than sony, LG, samsung. Motion tracking is smooth, detail recovery is excellent, and edges are sharper. I loved it, so would you.:hap2:
