Please see my replies below:
I completely understand the point, you're trying to make. Don't cry foul when Tamilians impose the same For Tamil movies in Chennai or Kannadigas do the same in Bengaluru. There's so much hue and cry when the people of the state wanted to change the name of the state capital.
I really do not get the point here. Kannad language or Tamilian (or matter of fact any Dravidian substratum language) are really not dying languages, per say. Nor is Marathi matter of fact. I fail to see this as a preservation practice. It is just being hawkish and forcing judgments for free speech and creativity. As well as controlling business.
The problem here's all the movie industries where most people understand hindi are in shambles, whether it's Marathi or Gujarati or Punjabi. South Indian movies are basically surviving and excelling because they've their audience base intact. They'd rather watch the hindi superhits dubbed or remade in their native language than watching it in hindi. That's why many mega budget hindi movies are dubbed and released in telugu and Tamil simultaneously.
Oh, come on...! Just because a certain business segment is doing better, the loosing half cannot crib about the competition being stronger. And then try to neuter the same. Hindi language cinema is not actually being forced on the population. They make more business (or better) sense and are armed with more fiscal and popularity vectors. If the penetration audience is present for a product, not matter how one tries the article is going to seep in and be consumed. It might, differ in Russia or maybe China...! Society should not be marshaled and shepherded as it is being tried here.
Earlier literature used to be the commonest mode of creativity in any language and movies have slowly replaced it for the common man. So to save their linguistic heritage in movie and digital era respective state governments have to take certain steps, and MH government is in right direction to save it's movie industry.
They can promote these activities -still- using the other mediums you have listed as failures. The government is just taking the easy route via subjugation and force-rule. Schools are still free to implement local languages.
The root cause of this issues is unwillingness of Hindi speaking population to learn and support local languages. When the city and state has given you so much that you settle down here, you should respect local language and culture.
Ethnocentric views, in today's day and age are useless and get one no where. As long as people are living as legal citizens and paying taxes and not into crime, there in no need to learn a local language. I personally believe in knowing as many languages as possible (and am learning my wife's native language too), but it should not be a mandate or frowned upon, if one does not yield. India is one of the most ethnocentric nation in this world, and that is our huge delta. We can never be united. Not talking about language here (which you have addressed below), but as Indians. Regarding culture: Indians of most of the respective states, have a lot of shared culture. That is enough of a contribution by migratory population sets. What else you expect as "respect to culture"..? Watching vernacular movies in the cinemas..?
Second and "biggest misconception is Hindi is a National language of India" . No it is not, it's a popular language in India but there's no official ordinance which supports this misconception.
This debate is not even about this. Why would this augmentation be raised, anyways..? It was attempted to be made an Official Language, but was rejected, and rightly so. All States, are allowed to use English and one local language for governance and civil proceedings. It was a popularity vote which suggested Hindi to be made National, but was put-down. I see nothing, wrong with this.
Then why is govt of India paying from it's pocket to popularize hindi, when it's not superior than any other regional language according to constitution ?? All languages spoken in India should be given equal preference by central government. So I don't find anything wrong in state governments coming up with measures to support their language and culture. When native hindi speaking population tries to use this unsupported myth to impose hindi and cover up their unwillingness to learn local language ; state governments have all the rights to do so.
Primarily, because the majority speakers understand Hindi and its related dialects. Mainly the Indo-Aryan branch of languages. Which was wrong. I totally agree. Though, what you are saying, that using cinema halls as a preservationist strategy is finitely sane, is incorrect. Culture and linguistics cannot be guided in such a manner. Too complex...! I fail to see: Where the native Hindi speaking population is propagating for National Status. Yes, the think-tanks and politicians are, but are they the common man..? The tit-for-tat corollary stated above sounds like a regime movement, well..almost...!
The central government should clarify that Hindi is not the official language.
I think it has.
Stop promoting hindi at the expense of the exchequer.
Agree.
Ideally English should be our national language not hindi.
Well, Ok. Sounds good.
We're United because of English not because of Hindi
LOL. Indians can never be united. Just travel 300-500 km out from your house, you shall know our UNITY.
By the way, in most of your sentences, you never typed Hindi, with a capital "H". Why..?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7dcac/7dcac283ae5e078e1182a0e66332aebad456125b" alt="Smile :) :)"