Been reading up a lot about SSD's since my earlier post in this thread, mainly because I want to buy one myself and am pretty much clueless about them.
@vyral_143
I may just have found a drive that meets ALL your requirements but you will have to stretch your budget by another Rs.200.This is never ending TBH, because for another Rs.1250/- you can go for the Crucial MX100 256Gb with double the capacity and so on.
Anyway, the drive I refer to is the
Plextor M6S 128GB SSD. Its currently listed as "in stock" for Rs.6,200/-.
The drive comes with a Marvell 88SS9187 controller & 20nm MLC NAND (Toshiba) with Seq Read speeds up to 520MB/s and Seq Writes up to 300MB/s. Here is a review FYI -
http://www.guru3d.com/articles-pages/plextor-m6s-ssd-review.html
Link in case you want to buy it -
http://www.onlyssd.com/product/plextor-m6s-128gb-ssd/#description
Also found a very interesting post regarding SSD failure rates.
This is from Marc Prieur, of hardware.fr and are SSD failures rates according to a French E-Tailer as of April 2014:
- Samsung 0.54%
- Sandisk 0.70%
- Kingston 0.72%
- Intel 0.90%
- Corsair 0.91%
- Crucial 1.08%
- OCZ 5.66%
Its interesting to see that Samsung actually has the LOWEST failure rates of all SSD vendors. The failure rates are based on parts sold between April 1st 2013 and October 1st 2013, for returns before April 2014, which represents 6 months to one year of usage. The statistics per brand are based on a sample of at least 500 sales.
I actually found it a bit ironical that Crucial has TWICE the failure rate of Samsung. I would have thought it would be the other way around considering Crucial SSD's use SLC (Single-Level Cell)/MLC NAND which are supposedly "more reliable and longer lasting" whereas Samsung uses the somewhat maligned TLC (or 3 bit MLC if you want) NAND on their popular drives.
In fact, if you visit the Micron homepage, they appear to have such a poor regard for TLC for SSD's that in their Technology usability chart, TLC is not even mentioned as appropriate for SSD's and is instead relegated to devices such as USB Sticks/Media Players & Mobile GPS!
Note however because of the small sample size, these numbers aren't representative of world wide failure rates. Even so, some info is better than nothing IMO...