You may not have read the thread through first, in my opinion.I know I am in the minority here, but I don't believe it's fair to ban/blacklist the seller in this case.
Yes, the seller did mislead by claiming the card is in mint condition whereas it has been repasted twice within a month and stickers are worn off etc etc...
But he did deliver a fully working product as he claimed to the buyer.
Yes, the GPU died the very next day in buyers' hands, but No Testing Warranty was discussed or promised between buyer and seller.
If the GPU was purchased from a local store and the same thing would have happened, I am sure the shopkeeper would just put all the blame on the buyer and wouldn't move a muscle. But in this case, the seller is ready to get the GPU repaired, at his own expense, even in/out shipping is on him.
The buyer cannot or hasn't yet proved that:
The GPU is repaired.
The GPU is mined on.
If this case was in court, no judge would decide in favor of the buyer due to the sole reason that no testing warranty was on the table and the item was delivered as working.
I think the buyer should accept the seller's offer and try to work things out with him. If the GPU is repaired successfully, the seller can offer some testing warranty or some partial refund as a gesture of goodwill. And if it can't be repaired, then the loss can be split.
But putting this solely on the seller is unfair, according to me, the rest is upto mods, buyer and seller.
Just my two cents.
Purchasing locally and online is not the same thing. When you buy something locally, you verify every detail and use your naked eyes to check and test. when you buy Something in a forum, You must rely on the description and the Seller. As a result, the testing warranty is implicit. The entire description in this instance is false, and when a description is fake, it just refers to deceiving someone or scamming something to obtain money.
You're essentially telling me to give the card to the Scamster so he can keep both the card and the money.